I think someone is reading a simple question into a criticism and nothing could be farther from the intention. I understand the Digest' numbering system, have been receiving and appreciating for years. My question had to do with numbers interspersed with the Brendy Whites very generous infomation in Vol. #4; Issue #4. The first line reads as follows: "Estate of P.H. McGraw=85on the ____day of Sept. 1906 he died intestate. Nat Hutchinson, John Hutchinson, Paul Huff and Whitney Stuart=20appraisers." All I wanted to know was what the numbers, as in =85 after Mr. McGraw's name and after Whitney Stuart=20 represented.

sorry, I misunderstood your question. I certainly didn't read the question as a criticism and was trying to help. Virginia ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:04 PM Subject: [MSWILKIN] Re: MSWILKIN-D Digest V04 #6 > I think someone is reading a simple question into a criticism and nothing > could be farther from the intention. I understand the Digest' numbering system, > have been receiving and appreciating for years. My question had to do with > numbers interspersed with the Brendy Whites very generous infomation in Vol. #4; > Issue #4. The first line reads as follows: "Estate of P.H. McGraw=85on the > ____day of Sept. 1906 he died intestate. Nat Hutchinson, John Hutchinson, Paul > Huff and Whitney Stuart=20appraisers." > > All I wanted to know was what the numbers, as in =85 after Mr. McGraw's name > and after Whitney Stuart=20 represented. > > > ==== MSWILKIN Mailing List ==== > to Unsubscribe from the digest: > To: [email protected] > Subject: unsubscribe > Message: unsubcribe > > >