RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. [NCLENOIR] Re:-Barwick
    2. Martha Marble
    3. Hmm. That must be my Lydia. I have the three sons for her but no daughters. Sons, William - my line - , Isaac and James. Proven by a Bible but there is no daughter in the Bible. Which is not to say there wasn't one. Since Rachel was in the household it makes sense she was a daugher. Lydia was married to William Barwick. Lydia was the daughter of Levi and Sarah (Sally) Rouse. William Barwick was the son of John or Joshua Barwick - it is really not clear. In any event he was the grandson of William and Elizabeth Manning the first of the Barwick line in Lenoir Co. Allen, correct me if I am wrong on this information. The 1840 Census supports several females in Lydia's household but is inconsistent with the 1850 Census. THere was a female 10-15. On the 1830 Census, William was still alive but of course, if Rachel was a daughter and her age of 18 in 1850 was correct, she was not born at that time. William died before 1840. Martha >Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 17:49:04 -0700 >X-Original-Sender: cfuller@bellsouth.net Wed Dec 5 17:49:04 2001 >Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 19:48:14 -0500 >From: cfuller <cfuller@bellsouth.net> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-bls40 (Win95; U) >X-Accept-Language: en >Old-To: nclenoir <NCLENOIR-L@rootsweb.com> >Subject: Re: [NCLENOIR] [NCGREENE] Mozingo--Barrow--Barwick >To: NCLENOIR-L@rootsweb.com >Resent-From: NCLENOIR-L@rootsweb.com >X-Mailing-List: <NCLENOIR-L@rootsweb.com> archive/latest/1064 >X-Loop: NCLENOIR-L@rootsweb.com >Resent-Sender: NCLENOIR-L-request@rootsweb.com >Resent-Bcc: > >Martha,Rachel Barwick was in the household of Lydia Barwick 56,James Barwick 21 >and Rachel 18.Neighbors were James Langley,James Herring,John Barrow,Nancy >Herring and Ann Mozingo. >Christine > >Martha Marble wrote: > >> Whose household was Rachel Barwick in on the 1850? >> >> Martha >> >> >Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:21:13 -0700 >> >X-Original-Sender: cfuller@bellsouth.net Wed Dec 5 14:21:12 2001 >> >Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 16:20:16 -0500 >> >From: cfuller <cfuller@bellsouth.net> >> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-bls40 (Win95; U) >> >X-Accept-Language: en >> >Old-To: nclenoir <NCLENOIR-L@rootsweb.com>, List <NCGREENE-L@rootsweb.com> >> >Subject: [NCGREENE] Mozingo--Barrow--Barwick >> >To: NCGREENE-L@rootsweb.com >> >Resent-From: NCGREENE-L@rootsweb.com >> >X-Mailing-List: <NCGREENE-L@rootsweb.com> archive/latest/1736 >> >X-Loop: NCGREENE-L@rootsweb.com >> >Resent-Sender: NCGREENE-L-request@rootsweb.com >> >Resent-Bcc: >> > >> >Well,Seems Rachel Barrow was too young to have married Stephen >> >Mozingo.Rachel Barwick was in the same census--so looking info on her >> >now!!I found Rachel Barrow in 1860 census--but did not find Rachel >> >Barwick--both were in 1850.Stephen and first wife were in 1850 census >> >and he and Rachel were in 1860.Sure was looking forward to finding out >> >all the info of Rachel Barrow!! >> >Christine >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >============================== >> >Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com! >> >http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp >> > >> > > > >

    12/05/2001 01:42:55