Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [MNGEN] USGenWeb Requirements
    2. Mike Peterson via (Dino)
    3. On all my pages I have the current logo which contains a link to the state page. On my main page, I also have the banner Kermit designed ( the Kermit designed banner on this page - https://sites.google.com/site/mngenproject/how-to-volunteer/adopt-a-county/logo-contest-1/logo-contest-banners – is not the latest as it doesn’t have the word The in it ). On the banner I have on my main page, it contains a link to the state page. As I understand the below, I should remove the link from the banner but I can still display the banner. Mike Clay Co From: Karen De Groote via Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 8:35 AM To: List MNGenWeb Subject: Re: [MNGEN] USGenWeb Requirements Another good question John, let me clarify. There are three aspects to this situation. 1. USGenWeb requirements state we must all have a link to the state project on our index pages. 2. We voted in an official MNGenWeb logo, hence IF you use a logo, it must be the official one. We made that rule as a collective. You cannot link the banner to the state pages on the index page as that turns it in to the logo. 3. Some people use a text link to the state pages which is fine under current rules. Can you use a text link and then the banner solely for decoration? I don't think so. The banner that matches the official logo contains the part of the official logo which would create a misuse of the official logo itself on the index page but I will leave it to the SCs to comment on using a banner that was not voted on when we voted on the logo, as decoration in absence of a logo and a simple text link to the state. Using a banner instead of the official logo on our pages confuses our visitors and makes the branding of our project more difficult. I think after all the work that was done and the voting everyone partook in that we would all be proud of our official logo and use it. I hope that clears up the confusion and not makes the waters any more muddy. Karen ASC MNGenWeb On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:12 AM, John Van Essen via <[email protected]> wrote: > Karen, > > In your original email of March 19, item #8 implied that the use of a > logo was optional - "If you use a logo ...". > > So now you are saying the official logo *must* be on the index page - > "our official logo needs to be there as well". Or does that apply > only if there's a banner? It seems ambiguous. > > And where is this requirement regarding the state logo to be found? > It's not on the USGenWeb Guidelines page, and as far as I know, > MNGenWeb has no Bylaws, so I'm wondering who is making these rules. > > Anyway, I left the banner as is and added a logo in the About section > where I explained what MNGenWeb is. Seems appropriate there. :) > > John > > > On Mar 30, 2015, at 07:55, Karen De Groote wrote: > >> Great question John. When we all voted for the official logo, that >> became the official logo. Banners are just that, banners. Now there >> is no problem with decorating with banners, even on the index page but >> our official logo needs to be there as well. Kermit reworked the old >> Pennau banner to be in compliance with the name so we can use itd. It >> does not contain the official logo. Keith chose to add a banner to >> the logos page that DOES incorporate the official logo, however we did >> not vote to have a banner as an official logo so it is still a banner >> not a logo. >> >> I hope that makes sense and I imagine Shirley and Tim will explain >> maybe a bit better. Thanks for the question. >> Karen >> ASC MNGenWeb >> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:19 AM, John Van Essen via <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mar 19, 2015, at 19:55, Karen De Groote via wrote: >>> >>>> The leadership team will begin reviewing their counties at the end of >>>> this 10 day period for the basic requirements ... >>> >>> Okay - so that period is up! I have a question about the logo rules. >>> >>>> 8. All county sites must provide a link to the state site. ... >>>> Here is the page with our official logo >>>> and the acceptable banner that can be used on other pages that are NOT >>>> the index page: http://rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mngenweb/logo.htm. >>>> This is an area that we have problems with in this project. Some are >>>> using the old logo and some are using the the new BANNER on the index >>>> page for a logo rather than the official logo. ... >>> >>> So by "old logo" you are referring to the Pennau banner with Minnesota >>> spelled out, which is not in compliance with USGenWeb rules for state >>> logos. By "new BANNER", you are referring to the re-formatted Pennau >>> banner on the above page, also not suitable as a logo. >>> >>> Since the Kittleson banner on the Logo Sets page: >>> >>> http://rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mngenweb/MNGenWeb%20Logo%20Sets.html >>> >>> incorporates the official logo and was not specifically forbidden >>> and the use of a logo is *optional*, I have chosen to replace the >>> old Pennau logo with the exact same-size Kittleson banner, and still >>> linking it to the MNGenWeb page. >>> >>> So I'm looking for affirmation that what I have here is acceptable: >>> >>> http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mncrowwi/ >>> >>> It looks swell! >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> John Van Essen, Crow Wing county > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    03/31/2015 04:45:45
    1. Re: [MNGEN] USGenWeb Requirements
    2. Shirley Cullum via
    3. Mike, The link you provided is to the temporary state page that has been discontinued. The state page is at http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mngenweb/ and the logo page at http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mngenweb/logo.htm shows the corrected banner with MNGenWeb spelled correctly. Shirley On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Mike Peterson via <[email protected]> wrote: > On all my pages I have the current logo which contains a link to the state > page. On my main page, I also have the banner Kermit designed ( the Kermit > designed banner on this page - > https://sites.google.com/site/mngenproject/how-to-volunteer/adopt-a-county/logo-contest-1/logo-contest-banners > – is not the latest as it doesn’t have the word The in it ). On the banner > I have on my main page, it contains a link to the state page. As I > understand the below, I should remove the link from the banner but I can > still display the banner. > Mike > Clay Co > > From: Karen De Groote via > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 8:35 AM > To: List MNGenWeb > Subject: Re: [MNGEN] USGenWeb Requirements > > Another good question John, let me clarify. There are three aspects > to this situation. > 1. USGenWeb requirements state we must all have a link to the state > project on our index pages. > 2. We voted in an official MNGenWeb logo, hence IF you use a logo, it > must be the official one. We made that rule as a collective. You > cannot link the banner to the state pages on the index page as that > turns it in to the logo. > 3. Some people use a text link to the state pages which is fine under > current rules. Can you use a text link and then the banner solely for > decoration? I don't think so. The banner that matches the official > logo contains the part of the official logo which would create a > misuse of the official logo itself on the index page but I will leave > it to the SCs to comment on using a banner that was not voted on when > we voted on the logo, as decoration in absence of a logo and a simple > text link to the state. > > Using a banner instead of the official logo on our pages confuses our > visitors and makes the branding of our project more difficult. I > think after all the work that was done and the voting everyone partook > in that we would all be proud of our official logo and use it. I hope > that clears up the confusion and not makes the waters any more muddy. > > Karen > ASC MNGenWeb > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:12 AM, John Van Essen via <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Karen, > > > > In your original email of March 19, item #8 implied that the use of a > > logo was optional - "If you use a logo ...". > > > > So now you are saying the official logo *must* be on the index page - > > "our official logo needs to be there as well". Or does that apply > > only if there's a banner? It seems ambiguous. > > > > And where is this requirement regarding the state logo to be found? > > It's not on the USGenWeb Guidelines page, and as far as I know, > > MNGenWeb has no Bylaws, so I'm wondering who is making these rules. > > > > Anyway, I left the banner as is and added a logo in the About section > > where I explained what MNGenWeb is. Seems appropriate there. :) > > > > John > > > > > > On Mar 30, 2015, at 07:55, Karen De Groote wrote: > > > >> Great question John. When we all voted for the official logo, that > >> became the official logo. Banners are just that, banners. Now there > >> is no problem with decorating with banners, even on the index page but > >> our official logo needs to be there as well. Kermit reworked the old > >> Pennau banner to be in compliance with the name so we can use itd. It > >> does not contain the official logo. Keith chose to add a banner to > >> the logos page that DOES incorporate the official logo, however we did > >> not vote to have a banner as an official logo so it is still a banner > >> not a logo. > >> > >> I hope that makes sense and I imagine Shirley and Tim will explain > >> maybe a bit better. Thanks for the question. > >> Karen > >> ASC MNGenWeb > >> > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:19 AM, John Van Essen via <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> On Mar 19, 2015, at 19:55, Karen De Groote via wrote: > >>> > >>>> The leadership team will begin reviewing their counties at the end of > >>>> this 10 day period for the basic requirements ... > >>> > >>> Okay - so that period is up! I have a question about the logo rules. > >>> > >>>> 8. All county sites must provide a link to the state site. ... > >>>> Here is the page with our official logo > >>>> and the acceptable banner that can be used on other pages that are NOT > >>>> the index page: http://rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mngenweb/logo.htm. > >>>> This is an area that we have problems with in this project. Some are > >>>> using the old logo and some are using the the new BANNER on the index > >>>> page for a logo rather than the official logo. ... > >>> > >>> So by "old logo" you are referring to the Pennau banner with Minnesota > >>> spelled out, which is not in compliance with USGenWeb rules for state > >>> logos. By "new BANNER", you are referring to the re-formatted Pennau > >>> banner on the above page, also not suitable as a logo. > >>> > >>> Since the Kittleson banner on the Logo Sets page: > >>> > >>> http://rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mngenweb/MNGenWeb%20Logo%20Sets.html > >>> > >>> incorporates the official logo and was not specifically forbidden > >>> and the use of a logo is *optional*, I have chosen to replace the > >>> old Pennau logo with the exact same-size Kittleson banner, and still > >>> linking it to the MNGenWeb page. > >>> > >>> So I'm looking for affirmation that what I have here is acceptable: > >>> > >>> http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~mncrowwi/ > >>> > >>> It looks swell! > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >>> > >>> John Van Essen, Crow Wing county > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >

    03/31/2015 07:54:05