RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 7840/10000
  1. 12/17/1999 05:57:36
    1. Re: [NCROOTS] E-mail
    2. I intended my message (see below) as a suggestion for efficient genealogical research. I apologize to those who don't see the connection between that message and research methods. Joyce B. in Tennessee In a message dated 12/17/1999 1:45:06 PM Central Standard Time, bbonham@awod.com writes: > Subj: Re: [NCROOTS] E-mail > Date: 12/17/1999 1:45:06 PM Central Standard Time > From: bbonham@awod.com (Barbara Farthing Bonham) > Reply-to: msb@myfamily.org > To: CBStark@aol.com > > Joyce, > > Please don't waste Rootsweb space with these non genealogical messages. > > Thanks. > > Barbara > > CBStark@aol.com wrote: > > > In a message dated 12/16/1999 10:54:44 PM Central Standard Time, > > NCROOTS-D-request@rootsweb.com writes: > > > > > A good indicator that it wasn't something I wanted to open was the fact > > > that it was addressed to ME, from ME!!!! Pretty suspicious! > > > > I frequently send e-mails to myself. > > > > I subscribe to lists in digest form, and very often there will be one > message > > on the digest that I want to keep. I copy and paste it to an e-mail form, > > delete the rest of the digest, and the next time I go online I send it to > > myself. When that e-mail turns up in my aol filing cabinet, I know that > it > > contains important information and then file it under the particular > family > > name. > > > > Joyce B. in TN > >

    12/17/1999 10:51:07
    1. [NCROOTS] Border dispute verse
    2. Stephen G. Eddleman
    3. Ron, I remember exactly the same verse, I heard it the first time when I was in a 5th grade U.S. History class, 40 years ago. I can't say that I have heard or seen it in print since then. Steve Eddleman -----Original Message----- From: OpusLola@aol.com [mailto:OpusLola@aol.com] Sent: Friday, December 17, 1999 5:29 AM To: NCROOTS-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [NCROOTS] Re:Rowland/Roland/W. NC Looking for any family of Thomas Rowland, b. abt 1760-65, son of Augustine Rowland of VA. Family reportedly lived in Montgomery, Caburrus, and other western NC counties. RE: NC/SC border disputes. Many states fought for border dominance for years. Early surveyors were not very reliable, and border disputes errupted at many times. sometimes families were forced to pay taxes in both states. As a kid, I was learning about Andrew Jackson. Reportedly Andy was born and raised in just such a disputed border area between NC and SC. As the story went all the kids who wanted to be N. Carolinans had a verse of ryme for the Southerners and vice a versa. Here is how I remeber the verses. "North Carolina- old dried bones-all they eat is scrub pine cones." "South Carolina- old white trash-all they eat is Rabbit hash" Don/t know if the above are true but it was in my history book. Ron Hughes, in Mississippi ==== NCROOTS Mailing List ==== To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a message to NCROOTS-L-REQUEST@rootsweb.com with the one word UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message. ============================== Search ALL of RootsWeb's mailing lists in real time. RootsWeb's Personalized Mailing Lists: http://pml.rootsweb.com/

    12/17/1999 10:06:02
    1. [NCROOTS] E-mail
    2. In a message dated 12/16/1999 10:54:44 PM Central Standard Time, NCROOTS-D-request@rootsweb.com writes: > A good indicator that it wasn't something I wanted to open was the fact > that it was addressed to ME, from ME!!!! Pretty suspicious! I frequently send e-mails to myself. I subscribe to lists in digest form, and very often there will be one message on the digest that I want to keep. I copy and paste it to an e-mail form, delete the rest of the digest, and the next time I go online I send it to myself. When that e-mail turns up in my aol filing cabinet, I know that it contains important information and then file it under the particular family name. Joyce B. in TN

    12/17/1999 05:50:39
    1. [NCROOTS] Re: James WHITE - Rowan Co., NC
    2. Hi everyone, I have no idea who the parents of James WHITE from Iredell Co., NC m. Mary LAWSON are, but in the Early Settlers of Rowan Co., NC (Rowan borders Iredell) are WHITE's shown below. Ruth in NC e-mail: RLugowski@aol.com Rootsweb Sponsor 1756 - Henry WHITE 1793 - Isaac WHITE 1753 - Jonathan WHITE 1762 - John WHITE 1768 - James WHITE 1764 - Lewis WHITE 1778 - Luke WHITE 1764 - Robert WHITE 1780 - Thomas WHITE 1753 - Mathew WHITE

    12/17/1999 05:23:17
    1. [NCROOTS] Found Relatives/ Many Thanks/ List Works
    2. I would like to thank everyone for all the wonderful response and helpful replies I have received in the last 6 months. These list are wonderful tools and thanks to all I have received bits and pieces to my brickwalls and no lie found a total of 20 relatives ( cousins I did not know). Don't ever get discouraged and keep searching for this is a most marvelous way to research, plus the blessings of finding so many good, kind, friendly people. Many Thanks, Happy Holidays, and God Bless! Always searching for Levi Canter and his wife Sarah and Joseph Whittaker, until the wall comes tumbling down. Sincerely, Connie Knipp

    12/17/1999 02:30:27
    1. [NCROOTS] Death Index
    2. Can someone tell me if there is a death index for the middle to late 1800s? I would like information on when my great-great grandparents died? and were buried. John, born 1800 and Sarah D. born 1806 McFarland were in Guilford County, NC in 1850. Any help is appreciated. Thank you.

    12/16/1999 11:54:49
    1. [NCROOTS] Re:Rowland/Roland/W. NC
    2. Looking for any family of Thomas Rowland, b. abt 1760-65, son of Augustine Rowland of VA. Family reportedly lived in Montgomery, Caburrus, and other western NC counties. RE: NC/SC border disputes. Many states fought for border dominance for years. Early surveyors were not very reliable, and border disputes errupted at many times. sometimes families were forced to pay taxes in both states. As a kid, I was learning about Andrew Jackson. Reportedly Andy was born and raised in just such a disputed border area between NC and SC. As the story went all the kids who wanted to be N. Carolinans had a verse of ryme for the Southerners and vice a versa. Here is how I remeber the verses. "North Carolina- old dried bones-all they eat is scrub pine cones." "South Carolina- old white trash-all they eat is Rabbit hash" Don/t know if the above are true but it was in my history book. Ron Hughes, in Mississippi

    12/16/1999 11:28:38
    1. [Fwd: Re: [NCROOTS] NC/SC]
    2. Barbara Farthing Bonham
    3. -------- Original Message -------- From: sarapsmith@webtv.net (Mrs. Sara Smith) Subject: Re: [NCROOTS] NC/SC Hi Alice, My name is Nancy and my aunt was married to Bright Hilton Barefoot. His family was from NC and recently while checking out a cementery website in the Cape Fear area, I found a lot of graves with the Barefoot name. Just thought you would like to know. Nancy Ward

    12/16/1999 10:23:37
    1. [Fwd: Re: [NCROOTS] NC/SC]
    2. Barbara Farthing Bonham
    3. -------- Original Message -------- From: LeMaysinVA@aol.com Subject: Re: [NCROOTS] NC/SC They were never one state. In Colonial times you some times see Carolina mentioned but even in mid 1700s most of the time they are mentioned seperately. In most histories even by 1700 the population etc are shown seperately.ARL

    12/16/1999 10:02:06
    1. Re: [NCROOTS] NC/SC
    2. Robert M Butler
    3. NORTH CAROLINA and SOUTH CAROLINA STATE LINE HISTORY....HOW OUR LINE GOT THE NOTCH: A remarkable history of bumbling, battling and confusion is recorded indelibly on the North Carolina-South Carolina boundary. By: Dave C Harper, THE STATE, Oct. 1979 It seems that every twist and turn in NC's boundary with SC has a story of its own. Take for instance, the notch that appears below. Mecklenburg County. One might assume that surveyours running a straight line westward from Scotland Co to Polk Co might have lost their bearing and drifted erratically northward before finding their westward orientation again. But not so. The notch was caused by almost 80 years of politicking. A survery ending in 1737 had established a boundary from the Atlantic Ocean northwestward to where both North and South Carolina believed it intersected the 35th parallel of lattitude. In a meadow, a cedar stake was set by the surveyors, and from that stake an imaginary line headed due west that was declared as the dividing between the two states by the British Board of Trade. This line went unsurveyed as settlers from both states pushed westward from the coast. In 1750, NC established Anson County, just west of the Little Pee Dee River. At the same time, settlers from SC, with land grants authorized in Charleston, moved into the region. Some of their grants entitled them to the same land that NC and signed over to its people. Trouble was inevitable. In the MNC Colonial Records, a letter written on Feb 8, 1755 by Gov Arthur Dobbs to the British Board of Trade said that, "...there are perpetual Quarrels among the Settlers near the Line when one takes out a Patent from the Government another goes to South Carolina and takes a Patent for the same there which is never refused and endeavours by force to get possession." Both Gov Dobbs and Gov James Glen of SC accused each other of spawning the "outrages" that occurred in Anson Co. as a result of the nebulous boundary.Hugh T Lefler and Albert R Newsome, in their book, North Carolina, The History of a southern State, said that the land question caused, "ill feeling, confusion, disorder, loss of revenue to both colonies, and riots." The area became, "a kind of Sanctuary allowed to Criminals and Vagabonds, " Dobbs wrote of the violent settlements. An NC sheriff was arrested by South Carolina for collecting taxes. Surveyors and tax collectors from South Carolina were called "the invasion force" by Gov Dobbs, who ordered them repelled. In another letter to the Board of Trade, Dobbs said, according to Lefler and Newsome, "there was so much confusion that the bordering Counties can't be settled." THE CATAWBA BOUNDARY In 1762, the Board of Trade finally intervened and asked the colonies to mark their boundary farther westward through the disputed area. A S Salley, Secretary of the SC Historical Commission wrote in his pamphlet titled, "The Boundary Line between North and South Carolina." that the Board of Trade insturcted both governors the "Commissioners shall then be appointed by both Provinces to continue it (the boundary line)...due west until it meets the Eastern limit of the Lands claimed by the Catawbas." In an earlier treaty with South Carolina, the Catawba Indians were give a 15 mile by 15 mile square tract on the Catawba River. If it still existed today, it would take in Rock Hill, SC and much of the area east of it to the NC line. Salley said that South Carolina actually wanted the tribe to remain at that location. When other localities were pushing the Indians ever westward, South Carolina needed the Catawba warriors and trackers because they were "a very useful Body of Men to keep our numerous negroes in some awe." The heavy labor needed to clear the wilderness farms required a large slave population. The white settlers were afraid of losing control of the slaves, so they kept the Indians as an auxiliary militia, as well as using them to track runaways. Five months after SC Deputy Surveyor Samuel Wyly finished marking off the Catawba boundaries in Feb 1764, a joint North and South Carolina survey team began running a line from the terminus of the 1737 survey (now near the corner of Richmond and Scotland counties, and Marlboro County, SC) westward for about 65 miles to the Catawba lands. THE LINE STOPS SHORT Salley reported in Oct 1764 the surveyor commissioners stopped at the Old Salisbury Rd (a colonial highway that ran from Salisbury NC to Camden SC; today US Route 521 follows much of the same path). They reported to Lt Gov Wm Bull, Jr of SC, "that the Line did not strike the Eastern Bounds of the Catawba Lands but ran a little southward of that Line..." But, "if continued (it) will strike their Southwest boundary," Bull wrote in a report to the Board of Trade. If the line had been continued, Salley's map shows that it would have hit the Catawba boundary. But it was never run any farther than the Salisbury Road. Gov. Bull, in a later letter to the Board of Trade, sugggested that the state line stop at the road, then follow it northward until it reached the Catawba lands, through which it passed. Then, he proposed that it should, "continue along round (sic) the Eastern Bounds of the Catawba lands until it strikes the East Bank of the Catawba River and thence up the Catawba River to its ource in or near the Cherokee Mountains." The alternation of the line at Salisbury Road didn't bother NC at that time. But if SC had been allowed a boundary to the source of the Catawba River,everything west of Charlotte and south of Hickory (probably including Asheville) would now be in SC. 35TH PARALLEL MISPLACED North Carolina's Gov William Tryon countered by holding fast to the original charter that said the 35th parallel was the legal line dividing the Carolinas from the Atlantic to the Pacific. But in 1769, a South Carolina survey found that the 65 mile line was at latitude 34º 49'; 11 miles south of where it was supposed to be. Salley reported that Gov Lord Charles Montagu of South Carolina submitted a report of the Council of South Carolina to the Board of Trade outlining the erroneous latitude finding and a claim that the state, because of this error, had lost "about 600 square miles or 422,00 acres of land equal to one of the smaller counties in England." THE COMPROMISE The Board of Trade settled the dispute with a compromise. The line of 1764 would remain intact, as would the circumvention of the Catawba lands. But the line would go northward only as far as the forks of the Catawba River. Mecklenburg and Gaston Counties corner with York Co, SC, just southwest of Charlotte, at this point. From there, it would run due west for about 62 miles where it would stop at the Cherokee lands. Gov Tryon had the Cherokee line surveyed earlier in 1767. It limited North Carolina's westward trend to about present day Polk County. In 1772, a year after London's order, the line was surveyed by a team of surveyors from both states. Josiah Martin, the new governor of North Carolina, gave the project his approval. But the NC Legislature refused to honor or fund the compromise. They held steadfastly to the original 35th latitude charter. It wasn't until 1813, when the states were negotiating the final section of their line through the mountains, did North Carolina acknowledge the latitude error of the 1764 survey. Prominent astronomer and president of the University of North Carolina, Joseph Caldwell, made extensive measurements to fixed stars and confirmed that the line was indeed 11 miles too far south. He checked the position of the 1772 line at the forks of the Catawba River as well. It was found to be at latitude 35º 09', or, in terms of distance,about 12 miles north of the 35th parallel. It seemed that if one line, 62 miles long was 11 miles too far to the south; and the other was 12 miles too far north and 65 miles long, the two areas would just about offset each other. So why not trade? THE STATES AGREE Well, that's what the states did. And the trade was fairly even. South Carolina gained what it called the "New Acquisition." which had sparsely settled woodlands and fields, and the Catawba River as a trade route. North Carolina keep its Union and Anson counties, which were woodlands and fields also, with the Great Pee Dee River to support trade. R D W Conner in his history titled NORTH CAROLINA, explained that, "it thus appeared that what North Carolina lost by the line of 1772 was about a fair offset for what she gained by the line of 1735 (same as the 1764 line; because the 1735-37 survey was supposed to have been carried westward. It wasn't supposed to be stopped at Scotland County, or to be delayed for 27 years) and; of course, it followed that what South Carolina had gained in the one instance was equally a fair compensation for what she had lost in the other; the two states, therefore, very sensibly agreed not to disturb either line." File: NC and SC State Line History April 1999 ----- Original Message ----- From: Barbara Farthing Bonham <bbonham@awod.com> To: <NCROOTS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 10:44 PM Subject: [NCROOTS] NC/SC > > > -------- Original Message -------- > From: Ally3729@aol.com > > To: NCROOTS-L@rootsweb.com > > Hi > Could someone tell me what year NC and SC were divided into separate > states > and what was it called before the division? I am looking for relatives > in NC. > Maybe I should be checking both states, since they were once combined as > one > state. > Thanks > > Alice WEST FERGUSON > > Researching Surnames: WEST, BAREFOOT, MATHIS, MCLAMB, DRAUGHON AND > WILLIAMS > > > ==== NCROOTS Mailing List ==== > NOTICE: Discussion on this list is restricted to NORTH CAROLINA GENEALOGY only. > If you're posting a query, include specific dates, locations, etc. if you can. > For comments or list administration questions, contact NCRoots-l-request@rootsweb.com with the > word Help in the subject line. > > ============================== > The RootsWeb WorldConnect Project: > 9.9 million individuals and counting. > http://worldconnect.genealogy.rootsweb.com/ >

    12/16/1999 09:51:07
    1. [NCROOTS] NC/SC
    2. Barbara Farthing Bonham
    3. -------- Original Message -------- From: Ally3729@aol.com To: NCROOTS-L@rootsweb.com Hi Could someone tell me what year NC and SC were divided into separate states and what was it called before the division? I am looking for relatives in NC. Maybe I should be checking both states, since they were once combined as one state. Thanks Alice WEST FERGUSON Researching Surnames: WEST, BAREFOOT, MATHIS, MCLAMB, DRAUGHON AND WILLIAMS

    12/16/1999 08:44:47
    1. [Fwd: Re: [NCROOTS] [Fwd: Humphrey Griffin]]
    2. Barbara Farthing Bonham
    3. -------- Original Message -------- From: Estelledar@aol.com Subject: Re: [NCROOTS] [Fwd: Humphrey Griffin] To: msb@myfamily.org Hi: I do not know if this is yours but I came across a Humphrey GRIFFITH married to an Esther PUGH 1855, in Bertie County. I'm not sure if that is near Martin though. Hope this is something for your Elusive one :) Estelle

    12/16/1999 08:43:22
    1. [NCROOTS] TILLMAN Family Cemetery-Person Co.
    2. Louise T Overton
    3. David Turner TILLMAN and Annie FULCHER TILLMAN Family Cemetery Located 1/4 mile off of Morton-Pulliam Road, (old Harris-Pulliam Road) in the Olive Hill-City Lake area. Mailbox has the number of 1224 Morton-Pulliam Road. Take a dirt road which passes a white house, continue on just a short ways, cemetery is located on the left beside of the old TILLMAN homeplace. Now owned by William G. OAKLEY Jr. Cemetery is well cared for, no fence. May be a few unmarked graves here. Mrs Esther OAKLEY now deceased, said that the first grave here was that of a SOLOMON baby boy. No marker. Graves are scattered, some in rows. When I was a child, trees surrounded this cemetery. When I went back in 1970, Trayham MITCHELL, now deceased, owned this land and later cut down all the trees. He seemed to think there were graves in the woods. If so they have now been destroyed. Jack LONG Foster son of S.C & B.T. TILLMAN Oct 9, 1892-Jan 2, 1957 Mary Edith TILLMAN Daughter of S.C. & B.T. TILLMAN Feb 14, 1911-Oct 21, 1911 Raymond Howard TILLMAN Son of S.C. & B.T. TILLMAN Oct 23, 1912-Oct 24, 1932 Grace Evelyn TILLMAN Daughter of S.C. & B.T. TILLMAN Feb 12, 1907-June 5, 1978 James Otis TILLMAN Son of J.M. & Susie Feb 11, 1902-Nov 17, 1960 Merle TILLMAN Dau of J.M & Susie Sept 24, 1899-Nov 6, 1957 Susie F. TILLMAN Wife of James Monroe Oct 27, 1880-Apr 17, 1980 Pauline WRENN Dau. of J.C. & L.M. WRENN June 15, 1914-July 30, 1915 James Monroe TILLMAN Son of D.T. & Annie F. TILLMAN Sept 19, 1871-1908 Jessie TILLMAN June 18, 1907-Feb 26, 1982 Joe (Joseph) Turner TILLMAN Son of D.T. & A.F. 1868-1874 aged 6 years Ernest J. HARRIS June 5, 1893-Jan 9, 1981 Pearl MITCHELL HARRIS June 25, 1894-Aug 3, 1979 Lisa Louise TATUM Jan 12, 1959-Aug 1, 1982 David Turner HARRIS Jan 15, 1921-Dec 1984 Lucy A. OAKLEY Wife of J.M. OAKLEY Aug 22, 1848-Feb 2, 1900 Nora E. OAKLEY Oct 19, 1878-May 15, 1960 John M. OAKLEY 1857-1924 David Turner TILLMAN Aug 30, 1830-Jan 27, 1906 Annie S. F. TILLMAN April 30, 1836- May 14, 1916 Ruthie PAINTER dau. of C.S. & N.M. Aug 21, 1907-Dec 31, 1907 Leonie PAINTER dau. of C.S. & N.M. Nov 18, 1908-Feb 1909 Naomie PAINTER wife of C.S. April 3, 1886-May 9, 1913 Archie Bart CLAYTON son of Bettie & Bartrell Jan 10, 1906-Aug 24, 1907 Eliza Jane MITCHELL Wife of John MITCHELL June 20, 1866-Sept 19, 1938

    12/16/1999 08:32:15
    1. [NCROOTS] Fw: virus
    2. Joyce Reece
    3. Just so some of you know this came from another mailing list.....just an example Joyce ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chuck Mayfield" <mayfield@airmail.net> To: <CUMBERLAND-RIVER@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 7:40 PM > CNN REPORTS A NEW VIRUS HAS BEEN RECENTLY > DISCOVERED. ONE PERSON CAN PASS IT ON TO MILLIONS > AS IT IS VERY CONTAGIOUS. THE CENTER FOR DISEASE > CONTROL HAS REPORTED THIS WEEK THAT THE VIRUS > SPREADS VERY RAPIDLY FROM ONE PERSON TO THE > NEXT. THEY HAVE PUT A VERY INTERESTING NAME ON THIS VIRUS. IT IS > CALLED....... > > > > A SMILE > > @@@@ > @ _ _ @@ > @@ o o @@ > @@@ ^ @@ > @@@ \__/ @@@ > ) ( > > OH! OH! TOO LATE! > I SEE IT ON YOUR FACE ALREADY! > You've got the virus! > > > ==== CUMBERLAND-RIVER Mailing List ==== > CRR Website; <http://www.rootsweb.com/~kycrrsek/> > McCreary Co GenWeb; <http://www.rootsweb.com/~kymccrea/> > >

    12/16/1999 06:57:57
    1. Fw: [NCROOTS] virus
    2. Joyce Reece
    3. I just thought the folks on other lists might be interested in seeing how the North Carolina list is run and this email was forwarded to those lists. I am on several and most have "no virus" notices, but all, with the exception of the NC one, seldom have anything to say about it. Since there is email abounding today concerning a potential virus and yet others asking what to do about it I had thought the post expedient. Having seen correspondence from you to people on this list in recent days as well as you moderation of this list I have questions concerning this. You "own" this list and you are loosing half your subscribers....either voluntarily or, as in a couple of cases, involuntarily. Out of all the other lists that I subscribe to yours is the only one I have ever seen this much discord on. Whose fault is that? You will probably take this opportunity to ban me from your list also.....you are welcome to do that...I have no problem with it. What I do have a problem with is your chastisements....be they coated in syrup or vinegar. As I stated before. The NC Roots list is the ONLY list I have ever seen with this much control and chastisments of the patrons. Joyce ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barbara Farthing Bonham" <bbonham@awod.com> To: "Joyce Reece" <jreece@icx.net> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 1999 5:22 PM Subject: Re: [NCROOTS] virus > Joyce, > > Rootsweb has a policy that states no viruses are to be discussed on the mailing list. > > Please do not send another one. > > Barbara > > Joyce Reece wrote: > > > While I realize that 99% of the folks on these lists are aware of what virus'es are I constantly see folks that have no idea how to combat them. May I offer a bit of advice to all who have questions. > > > > Anytime a user surfs the internet and downloads anything from e mail to greeting cards there is a possibility of a virus entering your computer. Some can be simply annoying and others can be devasting. The most certain way to combat virus'es is to install an anti-virus program in your computer. First, is should be one that scans your entire computer on start-up. Secondly it shoud be one that is active any time your computer is running so that if one does receive a virus it will catch it immediately. What most people don't understand is that new viruses are created to the average of two per month. If you go to the local "Wal-Mart" and buy a 9.99 anti virus program it will probably catch any one year old virus but will not be capable of catching any virus that has been created since the program was written. So, the important thing to do is to purchase a program that is update-able via the internet. For instance, I use the McAfee Virus-Scan that has provided free updates ! > > for one year. In this manner, if I keep it updated, once the "cure" for a virus is written I am sure that my program will catch them. > > > > Please, for your own sanity (*G*) install an anti- virus program on your computer. It will not only save yours but will keep you from sending it to others. > > > > Also, may I add that many virus warning are hoaxes and people spread panic over them. Once you have a good anti-virus program installed, your manufacturers web sites plus many other sites will routinely post information on any rumors/validity concerning viruses. So, please, before you post a virus warning, be POSITIVE it is valid. > > Joyce > > > > ==== NCROOTS Mailing List ==== > > NOTICE: Discussion on this list is restricted to NORTH CAROLINA GENEALOGY only. > > If you're posting a query, include specific dates, locations, etc. if you can. > > For comments or list administration questions, contact NCRoots-l-request@rootsweb.com with the > > word Help in the subject line. > > > > ============================== > > Free Web space. ANY amount. ANY subject. > > RootsWeb's Freepages put you in touch with millions. > > http://cgi.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/acctform.cgi > > -- > Barbara Farthing Bonham > Summerville SC > The Family Snitch's Web http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~bfbonham > Crawford County PA Genealogy Society http://www.rootsweb.com/~pacrawgs/ > Halifax Co, VA - VAGenWeb http://www.rootsweb.com/~vahalifa/indexhal.htm > > >

    12/16/1999 05:34:20
    1. Re: [NCROOTS] Tillman HAMPTON
    2. Betty
    3. I do not open any attachments, without knowing who sent it. -----Original Message----- From: NCROOTS-L@rootsweb.com <NCROOTS-L@rootsweb.com> To: betty@catt.com <betty@catt.com> Date: Thursday, December 16, 1999 6:12 PM Subject: [NCROOTS] Tillman HAMPTON http://stuart.messagemates.com/index.html Hypercool Happy New Year 2000 funny programs and animations... We attached our recent animation from this site in our mail ! Check it out !

    12/16/1999 05:26:15
    1. [NCROOTS] virus
    2. Joyce Reece
    3. While I realize that 99% of the folks on these lists are aware of what virus'es are I constantly see folks that have no idea how to combat them. May I offer a bit of advice to all who have questions. Anytime a user surfs the internet and downloads anything from e mail to greeting cards there is a possibility of a virus entering your computer. Some can be simply annoying and others can be devasting. The most certain way to combat virus'es is to install an anti-virus program in your computer. First, is should be one that scans your entire computer on start-up. Secondly it shoud be one that is active any time your computer is running so that if one does receive a virus it will catch it immediately. What most people don't understand is that new viruses are created to the average of two per month. If you go to the local "Wal-Mart" and buy a 9.99 anti virus program it will probably catch any one year old virus but will not be capable of catching any virus that has been created since the program was written. So, the important thing to do is to purchase a program that is update-able via the internet. For instance, I use the McAfee Virus-Scan that has provided free updates ! for one year. In this manner, if I keep it updated, once the "cure" for a virus is written I am sure that my program will catch them. Please, for your own sanity (*G*) install an anti- virus program on your computer. It will not only save yours but will keep you from sending it to others. Also, may I add that many virus warning are hoaxes and people spread panic over them. Once you have a good anti-virus program installed, your manufacturers web sites plus many other sites will routinely post information on any rumors/validity concerning viruses. So, please, before you post a virus warning, be POSITIVE it is valid. Joyce

    12/16/1999 02:55:33
    1. [NCROOTS] [Fwd: Rockingham County Alcorns]
    2. Barbara Farthing Bonham
    3. -------- Original Message -------- From: Cindy <jimgoad@hpe.infi.net> To: "NCROOTS-L@rootsweb.com" <NCROOTS-L@rootsweb.com> Will the person needing the Alcorn census info from the Rockingham County Census for 1870, please contact me. I now have the 1870 Census Cindy in NC

    12/16/1999 01:50:35
    1. [NCROOTS] [Fwd: Humphrey Griffin]
    2. Barbara Farthing Bonham
    3. -------- Original Message -------- From: GenieAlice@aol.com To: GRIFFIN-L@rootsweb.com CC: NCROOTS-L@rootsweb.com, NCMARTIN-L@rootsweb.com Hello, I have been off line for a while, but I'm back now and still struggling with my poor lost HUMPHREY GRIFFIN. My Humphrey was born about 1829 and lived around Martin County NC. Has any one run across " anything " about this person?

    12/16/1999 01:49:14