Hi Traci, Yes, the images. I wish there were an index, because as you probably know, most of the 1890 census is toast, so I am figuring 1880 as my best bet for finding Lizzie rather than her kids. Thanks for offering to help with the CD...please let me know if it is a lot of trouble, because I don't want you to have to spend hours combing through this stuff if that's what it takes. -Michele At 11:06 AM 6/18/01 -0400, you wrote: >Michele, > >Yes, we subscribe to Ancestry too, and I don't think they've worked all the bugs out of their census images yet. You said you were trying the 1880 census to no avail - do you mean looking through the images? I'm asking because there isn't an 1880 N.C. index on Ancestry. I just today received the entire 1880 U.S. census on CD from the LDS Church, and when I figure out how to load it up, I'll see if I can find anything for you. > >Traci >______________________________________________________ > >From: Michele <moonchld@micro-net.com> >To: NCEDGECO-L@rootsweb.com >Subject: Re: [NCEDGECO] Re: Lees >Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:30:04 -0400 >X-Message: #2 >Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010616102932.045a16c0@popd.ix.netcom.com> > >Thanks, Traci! I appreciate all of the trouble you went to and >will try some of your tips and see if that helps. I got the >Images Online subscription to Ancestry.com, but those Census >records load so slowly on a 56K dialup as to render it almost >worthless. I've been trying the 1880 Census to no avail. >Thanks again for your help. > >-Michele > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > >