I seriouslycouldn't wait to read all the info on these dastardly Kush's! As much as I regret saying this, they are the Kush's on the films. found a bit more info also Monica. Because you are so right, combed those films and more, so bare with me. My info is as this: Stanislaus and Mary are not Michael Kush's parents. Michael Kush's (b 1843-d. 1912, brd Krakow) parent's were Michael Kus b 1814 and Sophia Augustyn b 1820, mrd 1835. they had 11 children Marianna, Joannes, Catherina, Michael, Francisca, Anna, Ludwig, Thomas, Joannes and Appolonia, all born in Poland. Michael married a 2nd time to Agnes Farczek in 1863 (not long after Sophia's death). they had 6 children victoria, Bartholmus, Francicus, Michael (1879), Anna, Sophia. Michael born 1843, had a uncle named Sebationus and a child. Michael 1843's obit said very little, basically that he died of thoart cancer. A picture I posted on Platte County Rootsweb, has three men in it, the first one I believe is Louis/Ladislaus Kush (his sone b 1884), the 2nd being Michael Kus'/ Kush (1843) and the 3rd Thomas Kush (Michael (1843)'s brother). Not proven but my belief. the photo was provided to me from my aunt Helen, picture that she had no idea who they were, the photo's had come from her mother's things. I believe Ludwig Kush (1851- 1930) is Michael's brother and Joseph Kush (1862-1947). Most of Michael's sibling's did end up in Platte County. By all accounts ludwig William Kush (1851) and Michael are brother's. Info from the LDS films and Platte County marriage records. Again, the same for Thomas Kush (1851) clearly listed in the LDS films as his brother. In info I got from Thomas (1851) family (Brian Meyer) a news article for Thomas's 94th Birthday, it states one brother Joe Kush of Tarnov. The picture's I have, one is Joe and Agnes in front of a barn, that I believe is taken at the home place of Michael Kush (1843) and one is Thomas (1851) also in front of the barn. I have scanned quite a few of the entries from the LDS films, if some one wants them to study (or the info and you can look up). Michael (1843) and Katherina Pawlak were married 1868 in Kcyznia (found on the Pozan Project) and Immagrated 6 May 1870. Although the ship list states "farchin" and "marchin" the ages may perhaps suggest an uncle. Debi On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, MONICA ZENDEJAS <[email protected]> wrote: > > I finally got to my computer with my genealogy in it, and can now put my > "two cents" in! :) > Here is what I have extracted from the Leki Gorne/Leki Dolne (films > #1898738 and 1898739) on the Kus line (and I extracted all the Kus names I > found). Deb Waterman and I both have combed those films and did not find her > Michael Kush ancestor on those films. > Michael Kus born Sep 23 1783 in Leki Dolne/Gorne and Apollonia Dudek born > Feb 5 1785 were married 25 Nov 1805 in Leki Dolne/Gorne. They had 7 > children:Sebastian born abt 1799, married Agnes ZajacVictoria born 21 Dec > 1807 marr. Martin PolaszecFranciscus born 1 sep 1811 marr. Anna > MoryowiecMichael Kus born 25 sep 1814 marr. Sophia AugustynJoannes born 11 > May 1817 marr. Catherine TworekCatherina born 4 Nov 1820 marr. Jacob > HebdaSebastian born 18 Jan 1824 > I realize there are two Sebastian's listed, and I never found the first > one's actual birth record. I did however, find the marriage record for > Sebastian Kus and Agnes Zajac. The marriage records show that Sebastian was > 46 years old and Agnes was 21 years old and both were widowed before this > marriage. The marriage date was 23 Sep 1845 in Leki Gorne. So, unless the > age was recorded wrong, that is how I came up with the 1799 estimated birth > date. The Sebastian I have an actual birth record for would have been 21 at > the time. So unless the switched the dates, and Agnes was 46 and Sebastian > was 21, that is why I have 2 Sebastian's listed. > At any rate, Sebastian Kus and Agnes Zajac were the parents of 7 > children:Marianna born 23 Oct 1849 marr. Jacob MicekMichael Kus born 22 Aug > 1846 and died 24 May 1847Augustinus born 16 Nov 1857Stanislaus born 5 May > 1859Joannes born 14 Oct 1861Thomas born 8 Nov 1863Sophia born 13 Apr 1866 > The Michael Kush born 15 Jul 1843 and died 24 Jul 1912 who married > Katherine Pawlicki in Poland abt 1868, his father is Stanislaus Kush and > mother is Mary. This Michael immigrated abt 1870.The only Stanislaus Kush > connected to the other family from Leki Dolne/Gorne is the son of Sebastian > Kus and Agnes Zajac. But he was born in 1859, after Michael, so clearly, > NOT the father. > So unless someone has any other way to connect these two families, there > are 2 separate Kus/Kush families in Platte county. And we don't know > exactly where the Michael Kush born in 1843 was actually born, other than > Galacia, Tarnow area of Poland. > Monica > > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 01:08:52 -0600 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [NEPLATTE] Quer > > > > All - > > > > I should have deleted the below in this post but its relevant to > this subject at hand, that is to say "The Kush (kus')" Family in and around > Columbus in the early day's. > > > > Ever since I first subscribed to this list, in the late 1800's or so > (Smile), connecting these two Families has reared up periodically, talked > about for a while more, then put back to sleep again. > > > > The advancements in genealogy as a hobby, plus all the new data > bases available and in use, coupled with the list looking through specific > records from the Columbus area relevant to "KUSH" from various sources to > include the LDS, should have produced results by now. > > > > One can only conclude that they are not related. Either that, or the > Family connection took place well before any Kush came to Nebraska. > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > On Feb 1, 2011, at 7:43 PM, Megan Mueller <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Mike Kush, born 1842 Poland, was the son of Stanislaus and Mary, who > lived > > > with him in 1880 (see census for Butler Twp, Platte Co). I have not > yet > > > discovered when Stanislaus and Mary came to the US, or when they died. > > > > > > Megan > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Thomas E. Lassek <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > >> Marge - > > >> > > >> "It has come to pass" that your information posted, I believe, to > your > > >> website, has received Cudos from a respected source. "I defer to Marge > > >> Sandliers Genealogy research since she is very careful in checking and > > >> recording data". (Yay for Marge) !! (Yay for Tom to post the Cudo) !! > > >> > > >> Specifically, it was thought that Michael Kush and Joseph Kush were > > >> brothers. If so, then that would have been the Familial connection, > uniting > > >> the two Families. Lots of time has passed since the approximate time > of your > > >> entry and I'm interested if any new leads have materialized. > > >> > > >> I now understand that the connection, if there is a connection, is > > >> further back in history. Would this be a correct statement ?? > > >> > > >> Question : Where does Michael Kus' fit in with respect to the > Family?? > > >> His tombstone at the Krakow cemetery shows he was born 20 September > 1842 and > > >> died 24 July 1912. Originally, it was thought that he was a brother to > > >> Joseph and Ludwik Kus' / Kush, but apparently this is not the case. A > shame > > >> really because this would have been the Connection. > > >> > > >> Note : a bit chilly here today, 66f, overcast with a little wind. > If it > > >> were a bit warmer I'd till the garden and plant potatoes and peas. > > >> > > >> Tom > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Looking a Marge Sandlier's Kush descendancy list, it doesn't include > > >> Michael and Joseph Kush as brothers. I thought this was the key to > unite > > >> the two Kush lines. I was wrong. I defer to Marge Sandlier's > genealogy > > >> research since she is very careful in checking and recording data. > The > > >> common ancestor is probably still further back in history . > > >> Who is this Michael Kus' buried at the Krakow cemetery with the > > >> inscription: Born September 20 1842. Died July 24 1912? I thought > he was > > >> a brother to Joseph and Ludwik. Apparently not. > > >> Ron > > >> > > >> ------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Debi,Great find on the Poznan Project. It certainly fits. Did you order the film from Kcynia and check to see if the parents are listed on the marriage record? > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:15:43 -0600 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [NEPLATTE] Michael KUS/KUSH > > I seriouslycouldn't wait to read all the info on these dastardly Kush's! > > As much as I regret saying this, they are the Kush's on the films. found a > bit more info also Monica. Because you are so right, combed those films and > more, so bare with me. > > My info is as this: > Stanislaus and Mary are not Michael Kush's parents. > Michael Kush's (b 1843-d. 1912, brd Krakow) parent's were > Michael Kus b 1814 and Sophia Augustyn b 1820, mrd 1835. they had 11 > children > Marianna, Joannes, Catherina, Michael, Francisca, Anna, Ludwig, Thomas, > Joannes and Appolonia, all born in Poland. Michael married a 2nd time to > Agnes Farczek in 1863 (not long after Sophia's death). they had 6 children > victoria, Bartholmus, Francicus, Michael (1879), Anna, Sophia. > > Michael born 1843, had a uncle named Sebationus and a child. Michael 1843's > obit said very little, basically that he died of thoart cancer. A picture I > posted on Platte County Rootsweb, has three men in it, the first one I > believe is Louis/Ladislaus Kush (his sone b 1884), the 2nd being Michael > Kus'/ Kush (1843) and the 3rd Thomas Kush (Michael (1843)'s brother). Not > proven but my belief. the photo was provided to me from my aunt Helen, > picture that she had no idea who they were, the photo's had come from her > mother's things. > > I believe Ludwig Kush (1851- 1930) is Michael's brother and Joseph Kush > (1862-1947). Most of Michael's sibling's did end up in Platte County. By all > accounts ludwig William Kush (1851) and Michael are brother's. Info from > the LDS films and Platte County marriage records. Again, the same for > Thomas Kush (1851) clearly listed in the LDS films as his brother. In info > I got from Thomas (1851) family (Brian Meyer) a news article for Thomas's > 94th Birthday, it states one brother Joe Kush of Tarnov. > > The picture's I have, one is Joe and Agnes in front of a barn, that I > believe is taken at the home place of Michael Kush (1843) and one is Thomas > (1851) also in front of the barn. > > I have scanned quite a few of the entries from the LDS films, if some one > wants them to study (or the info and you can look up). > > Michael (1843) and Katherina Pawlak were married 1868 in Kcyznia (found on > the Pozan Project) and Immagrated 6 May 1870. Although the ship list states > "farchin" and "marchin" the ages may perhaps suggest an uncle. > Debi > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 3:29 AM, MONICA ZENDEJAS <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I finally got to my computer with my genealogy in it, and can now put my > > "two cents" in! :) > > Here is what I have extracted from the Leki Gorne/Leki Dolne (films > > #1898738 and 1898739) on the Kus line (and I extracted all the Kus names I > > found). Deb Waterman and I both have combed those films and did not find her > > Michael Kush ancestor on those films. > > Michael Kus born Sep 23 1783 in Leki Dolne/Gorne and Apollonia Dudek born > > Feb 5 1785 were married 25 Nov 1805 in Leki Dolne/Gorne. They had 7 > > children:Sebastian born abt 1799, married Agnes ZajacVictoria born 21 Dec > > 1807 marr. Martin PolaszecFranciscus born 1 sep 1811 marr. Anna > > MoryowiecMichael Kus born 25 sep 1814 marr. Sophia AugustynJoannes born 11 > > May 1817 marr. Catherine TworekCatherina born 4 Nov 1820 marr. Jacob > > HebdaSebastian born 18 Jan 1824 > > I realize there are two Sebastian's listed, and I never found the first > > one's actual birth record. I did however, find the marriage record for > > Sebastian Kus and Agnes Zajac. The marriage records show that Sebastian was > > 46 years old and Agnes was 21 years old and both were widowed before this > > marriage. The marriage date was 23 Sep 1845 in Leki Gorne. So, unless the > > age was recorded wrong, that is how I came up with the 1799 estimated birth > > date. The Sebastian I have an actual birth record for would have been 21 at > > the time. So unless the switched the dates, and Agnes was 46 and Sebastian > > was 21, that is why I have 2 Sebastian's listed. > > At any rate, Sebastian Kus and Agnes Zajac were the parents of 7 > > children:Marianna born 23 Oct 1849 marr. Jacob MicekMichael Kus born 22 Aug > > 1846 and died 24 May 1847Augustinus born 16 Nov 1857Stanislaus born 5 May > > 1859Joannes born 14 Oct 1861Thomas born 8 Nov 1863Sophia born 13 Apr 1866 > > The Michael Kush born 15 Jul 1843 and died 24 Jul 1912 who married > > Katherine Pawlicki in Poland abt 1868, his father is Stanislaus Kush and > > mother is Mary. This Michael immigrated abt 1870.The only Stanislaus Kush > > connected to the other family from Leki Dolne/Gorne is the son of Sebastian > > Kus and Agnes Zajac. But he was born in 1859, after Michael, so clearly, > > NOT the father. > > So unless someone has any other way to connect these two families, there > > are 2 separate Kus/Kush families in Platte county. And we don't know > > exactly where the Michael Kush born in 1843 was actually born, other than > > Galacia, Tarnow area of Poland. > > Monica > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 01:08:52 -0600 > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [NEPLATTE] Quer > > > > > > All - > > > > > > I should have deleted the below in this post but its relevant to > > this subject at hand, that is to say "The Kush (kus')" Family in and around > > Columbus in the early day's. > > > > > > Ever since I first subscribed to this list, in the late 1800's or so > > (Smile), connecting these two Families has reared up periodically, talked > > about for a while more, then put back to sleep again. > > > > > > The advancements in genealogy as a hobby, plus all the new data > > bases available and in use, coupled with the list looking through specific > > records from the Columbus area relevant to "KUSH" from various sources to > > include the LDS, should have produced results by now. > > > > > > One can only conclude that they are not related. Either that, or the > > Family connection took place well before any Kush came to Nebraska. > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 1, 2011, at 7:43 PM, Megan Mueller <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Mike Kush, born 1842 Poland, was the son of Stanislaus and Mary, who > > lived > > > > with him in 1880 (see census for Butler Twp, Platte Co). I have not > > yet > > > > discovered when Stanislaus and Mary came to the US, or when they died. > > > > > > > > Megan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Thomas E. Lassek <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >> Marge - > > > >> > > > >> "It has come to pass" that your information posted, I believe, to > > your > > > >> website, has received Cudos from a respected source. "I defer to Marge > > > >> Sandliers Genealogy research since she is very careful in checking and > > > >> recording data". (Yay for Marge) !! (Yay for Tom to post the Cudo) !! > > > >> > > > >> Specifically, it was thought that Michael Kush and Joseph Kush were > > > >> brothers. If so, then that would have been the Familial connection, > > uniting > > > >> the two Families. Lots of time has passed since the approximate time > > of your > > > >> entry and I'm interested if any new leads have materialized. > > > >> > > > >> I now understand that the connection, if there is a connection, is > > > >> further back in history. Would this be a correct statement ?? > > > >> > > > >> Question : Where does Michael Kus' fit in with respect to the > > Family?? > > > >> His tombstone at the Krakow cemetery shows he was born 20 September > > 1842 and > > > >> died 24 July 1912. Originally, it was thought that he was a brother to > > > >> Joseph and Ludwik Kus' / Kush, but apparently this is not the case. A > > shame > > > >> really because this would have been the Connection. > > > >> > > > >> Note : a bit chilly here today, 66f, overcast with a little wind. > > If it > > > >> were a bit warmer I'd till the garden and plant potatoes and peas. > > > >> > > > >> Tom > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Looking a Marge Sandlier's Kush descendancy list, it doesn't include > > > >> Michael and Joseph Kush as brothers. I thought this was the key to > > unite > > > >> the two Kush lines. I was wrong. I defer to Marge Sandlier's > > genealogy > > > >> research since she is very careful in checking and recording data. > > The > > > >> common ancestor is probably still further back in history . > > > >> Who is this Michael Kus' buried at the Krakow cemetery with the > > > >> inscription: Born September 20 1842. Died July 24 1912? I thought > > he was > > > >> a brother to Joseph and Ludwik. Apparently not. > > > >> Ron > > > >> > > > >> ------------------------------- > > > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > > >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > > >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message