Hi John, Sorry you're having trouble contacting her. She may be having problems with her husband. He has not been well for quite a while. Her phone number is 1-636-624-6101. Don ________________________________ From: John Dobricky <john.dobricky@gmail.com> To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com Sent: Mon, February 25, 2013 11:05:22 AM Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY] Zachariah Peacock Hi Don. I have not heard back from my e-mail to Ms. Obrist about the Drury book. Do you have a phone number for her? John D. On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Donald Drury <ddrury5840@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've been studying the census data for Zachariah Peacock (christened 1773) for > the years 1800, 1810, and 1820. > > > They list the following: > > Males Females > > 1800 1 16-26 2 under 10 > 1 26-44 1 26-44 > > 1810 1 under 10 1 under 10 > 1 26-44 2 10-16 > 1 26-44 > > 1820 1 16-26 1 10-15 > 1 over 44 1 over 44 > > I think these individuals can be identified as follows: > > 1800 1 male 16-26 Zachariah Peacock 25 years old > 1 male 26-44 Probably either a brother or his father > 2 females under 10 children of Zachariah and Elizabeth Joy > 1 female 26-44 Elizabeth Joy > > 1810 1 male under 10 Probably John Sylvester Peacock > 1 male 26-44 Zachariah Peacock > 1 female under 10 d/o Zachariah and Jane Drury (Prob b. 1804) > 2 females 10-15 Probably children of Zachariah and Elizabeth Joy > 1 female 26-44 Probably Jane Drury > > 1820 1 male 16-26 Probably John Sylvester Peacock > 1 male over 44 Zachariah Peacock > 1 female 10-15 d/o Zachariah and Jane Drury (Prob b. 1804) > 1 female over 45 Elizabeth Norris > > The 2 girls under 10 in 1800 had to be born between 1791 and 1800. I am > assuming that the two girls 10 to 15 in 1810 are the same 2 who were under 10 >in > 1800. If they were as old as 15 in 1810 then the earliest they could have been > born would have been 1795. Therefore these two were born between 1795 and 1800. > But since Zachariah Peacock did not marry Elizabeth Joy until 1797 we can say > they were born between 1797 and 1800. > > In 1810 we have an additional female under 10. This means she was born > between 1800 and 1810. This same female appears in the 1820 census as being > between 10 and 15. If she was as old as 15 in 1820 then the earliest she could > have been born would have been 1805. This means she was probably born between > 1805 and 1810 and establishes her as a d/o Jane Drury. > > Can anyone add any additional data to help identify these people? > > I'd appreciate comments on my analysis or my conclusions. > > Thanks for anything you can provide. > > Don Drury > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in >the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message