In a message dated 5/3/00 2:41:17 PM, nelda.ngs@worldnet.att.net writes: << Supposedly this is how it goes, but please don't ask me to document it all because I don't have much yet. I have not done much work on this line. If you see any errors, I'd sure like to correct them. >> Hi Nelda: Thanks for being the first one to respond to roll call. I think I'd better clear up the documentation issue as I feel some might have misunderstood what I had to say about it. We all have information that we aren't able to document at this time and may never be able to due to lack of a lot of old records. What I was trying to say, is, it's great when we do have documentation. BUT, it's not polite to challenge someone else's information unless your information on the same person/people has documentation. And, any corrections to our information will be cheerfully accepted by all with documentation. Those without formal proof should still through in their information. That can help to sort things out, sometime. On another list I had only 7 siblings of an old relative and through posting what little I knew we are now up to 15 in all from people of the different families. That's a great find as information from people in a line might be a lot closer to correct than from someone who isn't in that line. So, folks, don't be shy and post what you know to be true and ask any questions you have. We have a lot of newbies and a lot of people who do have a lot of reliable information. Smiles to all, Sandi :)