Karen, You and I agree on this subject 100%. Communication is the key to a successful project. and during the regeneration of the Project there are going to be, by necessity quite a bit of discussion involved! Laverne On 2/16/2015 2:33 PM, Karen De Groote via wrote: > Long before MNGenWeb lost their leadership team, there were many counties > that were stagnant and missing. During this time it was peace and quiet as > Tim has mentioned. Perhaps if there was no peace and quiet those counties > would be updated or not missing? I LOVE talking to other CCs and get loads > of ideas from others and what they are doing on their sites. We don't need > to hide our candles under the bushel basket and it is truly sad to me that > any fellow CC does not want basic rules or talking on this list. Yes I can > understand inappropriate posts like someone's grandbaby or spouse doing > something noteworthy. I would be the first to complain about that but > these posts are project business and CCs need a voice. > > I know that this profuse amount of email right now is a temporary thing and > it will calm down eventually but I do not want ANYONE thinking they cannot > ask a question of their fellow CCs on this list or share something they > have discovered. It will not go back to the years of no emails ever again > and that is a good thing. This list is for official project business and > with lots of business comes lots of emails. > > Karen > Becker, Todd and Stearns > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Timothy Stowell via <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> In other states I host counties in we have occasional roll calls, nearly >> zero messages on the state list other than announcements about national >> events that we mostly ignore. Why? Because it bears no relevance to our >> hosting a county. Occasionally someone finds something to share, then the >> list goes silent. We like it that way. >> >> I counted one state's emails for 2014 there were approximately 190 emails >> for the year. I read three because the rest were not pertinent to the >> counties I host or the subject matter was of no interest to me. In the >> other less than 30 of which I wrote several. I continue with my counties >> and rarely look at the surrounding counties because I have enough material >> for my sites. If I come across material for other counties, I inform the >> host of said county who is free to either accept or reject the data. >> >> All of the past history is moot except to say that over the number of years >> before the SC/ASC ceased to participate, we were a very quiet group. We >> either felt no need to communicate or there was nothing to be said. We >> just did our county sites, which is what we volunteered to do. >> >> Tim >> >> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Laverne H. Tornow <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Clearly until the National Coordinator stepped in, this project did not >>> communicate. >>> >>> Arpril 2014- 1 message that was a spam, and not another until October >> when >>> the NC took over. >>> October 2013 - 1 message, request for help from Keith Gulsvig to which >> NO >>> ONE replied! and none between October 2013 and April 2014 >>> October 2011 there were 21 messages relating to a temp ASC being >> appointed >>> by the NC, there wre no other messages for that year. >>> from Nov 2011 to October 2013 there were no messages >>> December 2010 there were 4 messages and none between that time and >> October >>> 2011 >>> >>> There are maybe 1 or 2 messages per year....... That is a project that >>> does not communicate! >>> >>> Laverne >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >