Hi Don. Thanks! I tried to call the number you sent but got a recording saying it is a "non-working number." All suggestions welcome. John D. On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Donald Drury <ddrury5840@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Hi John, > > Sorry you're having trouble contacting her. She may be having problems with her > husband. He has not been well for quite a while. Her phone number is > 1-636-624-6101. > > > Don > > > > > ________________________________ > From: John Dobricky <john.dobricky@gmail.com> > To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com > Sent: Mon, February 25, 2013 11:05:22 AM > Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY] Zachariah Peacock > > Hi Don. I have not heard back from my e-mail to Ms. Obrist about the > Drury book. Do you have a phone number for her? John D. > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Donald Drury <ddrury5840@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I've been studying the census data for Zachariah Peacock (christened 1773) for >> the years 1800, 1810, and 1820. >> >> >> They list the following: >> >> Males Females >> >> 1800 1 16-26 2 under 10 >> 1 26-44 1 26-44 >> >> 1810 1 under 10 1 under 10 >> 1 26-44 2 10-16 >> 1 26-44 >> >> 1820 1 16-26 1 10-15 >> 1 over 44 1 over 44 >> >> I think these individuals can be identified as follows: >> >> 1800 1 male 16-26 Zachariah Peacock 25 years old >> 1 male 26-44 Probably either a brother or his father >> 2 females under 10 children of Zachariah and Elizabeth Joy >> 1 female 26-44 Elizabeth Joy >> >> 1810 1 male under 10 Probably John Sylvester Peacock >> 1 male 26-44 Zachariah Peacock >> 1 female under 10 d/o Zachariah and Jane Drury (Prob b. 1804) >> 2 females 10-15 Probably children of Zachariah and Elizabeth Joy >> 1 female 26-44 Probably Jane Drury >> >> 1820 1 male 16-26 Probably John Sylvester Peacock >> 1 male over 44 Zachariah Peacock >> 1 female 10-15 d/o Zachariah and Jane Drury (Prob b. 1804) >> 1 female over 45 Elizabeth Norris >> >> The 2 girls under 10 in 1800 had to be born between 1791 and 1800. I am >> assuming that the two girls 10 to 15 in 1810 are the same 2 who were under 10 >>in >> 1800. If they were as old as 15 in 1810 then the earliest they could have been >> born would have been 1795. Therefore these two were born between 1795 and > 1800. >> But since Zachariah Peacock did not marry Elizabeth Joy until 1797 we can say >> they were born between 1797 and 1800. >> >> In 1810 we have an additional female under 10. This means she was born >> between 1800 and 1810. This same female appears in the 1820 census as being >> between 10 and 15. If she was as old as 15 in 1820 then the earliest she could >> have been born would have been 1805. This means she was probably born between >> 1805 and 1810 and establishes her as a d/o Jane Drury. >> >> Can anyone add any additional data to help identify these people? >> >> I'd appreciate comments on my analysis or my conclusions. >> >> Thanks for anything you can provide. >> >> Don Drury >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in >>the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Sorry John I mistyped. Try 1-636-614-6101. ________________________________ From: John Dobricky <john.dobricky@gmail.com> To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com Sent: Mon, February 25, 2013 11:33:54 AM Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY] Zachariah Peacock Hi Don. Thanks! I tried to call the number you sent but got a recording saying it is a "non-working number." All suggestions welcome. John D. On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Donald Drury <ddrury5840@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Hi John, > > Sorry you're having trouble contacting her. She may be having problems with her > husband. He has not been well for quite a while. Her phone number is > 1-636-624-6101. > > > Don > > > > > ________________________________ > From: John Dobricky <john.dobricky@gmail.com> > To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com > Sent: Mon, February 25, 2013 11:05:22 AM > Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY] Zachariah Peacock > > Hi Don. I have not heard back from my e-mail to Ms. Obrist about the > Drury book. Do you have a phone number for her? John D. > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Donald Drury <ddrury5840@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I've been studying the census data for Zachariah Peacock (christened 1773) for >> the years 1800, 1810, and 1820. >> >> >> They list the following: >> >> Males Females >> >> 1800 1 16-26 2 under 10 >> 1 26-44 1 26-44 >> >> 1810 1 under 10 1 under 10 >> 1 26-44 2 10-16 >> 1 26-44 >> >> 1820 1 16-26 1 10-15 >> 1 over 44 1 over 44 >> >> I think these individuals can be identified as follows: >> >> 1800 1 male 16-26 Zachariah Peacock 25 years old >> 1 male 26-44 Probably either a brother or his father >> 2 females under 10 children of Zachariah and Elizabeth Joy >> 1 female 26-44 Elizabeth Joy >> >> 1810 1 male under 10 Probably John Sylvester Peacock >> 1 male 26-44 Zachariah Peacock >> 1 female under 10 d/o Zachariah and Jane Drury (Prob b. 1804) >> 2 females 10-15 Probably children of Zachariah and Elizabeth Joy >> 1 female 26-44 Probably Jane Drury >> >> 1820 1 male 16-26 Probably John Sylvester Peacock >> 1 male over 44 Zachariah Peacock >> 1 female 10-15 d/o Zachariah and Jane Drury (Prob b. 1804) >> 1 female over 45 Elizabeth Norris >> >> The 2 girls under 10 in 1800 had to be born between 1791 and 1800. I am >> assuming that the two girls 10 to 15 in 1810 are the same 2 who were under 10 >>in >> 1800. If they were as old as 15 in 1810 then the earliest they could have been >> born would have been 1795. Therefore these two were born between 1795 and > 1800. >> But since Zachariah Peacock did not marry Elizabeth Joy until 1797 we can say >> they were born between 1797 and 1800. >> >> In 1810 we have an additional female under 10. This means she was born >> between 1800 and 1810. This same female appears in the 1820 census as being >> between 10 and 15. If she was as old as 15 in 1820 then the earliest she could >> have been born would have been 1805. This means she was probably born between >> 1805 and 1810 and establishes her as a d/o Jane Drury. >> >> Can anyone add any additional data to help identify these people? >> >> I'd appreciate comments on my analysis or my conclusions. >> >> Thanks for anything you can provide. >> >> Don Drury >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in >>the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in >the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi. I just left her a voice mail message. Thanks! John D. On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Donald Drury <ddrury5840@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Sorry John I mistyped. Try 1-636-614-6101. > > > > > ________________________________ > From: John Dobricky <john.dobricky@gmail.com> > To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com > Sent: Mon, February 25, 2013 11:33:54 AM > Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY] Zachariah Peacock > > Hi Don. Thanks! I tried to call the number you sent but got a > recording saying it is a "non-working number." All suggestions > welcome. John D. > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Donald Drury <ddrury5840@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> Sorry you're having trouble contacting her. She may be having problems with > her >> husband. He has not been well for quite a while. Her phone number is >> 1-636-624-6101. >> >> >> Don >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: John Dobricky <john.dobricky@gmail.com> >> To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com >> Sent: Mon, February 25, 2013 11:05:22 AM >> Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY] Zachariah Peacock >> >> Hi Don. I have not heard back from my e-mail to Ms. Obrist about the >> Drury book. Do you have a phone number for her? John D. >> >> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Donald Drury <ddrury5840@sbcglobal.net> > wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I've been studying the census data for Zachariah Peacock (christened 1773) > for >>> the years 1800, 1810, and 1820. >>> >>> >>> They list the following: >>> >>> Males Females >>> >>> 1800 1 16-26 2 under 10 >>> 1 26-44 1 26-44 >>> >>> 1810 1 under 10 1 under 10 >>> 1 26-44 2 10-16 >>> 1 26-44 >>> >>> 1820 1 16-26 1 10-15 >>> 1 over 44 1 over 44 >>> >>> I think these individuals can be identified as follows: >>> >>> 1800 1 male 16-26 Zachariah Peacock 25 years old >>> 1 male 26-44 Probably either a brother or his father >>> 2 females under 10 children of Zachariah and Elizabeth Joy >>> 1 female 26-44 Elizabeth Joy >>> >>> 1810 1 male under 10 Probably John Sylvester Peacock >>> 1 male 26-44 Zachariah Peacock >>> 1 female under 10 d/o Zachariah and Jane Drury (Prob b. 1804) >>> 2 females 10-15 Probably children of Zachariah and Elizabeth Joy >>> 1 female 26-44 Probably Jane Drury >>> >>> 1820 1 male 16-26 Probably John Sylvester Peacock >>> 1 male over 44 Zachariah Peacock >>> 1 female 10-15 d/o Zachariah and Jane Drury (Prob b. 1804) >>> 1 female over 45 Elizabeth Norris >>> >>> The 2 girls under 10 in 1800 had to be born between 1791 and 1800. I am >>> assuming that the two girls 10 to 15 in 1810 are the same 2 who were under 10 >>>in >>> 1800. If they were as old as 15 in 1810 then the earliest they could have > been >>> born would have been 1795. Therefore these two were born between 1795 and >> 1800. >>> But since Zachariah Peacock did not marry Elizabeth Joy until 1797 we can say >>> they were born between 1797 and 1800. >>> >>> In 1810 we have an additional female under 10. This means she was born >>> between 1800 and 1810. This same female appears in the 1820 census as being >>> between 10 and 15. If she was as old as 15 in 1820 then the earliest she > could >>> have been born would have been 1805. This means she was probably born between >>> 1805 and 1810 and establishes her as a d/o Jane Drury. >>> >>> Can anyone add any additional data to help identify these people? >>> >>> I'd appreciate comments on my analysis or my conclusions. >>> >>> Thanks for anything you can provide. >>> >>> Don Drury >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in >>>the subject and the body of the message >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in >> the subject and the body of the message >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in >>the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message