Chris, I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on Ancestry, , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), thought the date, and last name, "fitted". I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to find was a totally different man. Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up and plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew the relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a visit. Mary From: ChrisK To: NZ RootsWeb Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My question to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I can't easily locate this man's death? Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay Folio no 277 Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. Chris in Melbourne

Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community

For deaths in 1912, Woodville. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community _______________________________________________ The List Guidelines http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Hi Chris More accurately, for a death registered in 1912, Folio Number 277 is for district Woodville. The death might have occurred earlier, as in the case you mentioned (6 Dec 1911). Kevin -----Original Message----- From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community _______________________________________________ The List Guidelines http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Thanks Kevin. I think..emphasise think..that he died in Palmerston North. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Walker" <kjwgen@gmail.com> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:15 AM Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Hi Chris > > More accurately, for a death registered in 1912, Folio Number 277 is for > district Woodville. The death might have occurred earlier, as in the case > you mentioned (6 Dec 1911). > > Kevin > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] > Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. > To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information > which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database > death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio > number relates to the district where birth was registered. > Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? > > Chris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> > To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM > Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > >> Chris, >> >> I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on >> Ancestry, >> , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), >> thought the date, and last name, "fitted". >> I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to >> find >> was a totally different man. >> >> Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up >> and >> plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew >> the >> relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same >> school >> as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married >> , >> had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a >> visit. >> >> Mary >> >> From: ChrisK >> To: NZ RootsWeb >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM >> Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth >> >> I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have >> been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. >> But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My >> question >> to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I >> can't easily locate this man's death? >> >> Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles >> Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay >> Folio no 277 >> >> Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. >> >> Chris >> in Melbourne >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> The List Guidelines >> >> http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref >> Unsubscribe >> https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com >> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: >> https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 >> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb >> community > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community

Chris, do you get that from a burial website? Bear in mind that Palmerston North is the largest place near Woodville, which is tiny. All the evidence says he was buried in Woodville, and the newspapers also say where and how he died in Woodville. Cheers Kevin

Hi Chris To add to the most recent comments. The newspaper articles dated 6 Dec 1911 refer to the death occurring on the Monday. 6 Dec 1911 was a Wednesday, which suggests Charles died 4 Dec 1911. The NZ DIA website has the death of a Charles Stacey SITTEN dated 4 Dec 1911, reference 1912/2877. Could this be your man? Do you recognise 'Sitten'? As an earlier Lister mentioned, you can contact the DIA via email and inform them that a death appears to be missing from their online database. Provide them with the name, the year 1912, and the Folio number of 277. I have done this quite a few times with complete success. Regards Kevin -----Original Message----- From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community _______________________________________________ The List Guidelines http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Chris, have you checked Woodvile, Hawkes By cemetery info, at Tararua District Council online?It may be helpful, certainly many miles from Gore, in fact different islands.Good luck  MSent from Samsung tablet. -------- Original message --------From: ChrisK <ckealy@ozemail.com.au> Date: 21/11/18 12:05 (GMT+12:00) To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered.Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please?Chris----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net>To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AMSubject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth> Chris,>> I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry,> , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom  (I suspect ),> thought the date, and last name,  "fitted".> I did actually buy  a  Certificate, for  a date in that year,  only to > find> was a totally different man.>> Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and> plonked into a Tree,  totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the> relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school> as her children,  family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married ,> had children, died,  all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a> visit.>> Mary>> From: ChrisK> To: NZ RootsWeb> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM> Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth>> I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have> been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site.> But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question> to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I> can't easily locate this man's death?>> Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles> Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay> Folio no 277>> Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing.>> Chris> in  Melbourne>>> _______________________________________________>> The List Guidelines>> http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/>> _______________________________________________> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref> Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY  Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community _______________________________________________The List Guidelineshttp://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebprefUnsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.comPrivacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY  Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blogRootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community