Enough said, thank you. I thought it might help many others to know that Boyer never had a fire and that is a good place to do research. If we had been talking about what we had for dinner or perhaps what we plan to do tomorrow that is one thing but when chatting about the subject at hand, it can help many people and if it is of no interest to you, then use the delete button, that is what it is for. Ruth ----- Original Message ----- From: "jwhaleykzoo" <jwhaleykzoo@gmail.com> To: <mostfran@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [MOSTFRAN] AndrewJacksonWallaceandwifeFrancesCarolineWilsonWallace > In response to Euel B. Lyon's posting which is below, I want to state > that I got a couple of ideas for my genealogical research from the > general chatting. This was despite the fact that the people they were > talking about have nothing to do with my research. What appears > boring and useless to one person might actually have a point to someone > else. I'd like for them to keep chatting in case I can glean something > else. From my perspective, when in doubt, chat. Those who don't > appreciate it can just delete it. > > Beginning with Ms. Shake's posting to the list on 8/25/2010 and > continuing through Ms. Wofford's reply on 8/27/2010, I believe most > people would agree with me that the correspondence to the list was > genealogical in nature and the questions and answer posted to the list > could benefit most people who subscribe to the St. Francois Co., Mo. > list. After that the I would be lying if I thought the last 3 postings > added anything of a genuine genealogical nature to the original > question. I can see Ms. Shake saying "thank you" publicly versus > privately but after that seems like somebody got hold of my late > sister's Chatty Cathy doll and are just pulling her string to here her > talk. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MOSTFRAN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >