Daundra wrote: >**Also a family member of ours has made an intresting and important >observation regarding the Claypool infant buried at Johnson. The bible that >my father-in-law had stated "Baby Claypool, born to early, 1831" Dad >Webster took us to the grave site and pointed it out. >Here is the delema...George and Fanny Claypool were married in May 1831. >They had the mentioned baby in 1831, supposedly summer, according to dad >Webster. Summer was not noted in the Bible. Their son Daniel was born in >1831, according to his age stated in the census records, that would have made >him a premature infant also (7mo). I have 1832 from the Bible. DONT YOU >JUST LOVE IT. Just another one of thoes little family mysteries. Well, a good friend of mine espouses the adage: "First babies can come at any time. All others take nine months." :-) Coralie Allen