Hello again, I wish I could help you more. You asked does the Catholic Church "there" where.....keep records that old. I have not done any searches on older records but the Catholic churches and many churches kept good records mainly at their churches. I do have the following record for this George Calvert, born close to 1668. Descendants of William Calvert, 3611-2-2-1, Deputy Gov. 1 William CALVERT, 3611-2-2-1, Deputy Gov. b: 1642 MD d: 1682 .. +Elizabeth STONE b: Abt. 1637 m: Abt. 1662 Father: William Stone, Govenor of MD Mother: unknown 2 Elizabeth CALVERT, #1W, (3611-2-2-1-1) b: Abt. 1663 d: 1685 ... +James NEALE, II, 215-6 b: Abt. 1643 m: 1681 d: 1727 Father: James Neale, I, Captain-215-12 Mother: Anna Gill, 215-13 2 [1] Charles CALVERT, 3611-2-2-1-2 b: Abt. 1664 ... +Barbara KIRK, #1W b: Bet. 1660 - 1679 *2nd Wife of [1] Charles CALVERT, 3611-2-2-1-2: ... +Mary HOWSON, #2W b: Bet. 1653 - 1676 m: Abt. 1695 Father: Robert Howson 2 [2] George CALVERT, I, 3611-2-2-1-2 b: 1672 ... +Elizabeth DOYNE, #1W b: Abt. 1672 m: 1690 *2nd Wife of [2] George CALVERT, I, 3611-2-2-1-2: ... +Anne NOTLEY, #2W b: Abt. 1672 m: 1692 Let me know if any of this helps. Thanks Dottie Dottie (Porter) Himes Lewisport, KY 42351 djhimes@bellsouth.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "DEL HIESTAND" <devanhi@yahoo.com> To: <mdstmary@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 4:33 PM Subject: [MDSTMARY] George Calvert 1668-1700 > Hello Dottie! > Thanks for your response! It is good to meet another cousin and fellow > researcher! I am hoping that a hidden church record will provide the > answer as to the parentage of George Calvert 1668. Does the Catholic > church there keep records that old? Who would I contact to look? Other > than the Calveret DNA project, I hope this might be an avenue to an sure > answer! > Please keep in touch! > Sincerely, > Delbert Calvert Hiestand > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >