Hi Again Lyndell: You know me, checking for everyone that I can. Even when they do not know i am doing it. *VBG* ED [email protected] wrote: > ED, > > I HAD INTENDED THAT FOR KATHY. JUST TRYING FOR INFO ON REMBERT'S AND CASE'S. > > THANKS. > > LYNDELL -- http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey Laird,White,Powhatan

ED, I HAD INTENDED THAT FOR KATHY. JUST TRYING FOR INFO ON REMBERT'S AND CASE'S. THANKS. LYNDELL

Lynn: Not sure if this was meant for me or not. I have a number of Case, but only one Rembert. Her name was Abigail who married Isom Smith. They had children Frances E., Hyghey, and Ophelia dates around 1881 and 1882 the children were born. ED [email protected] wrote: > HELLO, > > I HAVE CASE AND REMBERT. MAYBE WE CAN COMPARE???? > > LYNDELL -- http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey Laird,White,Powhatan

HI KATHY, I SHOULD HAVE SENT THIS DIRECTLY TO YOU. WILL SEND AN E-MAIL TO YOUR SOUTHLOVER ADDRESS. MY REMBERTS AND CASES ARE IN THAT AREA. (LINCOLN, FRANKLIN, COPIAH) I'LL GET WITH YOU THIS PM. HAVE SOMETHING I MUST DO THIS AM. LYNDELL

Who was your post directed to? I have Sutton, Smith, Case, Rembert and others all in Franklin and surrounding counties Kathy

HELLO, I HAVE CASE AND REMBERT. MAYBE WE CAN COMPARE???? LYNDELL

List: Have been under the weather a bit of late. Will try to get active a bit next week. Lots going on this week. ED -- http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey Laird,White,Powhatan

I found this site while doing a Laurinburg, NC search, which is where my Scottish McCormicks first settled. These are wonderful letters, a few back into the 1700's, but most are letters between family members in Laurinburg, NC and Mississippi during the 1800's. It's a McIntyre Family website and the letters include many familiar Scottish names and others, too. For those who have an interest in these areas or like to read things like this.....enjoy. http://www.hal-pc.org/~jdm/DocumentFrames.html Nancy, researching, Doty/Warren/Stringer of MA/VA/NC/GA/MS McCormick/Dawkins/Carmichael of NC/SC/MS Garrett of SC/MS Matthews/Jackson of IL/TN/MO/TX/LA Cain/Garmon/Yancey of GA/TX

One of my cousins has loaned me two telephone books, one a 1946 Vicksburg directory and one a 1948 Hattiesburg directory. I'll have them for a week or so. If anyone would like me to look for a name from either, I'd be happy to. [email protected] Nancy, researching: Doty/Warren/Stringer of MA/VA/NC/GA/MS McCormick/Dawkins/Carmichael of NC/SC/MS Garrett of SC/MS/LA Matthews/Jackson of IL/TN/MO/TX/LA Cain/Garmon of GA/TX

I am related to the Suttons that were primarily from Lawrence and Pike county--descendants of William Sutton thru 2 sons--Joseph Sutton and James Harrison Sutton--in that area of MS I also have CASE SMITH JORDAN CHANDLER REMBERT

Kathy: I hear you. Give me a few days to heal up and we will get on these Suttons I think. ED [email protected] wrote: > I'll take Sutton instead of Sullivan..haha--did I miss something? > > Kathy -- http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey Laird,White,Powhatan

Hi Kathy, Which SUTTON did you need? I have some and maybe I could help. Melba ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, 13 July, 2002 2:34 AM Subject: [MSFRANKL-L] Re: MSFRANKL-SUTTON > I'll take Sutton instead of Sullivan..haha--did I miss something? > > Kathy > >

I'll take Sutton instead of Sullivan..haha--did I miss something? Kathy

Melba: Disregard other email. I see you sent the info here. Thanks, ED -- http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey Laird,White,Powhatan

Melba: You have to help me on this. Not sure what all info is in the book. Trying to find out who is connected to who and as much info on dates as you can come up with. Any way to make a copy of that book? How many pages in it? ED Joanne Donaldson wrote: > Hello Ed, > > Are you talking about the book "Sullivan's Hollow"? What did you need to > know? > > Melba > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Edward J. Hall, Jr." <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, 12 July, 2002 11:34 AM > Subject: [MSFRANKL-L] Excerp from Nancy Brister > > > But most researchers I've run across on the various Rootsweb lists > > don't really have a problem comparable to yours, because they usually > > either don't have as much data and/or they don't find as many people > > who share the same lines as you do. Really, I've been amazed at the > > number of people on the Franklin list who have ties to your lines. > > I've been on many, many lists for about 5 or 6 years now, and it's not > > an everyday situation for people with family ties to "find" each > > other. I've only found a couple of dozen people on ALL my lists and > > message boards combined who are fellow descendants or even from the > > same families......but I can't keep track of how many you've found on > > ONE list!!! > > > > Nancy: > > First off I only am posting a part of the email I asked about sending to > > this list. Reason being, I have contemplated making or getting someone > > to make a list for such a reason as you describe. My other reason is to > > suggest a few ways to some on list to make hits which i feel they may be > > doing or not doing. > > > > Often I have recieved requests for surname/s only with a date of some > > year (maybe) and while I am not wanting to be rude, and I know the > > person who sends such requests is in all honesty just trying to make a > > connection, I think it would help if we tend to list more information on > > children and grandchildren of whomever we ask about, and give as much > > information as possible. I know you think I am hitting a lot of folks > > and have a large data base, and while it is true, the way I find > > information for my data base, is connecting the dots so to speak. I > > have to follow lines of marriages that veer away from my main lines, but > > when I find one that veers back, usually it will include information > > leading up to the one where I was stuck on. Case in point, SULLIVAN we > > have been sharing about. I connect a piece, and someone else had a > > piece, and then I find another, and now I am waiting to hear more from > > Melba on her piece (THAT book which may take us all back a long ways I > > am hoping filling in a lot of gap information.) > > > > So I am wondering if I should make a list or some kind of email > > list...Will wait to see what others think on this. I do not intend to > > post my whole data base on the web. I feel I would not get enough data > > input back to me. Which is why I want to share with everyone. I may be > > slow, and this week I have been paying the cost of my camping weekend, > > (TAKE A NICE SOFT PAD NEXT TIME) at least I am back checking out look > > ups etc. again. > > ED > > > > -- > > http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic > > Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey > > Laird,White,Powhatan > > > > > > -- http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey Laird,White,Powhatan

Hi Ed, I got the book out of it's hiding place and here is what is in the back, in Appendix B on page 85: Thomas Sullivan born 1785, died 1855. First married to Maud Elizabeth Arnold, b. 1790, d. 1846. Their children: James, b. 1810, md. Patsy Rollins. 2 children. Margaret, b. 1812, md. Jake Harvey. Thomas (Hog Tom), b. 1814, md. Elizabeth Bishop. 4 children. Loderick, b. 1816, md. Elizabeth Tuttle - 13 children. Stephen, b. 1816. Owen, b. 1817. Joseph, b. 1818, md. Harriet Wilson. 5 children. Dan, b. 1819. Celia, b. 1820. Thomas married second, Mary Polly Workman, b. 1803, d. 1891. Their children: Frederick, b. 1822. Had one child, John Wiley (Little Wiley). Thomas Jefferson (Jeff), b. 1823. Caroline, b. 1824. Henderson (Hense), b. 1825, md. Leah Howell. 10 children. Eliza Jane, b. 1827. Mark, b. 1830. Wiley (Big Wiley), b. 1832. Mary Ann, b. 1835. Samuel, b. 1838. Cornelius (Conn), b.1838. Loughton, b. 1844. Alexander (Eleck), b. 1847. Clarra (no date). This book doesn't show any of Loderick's children. I hope this helps. Melba ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward J. Hall, Jr." <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 12 July, 2002 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [MSFRANKL-L] Sullivan / Butler > Melba: > Could you list the information on Loderick and Elizabeth Tuttle and also the > children down to Willoughby Sullivan? > ED > > Joanne Donaldson wrote: > > > Hi Robin, > > > > Thank you for the info. I have the book of "Sullivan's Hollow" by Chester > > Sullivan. I found it in 1979. I found a Loderick Sullivan, who was the > > son of Thomas, and he married Elizabeth Tuttle and they had 13 children. > > I had forgotten that I had the book and so I went and found it buried in > > with the rest of my books. > > > > Do you have any more info on them? > > > > Thanks, Melba > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, 06 July, 2002 2:45 PM > > Subject: [MSFRANKL-L] Sullivan / Butler > > > > > Willoughby Sullivan was the son of Lodwick Sullivan. Lodwick was the s/o > > > Thomas Sullivan. I can't seem to find my dates for these people. I do > > know > > > that they were from Sullivan's Hollow in Smith Co. > > > > > > > > -- > http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic > Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey > Laird,White,Powhatan > >

Hello Ed, Are you talking about the book "Sullivan's Hollow"? What did you need to know? Melba ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward J. Hall, Jr." <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 12 July, 2002 11:34 AM Subject: [MSFRANKL-L] Excerp from Nancy Brister > But most researchers I've run across on the various Rootsweb lists > don't really have a problem comparable to yours, because they usually > either don't have as much data and/or they don't find as many people > who share the same lines as you do. Really, I've been amazed at the > number of people on the Franklin list who have ties to your lines. > I've been on many, many lists for about 5 or 6 years now, and it's not > an everyday situation for people with family ties to "find" each > other. I've only found a couple of dozen people on ALL my lists and > message boards combined who are fellow descendants or even from the > same families......but I can't keep track of how many you've found on > ONE list!!! > > Nancy: > First off I only am posting a part of the email I asked about sending to > this list. Reason being, I have contemplated making or getting someone > to make a list for such a reason as you describe. My other reason is to > suggest a few ways to some on list to make hits which i feel they may be > doing or not doing. > > Often I have recieved requests for surname/s only with a date of some > year (maybe) and while I am not wanting to be rude, and I know the > person who sends such requests is in all honesty just trying to make a > connection, I think it would help if we tend to list more information on > children and grandchildren of whomever we ask about, and give as much > information as possible. I know you think I am hitting a lot of folks > and have a large data base, and while it is true, the way I find > information for my data base, is connecting the dots so to speak. I > have to follow lines of marriages that veer away from my main lines, but > when I find one that veers back, usually it will include information > leading up to the one where I was stuck on. Case in point, SULLIVAN we > have been sharing about. I connect a piece, and someone else had a > piece, and then I find another, and now I am waiting to hear more from > Melba on her piece (THAT book which may take us all back a long ways I > am hoping filling in a lot of gap information.) > > So I am wondering if I should make a list or some kind of email > list...Will wait to see what others think on this. I do not intend to > post my whole data base on the web. I feel I would not get enough data > input back to me. Which is why I want to share with everyone. I may be > slow, and this week I have been paying the cost of my camping weekend, > (TAKE A NICE SOFT PAD NEXT TIME) at least I am back checking out look > ups etc. again. > ED > > -- > http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic > Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey > Laird,White,Powhatan > > >

Ed, What connection, if any, is Willoughby Sullivan and the Sullivan Hollow bunch to Monroe Sullivan? I must be missing something. Perhaps Melba's book has all the answers. Tony

Sonya: Opps, you are correct. I guess I was thinking too much of more modern era here. I use to have a good bit of History on Holmesville at one time. By the way, I use to live on Summit-Holmesville Rd. in McComb, Ms. area before moving here to the Mountains of Eastern Washington. You guys should find me in the old phone books. Which reminds me, I wish someone would send an updated phone book of McComb, and Summit, Bogue Chitto etc. area to me. Anyone can help???? Gladly pay postage etc. ED Sonya Johnson wrote: > Ed, > the community of Holmesville is much more important in Mississippi history. > It was the state capitol at one time. > Sonya > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Edward J. Hall, Jr." <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 3:56 PM > Subject: [MSFRANKL-L] Home Safe and Sound > > > List: > > I made it back in one piece. Sore, stiff, all my body aches, (in other > > words grandkids and my kids wore the you know what out of this old man > > and I loved every minute of it.) So I am going to relax a bit. Maybe > > later or tomorrow will get back into the swing...Saw a few good emails I > > want to get into. > > > > Sorry about my Sutton for Sullivan Blunder but saw Cousin Robin set the > > record straight while I was gone. > > > > Someone mentioned the HOLMESVILLE MILL etc. Get a map of Pike County > > off web (internet) Look for Summit-Holmesville...Follow the road...To > > Holmesville...not much there other than the mill at that time. Still > > considered small community outside Summit-McComb, Ms. area. Reason > > being, they did not want the R.R. and so it did not go through > > there..Big mistake on thier planning part at the time. But I will not > > go into that. Reason being I am tired. Later guys, > > > > ED > > > > p.s. to Nancy Brister: May I share your email you sent me with list? > > Purpose to help us all...ED > > > > -- > > http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic > > Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey > > Laird,White,Powhatan > > > > -- http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey Laird,White,Powhatan

But most researchers I've run across on the various Rootsweb lists don't really have a problem comparable to yours, because they usually either don't have as much data and/or they don't find as many people who share the same lines as you do. Really, I've been amazed at the number of people on the Franklin list who have ties to your lines. I've been on many, many lists for about 5 or 6 years now, and it's not an everyday situation for people with family ties to "find" each other. I've only found a couple of dozen people on ALL my lists and message boards combined who are fellow descendants or even from the same families......but I can't keep track of how many you've found on ONE list!!! Nancy: First off I only am posting a part of the email I asked about sending to this list. Reason being, I have contemplated making or getting someone to make a list for such a reason as you describe. My other reason is to suggest a few ways to some on list to make hits which i feel they may be doing or not doing. Often I have recieved requests for surname/s only with a date of some year (maybe) and while I am not wanting to be rude, and I know the person who sends such requests is in all honesty just trying to make a connection, I think it would help if we tend to list more information on children and grandchildren of whomever we ask about, and give as much information as possible. I know you think I am hitting a lot of folks and have a large data base, and while it is true, the way I find information for my data base, is connecting the dots so to speak. I have to follow lines of marriages that veer away from my main lines, but when I find one that veers back, usually it will include information leading up to the one where I was stuck on. Case in point, SULLIVAN we have been sharing about. I connect a piece, and someone else had a piece, and then I find another, and now I am waiting to hear more from Melba on her piece (THAT book which may take us all back a long ways I am hoping filling in a lot of gap information.) So I am wondering if I should make a list or some kind of email list...Will wait to see what others think on this. I do not intend to post my whole data base on the web. I feel I would not get enough data input back to me. Which is why I want to share with everyone. I may be slow, and this week I have been paying the cost of my camping weekend, (TAKE A NICE SOFT PAD NEXT TIME) at least I am back checking out look ups etc. again. ED -- http://www.angelfire.com/art/Photographic Researching:Hall,Turner,Smith,King,Bailey Laird,White,Powhatan