Hi Gang, Just one quick genealogy question to pick your brains, before we do the turkey thing... I have come across my possible line but with one of them, theres a problem.. Its posted that the father died in 1690, but son was born 1720... Of course, this is impossible.. My question IS: Am I missing 1 or 2 generations? Im thinking 1, but can also see where it might be 2.. Ideas, comments, thoughts?? Lanita

If father died and young and had a small child and the child grew up and had a child is the only way I can see that it would not be the second gen. away. Good puzzle. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lanita M" <Lanita@aarcher.com> To: <MO-OREGON-HISTORY-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 11:14 AM Subject: [MO-OREGON-HISTORY] Generations > Hi Gang, > > Just one quick genealogy question to pick your brains, before we do the > turkey thing... > > I have come across my possible line but with one of them, theres a problem.. > > Its posted that the father died in 1690, but son was born 1720... Of course, > this is impossible.. My question IS: > > Am I missing 1 or 2 generations? Im thinking 1, but can also see where it > might be 2.. > > Ideas, comments, thoughts?? > > Lanita >