According to the perpetual calendar and his death notice in the Woodville Examiner, he died on the 4th December 1911. The cemetery at Woodville is the old ''gorge'' not gore AnnieWaipukurau

Thank you to all listers for the clarification that Charles Stacey died in Woodville, as did his wife Rachel and that they are buried at the Old Gore Cemetery in Woodville. Special thanks to Angela for those additional newspaper articles. I am clear now about his burial date and death date of 4/12/1911. Will need to wait for DIA's reply to my email to see if Charles Stacey Sitten is the same chap Reg 1912/2877 as my Charles Stacey. thanks again Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Diane Wills" <pdew6040@gmail.com> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 11:10 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey > Hi > Charles Stacey is buried in the Old Gorge cemetery in Woodville in the > Tararua District. > > I can't find a relevant name in the BDM but they do say in their help > pages > that the death registration was up to the person in charge of the burial > and apparently some were missed for wahtever reason. The undertaker is > named on the cemetery record so it might be worth a try to see if their > records are still around. > Regards > Di Wills > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community

As an Australian, I have to rely on my NZ colleagues for geographical familiarity. I did discover the death notice when I knew he lived in Woodville. As an ex military man-65th Regiment, he was able to purchase 60 acres from the Lands Commision and he describes self on ERs as a settler. I believe that Old Gore cemetery is in Woodville Thank you David. I also have my arm in a sling! Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilton, David" <D.R.Wilton@massey.ac.nz> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:35 AM Subject: [nz]Re: NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 360 > Hi, PapersPast has an article as follows: > > Woodville Examiner, Volume XXVII, Issue 4469, 6 December 1911 (a Manawatu > newspaper) > The death occurred at Woodville on Monday of Mr Stacey, who has been a > resident of Woodville for many years. The deceased was a member of the > 65th Regiment, and in the early days was drill instructor at the local > school. Ho leaves a widow. The funeral took place this morning. > > Not sure why it doesnt show up on BDM Historical - maybe a typo in the > surname. If the geography is confusing, Woodville is at the eastern end > of the Manawatu Gorge - technically within Hawkes Bay, but only about > 10-15 km from Palmerston North. If 'Old Gore cemetery' is in Gore, that's > hundreds of km south; ie towards the bottom of the South Island, which > would be surprising ... > > > regards, Dave Wilton (not a real genie, but have my arm in a sling at > present and anything to fill in time is welcome ...) > > ________________________________ > From: new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com <new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:09:50 PM > To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Subject: NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 360 > > Send NEW-ZEALAND mailing list submissions to new-zealand@rootsweb.com > > To subscribe via email send a message with subject subscribe and body > subscribe to new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com > > To unsubscribe via email send a message with subject unsubscribe and > body unsubscribe to new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > new-zealand-owner@rootsweb.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of NEW-ZEALAND digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth (ChrisK) > 2. Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth (Kevin Walker) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:05:28 +1100 > From: ChrisK <ckealy@ozemail.com.au> > Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <ECE76AEDF2A14D9EAEFC0D02105356FA@inteldesktop> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information > which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database > death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio > number relates to the district where birth was registered. > Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? > > Chris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> > To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM > Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > >> Chris, >> >> I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on >> Ancestry, >> , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), >> thought the date, and last name, "fitted". >> I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to >> find >> was a totally different man. >> >> Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up >> and >> plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew >> the >> relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same >> school >> as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married >> , >> had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a >> visit. >> >> Mary >> >> From: ChrisK >> To: NZ RootsWeb >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM >> Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth >> >> I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have >> been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. >> But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My >> question >> to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I >> can't easily locate this man's death? >> >> Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles >> Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay >> Folio no 277 >> >> Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. >> >> Chris >> in Melbourne >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> The List Guidelines >> >> http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref >> Unsubscribe >> https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com >> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: >> https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 >> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb >> community > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:09:35 +1300 > From: "Kevin Walker" <kjwgen@gmail.com> > Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <00f501d48126$1c85d420$55917c60$@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > For deaths in 1912, Woodville. > Kevin > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] > Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. > To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information > which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database > death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio > number relates to the district where birth was registered. > Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? > > Chris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> > To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM > Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > >> Chris, >> >> I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on >> Ancestry, >> , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), >> thought the date, and last name, "fitted". >> I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to >> find >> was a totally different man. >> >> Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up >> and >> plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew >> the >> relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same >> school >> as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married >> , >> had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a >> visit. >> >> Mary >> >> From: ChrisK >> To: NZ RootsWeb >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM >> Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth >> >> I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have >> been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. >> But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My >> question >> to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I >> can't easily locate this man's death? >> >> Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles >> Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay >> Folio no 277 >> >> Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. >> >> Chris >> in Melbourne >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> The List Guidelines >> >> http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref >> Unsubscribe >> https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com >> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: >> https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 >> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb >> community > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > To contact the %(real_name)s list administrator, send an email to > %(real_name)s-admin@rootsweb.com. > > To post a message to the NEW-ZEALAND mailing list -- > new-zealand@rootsweb.com, send an email to %(real_name)s@rootsweb.com. > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > %(real_name)s-request@%(host_name)s > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body > of the > email with no additional text. > > > ------------------------------ > > End of NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 360 > ******************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community

Hi Julie, I appreciate the explanations for the respective databases. His death on Ancestry is a *maybe* I have since found a death notice in the Woodville Examiner for 6/12 1911 with his death a few days before. It looks like a previous lister might have discovered his bdm registration under a different name. Will await a reply from Registry. The old Gore cemetery is where he and his wife Rachel are buried. I think they died in Palmerston North. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julie Collins (Skellern)" <jools@maxnet.co.nz> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:29 AM Subject: [nz]Re: NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 360 > That it says Woodville is because that’s where it’s registered. Ancestry > have already (in theory) extrapolated the folio number for you, to the > district. But Woodville is a very long way from Gore, if that’s where (I > presume) the Old Gore Cemetery is. > > But to explain things a bit more: > > The Registrar of BDMs originally (and still do in libraries) had indeces > by year on microfiche, the folio was a reference to the district, but > there were no parents’ named. Ancestry.com has transcribed those for > their site. Registrar of BDM then computerised their records, allocating > new reference numbers, dropping the place of registration (who knows why?) > but adding the parents' Christian names. > > ergo: ancestry have one set of registrations, familysearch has the other. > Most details should match; many don’t! > > So, ancestry knows you’re looking for Charles Stacey, and have given you a > hint (please note… it is *not* a fact) that the Charles Stacey they have > records for, *maybe* your man. > > On familysearch the Woodville registration also has a matching burial in > Woodville. > > J > > On 21/11/2018, at 12:09 PM, new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:05:28 +1100 > From: ChrisK <ckealy@ozemail.com.au <mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au>> > Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com <mailto:new-zealand@rootsweb.com>> > Message-ID: <ECE76AEDF2A14D9EAEFC0D02105356FA@inteldesktop> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information > which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database > death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio > number relates to the district where birth was registered. > Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? > > Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Wonder if the Museum in Woodville can assist.. I used to regularly go up there to find headstones to help folk, but now out of the question.. health reasons.. but would enquire through the Museum in Pollen St. Woodville.. its listed with TE PAPA on Line Museums Adele Clareville.

Hi Charles Stacey is buried in the Old Gorge cemetery in Woodville in the Tararua District. I can't find a relevant name in the BDM but they do say in their help pages that the death registration was up to the person in charge of the burial and apparently some were missed for wahtever reason. The undertaker is named on the cemetery record so it might be worth a try to see if their records are still around. Regards Di Wills

Chris, do you get that from a burial website? Bear in mind that Palmerston North is the largest place near Woodville, which is tiny. All the evidence says he was buried in Woodville, and the newspapers also say where and how he died in Woodville. Cheers Kevin

Hi Chris To add to the most recent comments. The newspaper articles dated 6 Dec 1911 refer to the death occurring on the Monday. 6 Dec 1911 was a Wednesday, which suggests Charles died 4 Dec 1911. The NZ DIA website has the death of a Charles Stacey SITTEN dated 4 Dec 1911, reference 1912/2877. Could this be your man? Do you recognise 'Sitten'? As an earlier Lister mentioned, you can contact the DIA via email and inform them that a death appears to be missing from their online database. Provide them with the name, the year 1912, and the Folio number of 277. I have done this quite a few times with complete success. Regards Kevin -----Original Message----- From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community _______________________________________________ The List Guidelines http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Thanks Kevin. I think..emphasise think..that he died in Palmerston North. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Walker" <kjwgen@gmail.com> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:15 AM Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Hi Chris > > More accurately, for a death registered in 1912, Folio Number 277 is for > district Woodville. The death might have occurred earlier, as in the case > you mentioned (6 Dec 1911). > > Kevin > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] > Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. > To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information > which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database > death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio > number relates to the district where birth was registered. > Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? > > Chris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> > To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM > Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > >> Chris, >> >> I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on >> Ancestry, >> , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), >> thought the date, and last name, "fitted". >> I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to >> find >> was a totally different man. >> >> Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up >> and >> plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew >> the >> relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same >> school >> as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married >> , >> had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a >> visit. >> >> Mary >> >> From: ChrisK >> To: NZ RootsWeb >> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM >> Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth >> >> I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have >> been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. >> But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My >> question >> to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I >> can't easily locate this man's death? >> >> Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles >> Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay >> Folio no 277 >> >> Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. >> >> Chris >> in Melbourne >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> The List Guidelines >> >> http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref >> Unsubscribe >> https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com >> Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: >> https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 >> Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog >> RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb >> community > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community

Hi Chris Your earlier posting referred to Charles STACEY being in the "Old Gore Cemetery". Gore is in Southland which is a long way from Woodville ;-) In fact, Charles STACEY was buried in the Old Gorge Cemetery, Woodville on 6 Dec 1911 (the burial records for this cemetery are online on the Tararua District Council website). The Council records show Charles (age 84, 'widower') was buried in "Section - Main, Sub/Block - 5, Plot - 11". In the same grave is Rachel Besant STACEY (died 30 Oct 1906, buried 1 Nov 1906, age 61, married). From Paperspast: Woodville Examiner, Vol XXII, Issue 3945, 31 Oct 1906 "STACEY - At Franklin Road, Woodville, on the 30th October, Rachel Bisson, beloved wife of Charles Stacey; aged 66 years." And in same day's edition... "We regret to record the death of Mrs Charles Stacey, which took place at her residence, Franklin's Road yesterday. The deceased lady was a very old resident of Woodville having come here twenty-seven or twenty-eight years ago. Mr and Mrs Stacey went to live in the Wairarapa some years ago, but returned to Woodville within the last year. The deceased lady was of a bright, kkindly disposition, and was dearly loved by all who knew her." Woodville Examiner, Vol XXVII, Issue 4469, 6 Dec 1911 "The death occurred at Woodville on Monday of Mr Stacey, who has been a resident of Woodville for many years. The deceased was a member of the 65th Regiment, and in the early days was drill instructor at the local school. He leaves a widow. The funeral took place this morning." Woodville Examiner, Vol XXVII, Issue 4469, 15 Jan 1912 "As Mrs Stacey was driving along McLean Street on Friday afternoon, and just in front of Dr Mules' residence the horse stumbled and fell. The shaft of the buggy was broken and Mrs Stacey was thrown out rather heavily. She was carried into Dr Mules' house where her injuries were attended to. Luckily no bones were broken, and she was well enough to be driven home to her own residence." Woodville Examiner, Vol XXVII, Issue 4469, 9 Feb1912 (Report from Woodville Borough Council Meeting) "From Constable O'Halloran, asking if Council would make some allowance to Mrs Stacey in regard to the funeral expenses of the late Mr Stacey. The total charges were 12 pounds 5 shillings, which appeared to him to be high, and she had sold her cow for 7 pounds to pay part of them, and was without means to pay the balance. The Mayor said that the Council's share of the funeral expenses was 25 shillings for cemetery fees. Cr Grant moved, 'That the Council remit the cemetery fees', as he thought it a deserving case. Cr Kirkpatrick seconded, and it was carried, the Mayor saying he would see what he could do to assist the old lady with the balance." I suggest you follow Charles through the electoral rolls, in 1881 he is shown as a settler in Woodville, while the 1893 & 1896 rolls show Charles at Mauriceville and Rachel at Dreyerton. All three of these electoral rolls show land references for Charles, so it should be fairly straight forward to find the actual land he owned 9and probably lived on). Angela

Hi, PapersPast has an article as follows: Woodville Examiner, Volume XXVII, Issue 4469, 6 December 1911 (a Manawatu newspaper) The death occurred at Woodville on Monday of Mr Stacey, who has been a resident of Woodville for many years. The deceased was a member of the 65th Regiment, and in the early days was drill instructor at the local school. Ho leaves a widow. The funeral took place this morning. Not sure why it doesnt show up on BDM Historical - maybe a typo in the surname. If the geography is confusing, Woodville is at the eastern end of the Manawatu Gorge - technically within Hawkes Bay, but only about 10-15 km from Palmerston North. If 'Old Gore cemetery' is in Gore, that's hundreds of km south; ie towards the bottom of the South Island, which would be surprising ... regards, Dave Wilton (not a real genie, but have my arm in a sling at present and anything to fill in time is welcome ...) ________________________________ From: new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com <new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:09:50 PM To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 360 Send NEW-ZEALAND mailing list submissions to new-zealand@rootsweb.com To subscribe via email send a message with subject subscribe and body subscribe to new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com To unsubscribe via email send a message with subject unsubscribe and body unsubscribe to new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com You can reach the person managing the list at new-zealand-owner@rootsweb.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of NEW-ZEALAND digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth (ChrisK) 2. Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth (Kevin Walker) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:05:28 +1100 From: ChrisK <ckealy@ozemail.com.au> Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <ECE76AEDF2A14D9EAEFC0D02105356FA@inteldesktop> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:09:35 +1300 From: "Kevin Walker" <kjwgen@gmail.com> Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <00f501d48126$1c85d420$55917c60$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" For deaths in 1912, Woodville. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community _______________________________________________ The List Guidelines http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer To contact the %(real_name)s list administrator, send an email to %(real_name)s-admin@rootsweb.com. To post a message to the NEW-ZEALAND mailing list -- new-zealand@rootsweb.com, send an email to %(real_name)s@rootsweb.com. __________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to %(real_name)s-request@%(host_name)s with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body of the email with no additional text. ------------------------------ End of NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 360 ********************************************

That it says Woodville is because that’s where it’s registered. Ancestry have already (in theory) extrapolated the folio number for you, to the district. But Woodville is a very long way from Gore, if that’s where (I presume) the Old Gore Cemetery is. But to explain things a bit more: The Registrar of BDMs originally (and still do in libraries) had indeces by year on microfiche, the folio was a reference to the district, but there were no parents’ named. Ancestry.com has transcribed those for their site. Registrar of BDM then computerised their records, allocating new reference numbers, dropping the place of registration (who knows why?) but adding the parents' Christian names. ergo: ancestry have one set of registrations, familysearch has the other. Most details should match; many don’t! So, ancestry knows you’re looking for Charles Stacey, and have given you a hint (please note… it is *not* a fact) that the Charles Stacey they have records for, *maybe* your man. On familysearch the Woodville registration also has a matching burial in Woodville. J On 21/11/2018, at 12:09 PM, new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com wrote: Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:05:28 +1100 From: ChrisK <ckealy@ozemail.com.au <mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au>> Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com <mailto:new-zealand@rootsweb.com>> Message-ID: <ECE76AEDF2A14D9EAEFC0D02105356FA@inteldesktop> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris

Hi Chris More accurately, for a death registered in 1912, Folio Number 277 is for district Woodville. The death might have occurred earlier, as in the case you mentioned (6 Dec 1911). Kevin -----Original Message----- From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community _______________________________________________ The List Guidelines http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

For deaths in 1912, Woodville. Kevin -----Original Message----- From: ChrisK [mailto:ckealy@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, 21 November 2018 12:05 p.m. To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: [nz]Re: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community _______________________________________________ The List Guidelines http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

Yes I agree that some trees have rather incorrect/inaccurate information which is frustrating. But in this case it was a hint to Ancestry database death records and the folio number was quoted. I assume that the folio number relates to the district where birth was registered. Perhaps listers can clarify folio 277- where this is please? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Legarth" <legarthm@levin.pl.net> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:26 AM Subject: [nz]Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > Chris, > > I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on > Ancestry, > , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), > thought the date, and last name, "fitted". > I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to > find > was a totally different man. > > Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up > and > plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew > the > relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school > as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , > had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a > visit. > > Mary > > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My > question > to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I > can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles > Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community

Hi Avis, I would appreciate this. So far I haven't located a death notice so any help would be appreciated. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Avis McDonald" <avis.mcdonald@xtra.co.nz> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 9:04 AM Subject: [nz]Re: NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 356 > Hi Chris > > I am a genealogist and volunteer at the Hokonui Heritage Center. > If you have not had any replies and success , I am happy to do some > research with this death. > > Our branch indexed the deaths up to 1935 while they were still in the > local Court House and the HHC holds the local newspapers > > Avis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Julie Collins (Skellern) > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:29 AM > To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Subject: [nz]Re: NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 356 > > Query NZBDM with the original folio number from ancestry. Their indeces > have *no* soundex searching. Alternatively, the indeces have that > function through familysearch… and you’ll likely find a mistranscription, > and then be able to find it on BDM and order the printout (assuming that’s > what you want to do). > > J > > On 21/11/2018, at 10:17 AM, new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 > My question to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the > following hint if I can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding > Charles Stacey > Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 > Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Chris, I have been searching for someone, a Death Date has been given on Ancestry, , but, it seems it was all a guess from a researcher whom (I suspect ), thought the date, and last name, "fitted". I did actually buy a Certificate, for a date in that year, only to find was a totally different man. Was not the only family member, where a person has simply been picked up and plonked into a Tree, totally unconnected to a family in England. I knew the relative personally, was my Mother's first cousin, went to the same school as her children, family inquiries show, she was born, baptised, married , had children, died, all in N.Z., & never left this country. Even for a visit. Mary From: ChrisK To: NZ RootsWeb Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My question to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I can't easily locate this man's death? Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay Folio no 277 Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. Chris in Melbourne

Is perhaps a mistranscription when the indexes were digitised to be put online at the NZ historical BDMs website. A while back I was investigating approx 500 members of a cricket club and its predecessor clubs prior to 1920 and encountered numerous mistranscriptions. Suggest you email the online website to ask them to check the index for that name in case they need to make a correction. > > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 > My question to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following > hint if I can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding > Charles Stacey > Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 > Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne

I've tried Family Search and no luck there. I agree that there must be a transcription error, and so far have exhausted all the possible spellings of the name that I can think of..pity there isn't a soundex function. Thank you for your reply. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julie Collins (Skellern)" <jools@maxnet.co.nz> To: <new-zealand@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:29 AM Subject: [nz]Re: NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 356 > Query NZBDM with the original folio number from ancestry. Their indeces > have *no* soundex searching. Alternatively, the indeces have that > function through familysearch… and you’ll likely find a mistranscription, > and then be able to find it on BDM and order the printout (assuming that’s > what you want to do). > > J > > On 21/11/2018, at 10:17 AM, new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: ChrisK > To: NZ RootsWeb > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM > Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth > > > I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have > been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. > But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 > My question to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the > following hint if I can't easily locate this man's death? > > Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding > Charles Stacey > Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 > Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay > Folio no 277 > > Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. > > Chris > in Melbourne > > > _______________________________________________ > > The List Guidelines > > http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe > https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: > https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb > community >

Hi Chris I am a genealogist and volunteer at the Hokonui Heritage Center. If you have not had any replies and success , I am happy to do some research with this death. Our branch indexed the deaths up to 1935 while they were still in the local Court House and the HHC holds the local newspapers Avis -----Original Message----- From: Julie Collins (Skellern) Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:29 AM To: new-zealand@rootsweb.com Subject: [nz]Re: NEW-ZEALAND Digest, Vol 13, Issue 356 Query NZBDM with the original folio number from ancestry. Their indeces have *no* soundex searching. Alternatively, the indeces have that function through familysearch… and you’ll likely find a mistranscription, and then be able to find it on BDM and order the printout (assuming that’s what you want to do). J On 21/11/2018, at 10:17 AM, new-zealand-request@rootsweb.com wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: ChrisK To: NZ RootsWeb Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 5:31 PM Subject: Death Charles Stacey 1911 Palmerston Nth I am seeking clarification regarding the death of this man. So far I have been unsuccessful in locating his death on the BDM Registry site. But I did find his burial at Old Gore Cemeterty. died 6 Dec 1911 My question to listers is this. How can Ancestry notify me of the following hint if I can't easily locate this man's death? Ancestry sent this hint from NZ Death Index 1848-1966 regarding Charles Stacey Death Date Jan-Mar 1912 Registration place Woodville, Hawkes Bay Folio no 277 Could someone shed some light on this please? I find this confusing. Chris in Melbourne _______________________________________________ The List Guidelines http://new-zealand-l.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/new-zealand@rootsweb.com Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community