Jodi, Thank you, Bonnie

Bonnie, These are the listings for WEEDING in the 1925 Minneapolis telephone book: A.C. WEEDING r.St. Louis Park C.E. WEEDING r.4704 - 5 av S Jodi in Mpls On Sunday, Dec 14, 2003, at 11:00 US/Central, [email protected] wrote: > From: [email protected] > Date: Sat Dec 13, 2003 10:39:37 US/Central > To: [email protected] > Subject: [MNHENNEP] MNHENNEP] JOSEPHSON - 1925 Mpls/St.Paul > > > Jodi, > > If you have time, which Weedings in the 1925 phone book. > > Thank You, > Bonnie

Jodi, If you have time, which Weedings in the 1925 phone book. Thank You, Bonnie

Roxanne, These are the listings for JOSEPHSON in the 1925 Minneapolis Telephone book: Chas. r.3540 - 23 av S John B. r.2515 NE Quincy and in the St. Paul section of the same book: Miss Hilda r.616 Lincoln av H.M. r.340 Fairview av N O. r.435 Maryland your welcome Jodi in Mpls On Tuesday, Dec 9, 2003, at 14:00 US/Central, [email protected] wrote: > From: "Roxanne" <[email protected]> > Date: Mon Dec 8, 2003 15:27:53 US/Central > To: [email protected] > Subject: [MNHENNEP] Josephson in Phone Book > > > Jodi > > Can I please ask if there are any Josephson in the phone book if > there > are can I please have the addresses? > > Thank you > > Roxanne

It has been brought to my attention that I would need to add the city and newspaper to my request. I believe the city would be Minneapolis. But, if there were more than one local paper for that city in 1918, I would be at a loss to guess which one would more likely have wedding announcement write ups in their social pages. Perhaps someone out there would have a suggestion. Earl was a Baptist minister and teacher at a religious college. Thanks again. Leemae Subject: Newspaper marriage lookup Hello, I am new to this list. I am from Michigan, and was hoping that someone would be in position to lookup a possible wedding announcement in whatever newspaper would be in service as of October 16, 1918. I am looking for information on the marriage of Eleanor Mapes and Earl Vaydor Pierce. Thanks for any help. Leemae Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.comGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

Hello, I am new to this list. I am from Michigan, and was hoping that someone would be in position to lookup a possible wedding announcement in whatever newspaper would be in service as of October 16, 1918. I am looking for information on the marriage of Eleanor Mapes and Earl Vaydor Pierce. Thanks for any help. LeemaeGet more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

Tom You might also keep in mind that at that early time in MN history not everyone was buried in a cemetery. My family history includes the burial of my ggggrandmother in "the woods in St Anthony" in 1857 and her husband buried on the family property in 1860. They attempted to locate Deborah's grave to bury her husband next to her but it was impossible so they were buried separately. No record of either - just family history. Jo Hogle

Tom, I don't know what St. Anthony's cemetery you are talking about, but have you tried Sunset Memorial Cemetery. That is a St. Anthony's cemetery. But I don't know when it began. Hope this helps, Good Luck, Micki in Minnesota >From: "Claudia Schuman" <[email protected]> >Reply-To: [email protected] >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [MNHENNEP] Looking for 2 burial in St. Anthony 1858 and >between 1870/80 >Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:47:01 -0600 > >Tom, > >You could try Lakewood Cemetery records online www.lakewoodcemetery.com >and >St. Mary's has some older records online listed on the Hennepin site under >"cemeteries". You also might want to check some of the other cemeteries >listed there. The records for Layman's Cemetery - Pioneers and Soldier's >Cemetery in Minneapolis will soon have the transcriptions online, but they >can be contacted at the number showing on the Hennepin site. > >Claudia Schuman - Coordinator >http://www.rootsweb.com/~mnhennep/ >http://hennbios.tripod.com/index.htm >http://fdlbios.tripod.com/index.htm >http://www.rootsweb.com/~mnscott/index.htm >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tom Gerber" <[email protected]> >To: <[email protected]> >Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:10 PM >Subject: [MNHENNEP] Looking for 2 burial in St. Anthony 1858 and between >1870/80 > > > > I am looking for a > > > > Mary Preisen born 26 July 1844 Germany. The family immigrated in 1855 >and > > appears on the 1860 census in St. Anthony. She is on the ship with the > > family. I don't know if she died before arriving in Minnesota or not. >She > > does not appear to be buried at St. Anthony cemtery with the rest of the > > family. > > > > I am also looking for her brother Thomas born 7 Dec 1841 Germany. He is >on > > the 1870 census but I can't find him on the 1880 census anywhere. He is > > not buried at St. Anthony cemetery either. > > > > The surname was also spelled Prison, Preusen, Prussia, etc. > > > > What other cemeteries should be checked? > > > > Thx > > > > Tom > > > _________________________________________________________________ Tired of slow downloads and busy signals? Get a high-speed Internet connection! Comparison-shop your local high-speed providers here. https://broadband.msn.com

Jodi, Thanks anyway! Bengt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jodi" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:35 PM Subject: [MNHENNEP] OKERSTROM > Bengt, > There is NO listing for either spelling of OKERSTROM. > in the 1925 Minneapolis telephone book. > Sorry, > jodi > > > > On Thursday, Dec 4, 2003, at 01:00 US/Central, > [email protected] wrote: > > > From: Bengt ÷stbom <[email protected]> > > Date: Wed Dec 3, 2003 00:21:27 US/Central > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [MNHENNEP] Scarrott 1925 > > > > > > Hi Jody, > > > > Do you have any Herman Okerstrom (or Okarstrom) in the telephone book? > > > > Bengt > >

This sounds like a wonderful project, but like Mary, I'm not volunteering either. However, I do want to let everyone know how handy it is to have the 1910 census maps she has mentioned (as well as the one for the 1930 census, if working with that year.) Mary is an "expert" on this subject and I agree that having the right map helps anyone trying to make head or tails of the ED's, streets, etc. For those of you who are interested in learning more about the complicated 1910 Minneapolis census situation, her publication will give you the help you need. Start at <www.parkbooks.com> or refer to the specific address in her previous message. I have no affiliation with Park Books, but have used many of their publications over the years and can recommend any one or all. Keep up the good work, Mary. And it doesn't really come as any surprise that one agency (Census Bureau) used one map and another agency (the City) used another...... Karen B. Whitmer

Thx Claudia. I am really looking forward to the Layman's transcriptions online. I am hoping to find other "lost" relatives there. I did check Lakewood online and the St. Mary's stuff online with no luck there. Haven't called ST. Mary's yet. >X-Message: #9 >Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 08:47:01 -0600 >From: "Claudia Schuman" <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [MNHENNEP] Looking for 2 burial in St. Anthony 1858 and >between 1870/80 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Tom, > >You could try Lakewood Cemetery records online www.lakewoodcemetery.com and >St. Mary's has some older records online listed on the Hennepin site under >"cemeteries". You also might want to check some of the other cemeteries >listed there. The records for Layman's Cemetery - Pioneers and Soldier's >Cemetery in Minneapolis will soon have the transcriptions online, but they >can be contacted at the number showing on the Hennepin site. > >Claudia Schuman - Coordinator >http://www.rootsweb.com/~mnhennep/ >http://hennbios.tripod.com/index.htm >http://fdlbios.tripod.com/index.htm >http://www.rootsweb.com/~mnscott/index.htm

I see that you're having trouble with Minneapolis 1910 Federal Census. First off, you should know that I'm not volunteering for anything! The 1910 Minneapolis census is a very interesting one, because there are a bunch of problems over and above the ordinal directions and numbered streets/avenues. The most interesting one is that the map that the Census Bureau used to actually mark the EDs had different Ward and Precinct boundaries on it than did the map that the City used as its official map (in fact, there were more Wards and Precincts on it than were used for elections). When one then tries to use an 'official map' to trace the ED boundaries which correspond with wards, precincts, and street names, one can become VERY confused. In 2001, as part of our census aids project for MN and WI, we were able to locate and publish the boundaries, as they were on the census map itself for 1910. It's a booklet, with a street guide, maps of the city and each individual ward, and the EDs marked. We had done the same thing for St. Paul several years before, and also did Duluth. We've published ED maps for 1930 for those cities, plus Winona and St. Cloud MN (which is in 3 counties) and Milwaukee and Madison, WI. There ARE other resources to solve your problem, and extensive knowledge of the streets of the City of Minneapolis isn't vital-- my publication should provide the info needed! http://www.parkbooks.com/web_store.cgi?page=outlet_frontpage_db.html&cart_id=2341952_4718&keywords=Minneapolis&search_request_button=Search (all one line) Remarkable how having the right map helps! Mary Mary Bakeman Park Genealogical Books, publishers of MN Genealogical Journal e-mail [email protected] WWW http://www.parkbooks.com/

Forwarding a message (see below) regarding a project needing volunteers. If anyone is interested in taking this on, please respond to Joel Weintraub. Thanks, Claudia Schuman ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Weintraub" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:26 AM Subject: 1910 Minneapolis Project... > Claudia, > > I would like you to add a new Project to your list of projects on the > Hennepin County Genweb site....or if you know someone who can take this one, > I would appreciate it. > > Let me introduce myself. I've been involved in making geographical searches > on the US Census easier. I and my volunteers have transcribed the 1930 US > Census....cities over 25,000, and that database forms the basis of Steve > Morse's Search engine (One Step) for that year. See: > http://www.stevemorse.org/census/index.html > > We also transcribed for those cities 1930 to 1920 tables found on NARA T1224 > for 1930 so that if one has an address in 1920 which is also the same place > in 1930, one could with our utility find the 1930 ED for the address and the > 1920 ED as well. > > We are close to opening a new utility...that will have a One Step aid for > some cities in the 1910 US Census. NARA has microfiche M1283 that has > street indexes to ED #s for about 50 cities, and the FamilySearch (LDS) > people have a fiche that has 5 cities on it for 1910 (street indexes) > including Minneapolis. I only have a handful of cities left to do before we > will > make the new site public. > > Which brings me to this email. The LDS people gave me a file for > Minneapolis 1910. This text file has the same information as their > microfiche. I've been trying to get the file in proper format so that I can > include Minneapolis as one of our 1910 One Step cities. It's just been one > big frustration. What I need is for someone who is very familiar with > Minneapolis and has access to old maps, to complete the project. > > Problem is, that the LDS transcribers must have used the Census sheets > directly....without access to a map of the area. So they transcribed any > variation of the name they found on the sheets. > > Ordinarily, when I do such Census sheet transcriptions, I eliminate the > street name modifiers (Ave, Blvd, North, South) because often enumerators > skip those items, and with our method they don't make much of a difference > for most cities. > > Unfortunately, they do make a big difference for Minneapolis that apparently > has numerical Aves and Streets with compass modifiers. If I were to ignore > whether a street is an Ave or a St, or whether it is NE or whatever, > researchers could not get down to only one or a few EDs using the > Minneapolis database. > > I've looked at the boundary descriptions of the 1910 EDs on NARA T1224 for > Minneapolis. I have the 1910 Ward maps shown on one Website. Problem > is that the actual streets I see on the LDS database don't correspond to > either resource. The T1224 descriptions often only show, for ED 137 for > example: "Minneapolis city, Ward 8; Precinct 5" and no street names within > an ED. I've tried to map the EDs on your ward map but the resolution is not > great enough for several areas. How much change has happened in street > names and numbering systems in Minneapolis since 1910? Could I use a modern > map of Minneapolis (like Street Atlas) and at least plot the census > boundaries...to see what the compass modifiers are of streets within a given > area with the assumption that that was the same in 1910? > > To give you some idea of the problem: here is some of the info I'm working > with. Note that I first put all the compass modifiers in brackets and the > street modifiers (Ave, etc.) on the original LDS 1910 Minneapolis file. The > "; ** " is a way of formatting so I can do global replace commands to get it > back to where I want it. This bracketing was before I realized I needed at > least the compass modifiers. > > For example: > ED 144 has: > [W] 33rd; **144. > [W] 32nd [S]; **144. > [W] 32nd; **144. > [W] 32nd Pl; **144. > [W] 34th; **144. > > Now, I've looked at the Ancestry images...and it looks like these Streets > should all be West something (or our format will be to have them something > West)...but there are those funny "S". > > Another 1910 example... > This is the complete ED 137 from the LDS text. Note LDS put their street > index in alphabetical/numerical order, and I've rearranged the data so it's > in ED # sequence. Each line represents a line on the LDS file. In some > cases where the information is redundant, it's there because the address # > range was different...we (One Step) ignore address #s. : > 14th [Ave] [S]; **137. > 1st [Ave] [S]; **137. > 1st; **137. > 27th [E]; **137. > 27th; **137. > 28th [E]; **137. > 29th; **137. > 2nd [Ave]; **137. > 2nd [Ave] [S]; **137. > 2nd; **137. > 3rd [Ave] [S]; **137. > 3rd [Ave]; **137. > 3rd [Ave] [S]; **137. > 3rd; **137. > 3rd; **137. > 5th; **137. > Clinton [Ave]; **137. > Lake [E]; **137. > Nicollet [Ave]; **137. > Nis [Ave]; **137. > Stevens [Ave] [S]; **137. > [E] 28th; **137. > [E] Lake; **137. > > As you can see, it looks like sometimes the enumerator made a number an Ave > and sometimes they didn't... sometimes they added a compass modifier and > sometimes they didn't. Same thing for some of the alphabetical named > Streets... with both E and S streets showing. What a mess. I have no handle > on this problem. I could force all the low numerical streets as Ave S...and > all the high numerical streets (high 20s) as St E.....but..... > > I've changed my mind a number of times on trying to get this city done and > how to clean up the database. I thought at one time that I would just show > what the LDS film has.... but the quality control is gone from our website > if we do this....people expect that if I say 3rd it's not 3rd Ave S. If I > were to include 3rd (St), 3rd Ave, and 3rd Ave S and they are all the same > street, it will create major problems for the One Step search model. > > So, I've decided to exclude right now Minneapolis from the new 1910 Utility > that should be opening up to the public pretty soon. It's unfortunate, as > there is good information for most of the EDs for that city for 1910 on the > LDS fiche. > > What I need is for someone to take on this project, and > correct/augment/revise the database I now have. > > Thanks in advance for any consideration, > > Joel Weintraub > Dana Point, CA > > > >

Tom, You could try Lakewood Cemetery records online www.lakewoodcemetery.com and St. Mary's has some older records online listed on the Hennepin site under "cemeteries". You also might want to check some of the other cemeteries listed there. The records for Layman's Cemetery - Pioneers and Soldier's Cemetery in Minneapolis will soon have the transcriptions online, but they can be contacted at the number showing on the Hennepin site. Claudia Schuman - Coordinator http://www.rootsweb.com/~mnhennep/ http://hennbios.tripod.com/index.htm http://fdlbios.tripod.com/index.htm http://www.rootsweb.com/~mnscott/index.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Gerber" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 9:10 PM Subject: [MNHENNEP] Looking for 2 burial in St. Anthony 1858 and between 1870/80 > I am looking for a > > Mary Preisen born 26 July 1844 Germany. The family immigrated in 1855 and > appears on the 1860 census in St. Anthony. She is on the ship with the > family. I don't know if she died before arriving in Minnesota or not. She > does not appear to be buried at St. Anthony cemtery with the rest of the > family. > > I am also looking for her brother Thomas born 7 Dec 1841 Germany. He is on > the 1870 census but I can't find him on the 1880 census anywhere. He is > not buried at St. Anthony cemetery either. > > The surname was also spelled Prison, Preusen, Prussia, etc. > > What other cemeteries should be checked? > > Thx > > Tom >

I am looking for a Mary Preisen born 26 July 1844 Germany. The family immigrated in 1855 and appears on the 1860 census in St. Anthony. She is on the ship with the family. I don't know if she died before arriving in Minnesota or not. She does not appear to be buried at St. Anthony cemtery with the rest of the family. I am also looking for her brother Thomas born 7 Dec 1841 Germany. He is on the 1870 census but I can't find him on the 1880 census anywhere. He is not buried at St. Anthony cemetery either. The surname was also spelled Prison, Preusen, Prussia, etc. What other cemeteries should be checked? Thx Tom

Received the following e-mail this morning. If anyone out there is willing to check this out and take on the project, please contact Joel Weintraub. Claudia Schuman http://www.rootsweb.com/~mnhennep/ http://hennbios.tripod.com/index.htm http://fdlbios.tripod.com/index.htm http://www.rootsweb.com/~mnscott/index.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Weintraub" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 11:26 AM Subject: 1910 Minneapolis Project... > Claudia, > > I would like you to add a new Project to your list of projects on the > Hennepin County Genweb site....or if you know someone who can take this one, > I would appreciate it. > > Let me introduce myself. I've been involved in making geographical searches > on the US Census easier. I and my volunteers have transcribed the 1930 US > Census....cities over 25,000, and that database forms the basis of Steve > Morse's Search engine (One Step) for that year. See: > http://www.stevemorse.org/census/index.html > > We also transcribed for those cities 1930 to 1920 tables found on NARA T1224 > for 1930 so that if one has an address in 1920 which is also the same place > in 1930, one could with our utility find the 1930 ED for the address and the > 1920 ED as well. > > We are close to opening a new utility...that will have a One Step aid for > some cities in the 1910 US Census. NARA has microfiche M1283 that has > street indexes to ED #s for about 50 cities, and the FamilySearch (LDS) > people have a fiche that has 5 cities on it for 1910 (street indexes) > including Minneapolis. I only have a handful of cities left to do before we > will > make the new site public. > > Which brings me to this email. The LDS people gave me a file for > Minneapolis 1910. This text file has the same information as their > microfiche. I've been trying to get the file in proper format so that I can > include Minneapolis as one of our 1910 One Step cities. It's just been one > big frustration. What I need is for someone who is very familiar with > Minneapolis and has access to old maps, to complete the project. > > Problem is, that the LDS transcribers must have used the Census sheets > directly....without access to a map of the area. So they transcribed any > variation of the name they found on the sheets. > > Ordinarily, when I do such Census sheet transcriptions, I eliminate the > street name modifiers (Ave, Blvd, North, South) because often enumerators > skip those items, and with our method they don't make much of a difference > for most cities. > > Unfortunately, they do make a big difference for Minneapolis that apparently > has numerical Aves and Streets with compass modifiers. If I were to ignore > whether a street is an Ave or a St, or whether it is NE or whatever, > researchers could not get down to only one or a few EDs using the > Minneapolis database. > > I've looked at the boundary descriptions of the 1910 EDs on NARA T1224 for > Minneapolis. I have the 1910 Ward maps shown on one Website. Problem > is that the actual streets I see on the LDS database don't correspond to > either resource. The T1224 descriptions often only show, for ED 137 for > example: "Minneapolis city, Ward 8; Precinct 5" and no street names within > an ED. I've tried to map the EDs on your ward map but the resolution is not > great enough for several areas. How much change has happened in street > names and numbering systems in Minneapolis since 1910? Could I use a modern > map of Minneapolis (like Street Atlas) and at least plot the census > boundaries...to see what the compass modifiers are of streets within a given > area with the assumption that that was the same in 1910? > > To give you some idea of the problem: here is some of the info I'm working > with. Note that I first put all the compass modifiers in brackets and the > street modifiers (Ave, etc.) on the original LDS 1910 Minneapolis file. The > "; ** " is a way of formatting so I can do global replace commands to get it > back to where I want it. This bracketing was before I realized I needed at > least the compass modifiers. > > For example: > ED 144 has: > [W] 33rd; **144. > [W] 32nd [S]; **144. > [W] 32nd; **144. > [W] 32nd Pl; **144. > [W] 34th; **144. > > Now, I've looked at the Ancestry images...and it looks like these Streets > should all be West something (or our format will be to have them something > West)...but there are those funny "S". > > Another 1910 example... > This is the complete ED 137 from the LDS text. Note LDS put their street > index in alphabetical/numerical order, and I've rearranged the data so it's > in ED # sequence. Each line represents a line on the LDS file. In some > cases where the information is redundant, it's there because the address # > range was different...we (One Step) ignore address #s. : > 14th [Ave] [S]; **137. > 1st [Ave] [S]; **137. > 1st; **137. > 27th [E]; **137. > 27th; **137. > 28th [E]; **137. > 29th; **137. > 2nd [Ave]; **137. > 2nd [Ave] [S]; **137. > 2nd; **137. > 3rd [Ave] [S]; **137. > 3rd [Ave]; **137. > 3rd [Ave] [S]; **137. > 3rd; **137. > 3rd; **137. > 5th; **137. > Clinton [Ave]; **137. > Lake [E]; **137. > Nicollet [Ave]; **137. > Nis [Ave]; **137. > Stevens [Ave] [S]; **137. > [E] 28th; **137. > [E] Lake; **137. > > As you can see, it looks like sometimes the enumerator made a number an Ave > and sometimes they didn't... sometimes they added a compass modifier and > sometimes they didn't. Same thing for some of the alphabetical named > Streets... with both E and S streets showing. What a mess. I have no handle > on this problem. I could force all the low numerical streets as Ave S...and > all the high numerical streets (high 20s) as St E.....but..... > > I've changed my mind a number of times on trying to get this city done and > how to clean up the database. I thought at one time that I would just show > what the LDS film has.... but the quality control is gone from our website > if we do this....people expect that if I say 3rd it's not 3rd Ave S. If I > were to include 3rd (St), 3rd Ave, and 3rd Ave S and they are all the same > street, it will create major problems for the One Step search model. > > So, I've decided to exclude right now Minneapolis from the new 1910 Utility > that should be opening up to the public pretty soon. It's unfortunate, as > there is good information for most of the EDs for that city for 1910 on the > LDS fiche. > > What I need is for someone to take on this project, and > correct/augment/revise the database I now have. > > Thanks in advance for any consideration, > > Joel Weintraub > Dana Point, CA > > > >

Jodi Can I please ask if there are any Josephson in the phone book if there are can I please have the addresses? Thank you Roxanne

Larayne, There are NO listings for DOSWELL in the 1925 Minneapolis telephone book. These are the listings for J. CAREY in the 1925 Minneapolis telephone book: CAREY, J.A. 4922 - 30 av S CAREY, Mrs. Jas 1514 Wash av N CAREY, Jas B. phys&surg 1009 Nic av CAREY, J.B. phys&surg r.3539 Garfield av CAREY, J.H. 4428 Zenith av S hope this helps, Jodi in Minneapolis On Friday, Dec 5, 2003, at 10:00 US/Central, [email protected] wrote: > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu Dec 4, 2003 13:29:44 US/Central > To: [email protected] > Subject: [MNHENNEP] CAREY 1925 Mpls directory > > > Jodi, > Do you find a Jessie (Elizabeth) CAREY (Mrs. James Carey) or any > "DOSWELL" surname in the 1924 Mpls.phone directory? > Thanks very much, > Larayne in WA >

Eleanor, These are the listing for W. FORSYTH in the 1925 Minneapolis telephone book: FORSAITH, W.A. 2610 W 41 FORSYTH, W.H. 5212 Xerxes av S. FORSYTHE, E.L. 1410 - 29 av NE FORSYTHE, W. 911 W 34 FORSYTHE, Wm. J. 3956 - 24 av S Happy hunting, Jodi in Minneapolis On Friday, Dec 5, 2003, at 10:00 US/Central, [email protected] wrote: > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu Dec 4, 2003 09:24:31 US/Central > To: [email protected] > Subject: [MNHENNEP] 1924 Phone Book > > > Jodi, do you have a William or Elizabeth FORSYTH listed? Thanks. > Eleanor in > KY

Fred, There are 21 listings for BENJAMIN in the 1925 Minneapolis telephone book: A.N Arthur E. Chas. S. D.A. David J. Dry Goods Store Earle S. E.G. Erle W. F.W. G.W. I. Iron & Metal Co. Jack J. J.H. Lyle L. M. M.M. R.P. W.D. W.G Best of luck, Jodi in Minneapolis On Thursday, Dec 4, 2003, at 01:00 US/Central, [email protected] wrote: > From: [email protected] > Date: Wed Dec 3, 2003 23:47:51 US/Central > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MNHENNEP] Scarrott 1925 > > > Do you have any BENJAMIN's listed in your 1925 Telephone book. Thanks > > Fred A. Benjamin