ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!!!!!! Brock Way <[email protected]> wrote: --- "E.D. Seevers" wrote: > You have no evidence that it > doesn't do harm, yet you are promoting introducing > chemicals onto valuable > information not to mention nature. Firstly, how can I disprove a legend? Am I also going to prove that bigfoot doesn't exist? After all, nobody has proved bigfoot doesn't exist, therefore he must, right? The whole notion that I should provide evidence that it does no harm is a logical fallacy of appealing to lack of proof of the negative. This is a well known logical fallacy. Moreover, I am not promoting using shaving cream. I am pointing out that the assertion that shaving cream harms tombstones is without evidenciary basis. If I point out that saying the alphabet backwards is not dangerous, am I also promoting people saying the alphabet backwards? > Write something > with shaving cream on > your own vehicle or the side of a brick and watch > the results. We are talking about tombstones, not cars. There is no need to pretend that I said it was safe to put shaving cream on anything imaginable. What I said was that there is no evidence that shows the claim that shaving cream harms tombstones is true. Brock Way __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ==== MO-CEMETERIES Mailing List ==== NOTICE: Posting of virus warnings, test messages, chain letters, political announcements, current events, items for sale, personal messages, flames, etc. (in other words - spam) is NOT ALLOWED and will be grounds for removal. Consideration for exceptions, contact Kathleen Burnett [email protected] ============================== Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx Many would be scantily clad if dressed in their own humility. HUGS HUGS HUGS