The register of marriages which was Guildhall Library Ms4546 does not have a gap after 1741, or at least did not when W. Challen made a transcript of it in the 1930s. This transcript (which is still at the Guildhall Library) was used by Boyd to compile his index to London marriages, which index is also available on Origins. If the marriage is not in that section therefore it was not at St Mary at Hill. I assume the 'gap' 1741-54 is just due to Ancestry missing some pages in the digitisation, far, I fear, an unprecedented event!! Regards Cliff

I've just this minute checked the film of Ms.4546/1 at LMA, and I can confirm that Ancestry have missed two pages (a single opening). These pages contain all the marriages recorded at St Mary at Hill between 1742 and 1753, but unfortunately the marriage that Santa is looking for is not found there. HTH Judy London, UK --- On Thu, 16/9/10, Cliff Webb <cliffwebbhistorian@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > From: Cliff Webb <cliffwebbhistorian@yahoo.co.uk> > The register of marriages which was Guildhall Library > Ms4546 does not have a gap > after 1741, or at least did not when W. Challen made a > transcript of it in the > 1930s. This transcript (which is still at the Guildhall > Library) was used by > Boyd to compile his index to London marriages, which index > is also available on > Origins. If the marriage is not in that section therefore > it was not at St Mary > at Hill. I assume the 'gap' 1741-54 is just due to Ancestry > missing some pages > in the digitisation, far, I fear, an unprecedented event!! > Regards > Cliff