Thanks Judy for helping me rule out this possibility! Santa T. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Judy Lester" <jlester@btinternet.com> To: <middlesex_county_uk@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [MDX] St Mary at Hill > I've just this minute checked the film of Ms.4546/1 at LMA, and I can > confirm that Ancestry have missed two pages (a single opening). These > pages contain all the marriages recorded at St Mary at Hill between 1742 > and 1753, but unfortunately the marriage that Santa is looking for is not > found there. > > HTH > > Judy > London, UK > > --- On Thu, 16/9/10, Cliff Webb <cliffwebbhistorian@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> From: Cliff Webb <cliffwebbhistorian@yahoo.co.uk> > >> The register of marriages which was Guildhall Library >> Ms4546 does not have a gap >> after 1741, or at least did not when W. Challen made a >> transcript of it in the >> 1930s. This transcript (which is still at the Guildhall >> Library) was used by >> Boyd to compile his index to London marriages, which index >> is also available on >> Origins. If the marriage is not in that section therefore >> it was not at St Mary >> at Hill. I assume the 'gap' 1741-54 is just due to Ancestry >> missing some pages >> in the digitisation, far, I fear, an unprecedented event!! >> Regards >> Cliff > > > ************************************** > Send your List messages using **PLAIN TEXT** and always **TRIM AWAY** > superfluous old messages in replies. > > List Admin can be contacted at: Middlesex_County_UK-admin@rootsweb.com > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MIDDLESEX_COUNTY_UK-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >