I'll throw out the suggestion of every-other month. Sincerely, Mike Peterson Emmons Traill --------------------------- > My biggest concern is about updating the websites. I think we all agree > that our sites should be checked for broken links, and submissions added in > a timely manner. I want your opinions about what is 'timely.' > How often should we require that a site be checked for bad links and > updated? Real Life can be a stinker and thwart us in our attempts to keep > sites updated, but yet, letting a site go for six months or a year isn't > good for researchers. Here's what I have written for the > keeping-the-sites-updated requirement: > > "County pages must be kept updated. This includes adding submissions in a > timely manner and checking for broken and outdated links -- no less than > ????. " > > What should we fill in that question mark with? Without some sort of time > period established, 'timely' is too ambiguous to mean anything. Please give > me some discussion!