--part1_9b.29b167a.26007afb_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --part1_9b.29b167a.26007afb_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: Wrenest25@aol.com From: Wrenest25@aol.com Full-name: Wrenest25 Message-ID: <7a.2b00886.26007a57@aol.com> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:32:07 EST Subject: Re: Wesorts; Nanticokes;WICOMOCO (This is my final ANSWER)!!!!! To: seriesx@netpath.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 66 Hi I am the person that has a Thomas and a Dodd. The Thomas actually is not Indian(or at least doesn't look Indian but his wife was at least half if not full blooded. Ellen's parents were a Faulkner and a Dodd that was a Retherford before marriage.I am going by an application of Ellen's sister that the Retherford that became a Dodd is Indian,she was rejected on the Gunion Miller Roll,but you will usually be accepted by a state recognized tribe if your ancestor was rejected. I think it sometimes depends on when your part of a surname came to this country. The reason I say that is I was told by an Indian historian that Faulkner was adopted by the Delawares and then the name was taken as a Delaware name. We can document our Faulkners to 1775 but if they had come in the 1800's I would not feel they were included in that statement. If this historian is incorrect I would appreciate someone letting me know. Jenny --part1_9b.29b167a.26007afb_boundary--