Thanks to all who have responded. It has been a very illuminating discussion. Even though my quarry does not appear there, it is well worth knowing that the records that Ancestry did not pick up indeed appear in Boyd's. Santa T. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cliff Webb" <cliffwebbhistorian@yahoo.co.uk> To: <middlesex_county_uk@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 7:52 AM Subject: Re: [MDX] St Mary at Hill > > > The register of marriages which was Guildhall Library Ms4546 does not have > a gap > after 1741, or at least did not when W. Challen made a transcript of it in > the > 1930s. This transcript (which is still at the Guildhall Library) was used > by > Boyd to compile his index to London marriages, which index is also > available on > Origins. If the marriage is not in that section therefore it was not at St > Mary > at Hill. I assume the 'gap' 1741-54 is just due to Ancestry missing some > pages > in the digitisation, far, I fear, an unprecedented event!! > Regards > Cliff > > > > ************************************** > Send your List messages using **PLAIN TEXT** and always **TRIM AWAY** > superfluous old messages in replies. > > List Admin can be contacted at: Middlesex_County_UK-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MIDDLESEX_COUNTY_UK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >