Note to all MILLS researchers: Have seen that several of you out there, claim "THE GEORGE" as your progenitor of your family MILLS lines. However, go to _http://freepages.family.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~crrking/mills/mills_dna.hrm_ (http://freepages.family.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~crrking/mills/mills_dna.hrm) go to DNA results pages. See list of so far those DNA samples tested and names of ancestors claimed with dates, etc. Click on ancestor name, take to pedigree as submitted with DNA sample for paper trail. However, if you group all of you together as being descendant of George, and also that of the John's, son of John and Mary's, you will see that the DNA results marker/loci/haplo groups DO NOT MATCH. NOT EVEN CLOSE. Even with slight mutation, still too far off. DOES ANY ONE HAVE ANY DOCUMENTED PROOF WHERE GEORGE WAS ACTUALLY BORN??? HAMLET - VILLAGE - TOWN - ESTATE ??? DOES ANY ONE TRULY HAVE PROOF CONCRETE, IRREFUTABLE, that he came from West or as some have him NORTH RIDING, YORKSHIRE ENGLAND. Not sure if every one has noticed or not, but I have put some of these together on a DNA MILLS file, and they do not match up. I am not saying, "Throw out the baby with the bath water, just yet",meaning that all your research is incorrect. Just that with all that we now have at our disposal, DNA Testing being one, etc. Our ancestral roots can be discovered a little more easily. And clarity will show it self. Pat cw **************Psssst...Have you heard the news? There's a new fashion blog, plus the latest fall trends and hair styles at StyleList.com. (http://www.stylelist.com/trends?ncid=aolsty00050000000014)