As far as I know, there were no hotels on Kent Rd. Like I said before, there are just fine older homes that are huge, with many rooms. They have been kept up very nice by their owners even to this day. I would say if your ancestor owned a home on Kent Rd. back in 1939, he was rather wealthy. Of course the other possibility is that he just stayed with another family in one of the homes. Barb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent Summers" <vsummers@nrao.edu> To: <MNSTLOUI-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 10:28 PM Subject: Re: [MNSTLOUI] 15 Kent in 1939 > Yes, that is it. Sorry I forgot to mention that it was Duluth. Are > there mainly homes, and no hotels, etc.? > > Vince > > Barb Werner wrote: > > > > Vince, > > > > Was this in Duluth? There is a Kent Rd. in an upscale part of Duluth > > that has some beautiful old homes on it. > > > > Barb W. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Vincent E. Summers" <vsummers@nrao.edu> > > To: <MNSTLOUI-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 11:32 AM > > Subject: [MNSTLOUI] 15 Kent in 1939 > > > > > My relative died at 15 Kent in the year 1939. He was listed as r, > > > which I gather either means rented or residence! Not sure which. > > > > > > Was this a hotel, home, or what -- does anyone know? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Vince > > > >