I commend "NPM" for a model reply, which recognizes the importance or accuracy, evidence, and understanding by each of us - very kindly and diplomatically explained - with education, by a fine explanation. We agree that PLT stands for plaintiff and on the definition of Execution. Since the correction applies to the last six lines, below, I've re-named this portion of the exchange "evidence -> judgment -> execution ...", as it's separate from the principal msg., praise for www.cindyslist.com. Yes, thanks. You're completely right, particularly in challenging for a "preponderance of evidence", which marks you, NPM, a real pro.! The last six lines of this message repeat a cryptic abbreviation from a prior message on another thread, followed by my facetious note which, if shared at all, would have better been in different topic. Cheers! ~ Ted Chadbourne ----- Original Message ----- From: "N P Maling" <npmaling@zipcon.net> To: <MEYORK-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 10:32 AM Subject: Re: [MEYORK] Cyndi's List = www.cyndislist.com has served 32 million genealogical queries!+ Saco/Biddeford + executed > Are you convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the index > entry you are referring to is a CRIMINAL case? Where is the > preponderance of evidence to show that this index entry is a > criminal case instead of a civil case? In a civil case the > JUDGMENT would be executed. > > NPM > > On 18 Feb 2003 at 22:28, Ted Chadbourne wrote about > [MEYORK] Cyndi's List = www.cyndislist.com [quoting a prior message] with a full quoteback, about these lines: > > "PLT 600691 CCP 10-137 Execution 1734 7" * > > ~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~ > > ^ > > *^ Looked cryptic at first glance, but if we're going to execute > > defendants in our great land, balanced justice <g> may conclude > > that a few plaintiffs ('PLT' above) may also deserve "Execution".