This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: sdono7103 Surnames: Gatton - Canter Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.usa.states.maryland.counties.stmarys/2674.1.1.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Dear Marianne, We seem to have the same great grandparents. I would like to be in touch with you to exchange information. I haven't worked on the Family Tree for awhile, but I would like to get back to it. My grandmother was Carrie (Gatton) Adams. Thanks, Susan Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
Does anyone know who this couple is: John R. Clarke m. Lucinda Bolen 14 April 1814 in Harrison Co, KY?? Trying to figure out if they are part of the MD to KY migration and who the parents are. Thanks! Shirley **************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out! (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001)
Can anyone point me in the direction of John Clarke's will? He was married to Dorothy Cissell. The family lived in Ridge where my great grandmother was born and grew up. I continue to research this family and the family story that John Clarke was related to the Lee Family through Alice Lee Clarke (Phillip Lee's Line) continues to be a puzzle to prove. I know that there marriage date was October 16, 1813 but don't know there ages? Thanks....Therese **************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000002)
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: lbland46 Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.usa.states.maryland.counties.stmarys/700.723.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Thanks! Obviously not the right one! We are stumped on Elijah, trying to find his daddy - He was born in Ky in 1807 then moved to Maries Co Mo. On census it says his father was born in Pa and his mother in Va. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: sp1ke Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.usa.states.maryland.counties.stmarys/700.723.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: My Stephen Jones son, Elijah, was still living in Carter County, Kentucky in the 1860 census at the age of 86. I don't show Stephen having a son named Russell and this Elijah did not have a daughter named Gabriella. I don't show a Gabriella Jones in my file and while I have 5 Russell Jones the oldest one was born in 1905. I do show that Stephen's son Zachariah had a son named Elijah and he died in St. Louis in 1863. Larry Jones Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
Here is a link to a blank family group sheet. If for some reason the link doesn't open, go to Ancestry.com and search for Family Group Sheet and download it to your PC. _http://c.ancestry.com/pdf/trees/charts/famgrec.pdf_ (http://c.ancestry.com/pdf/trees/charts/famgrec.pdf) Lynn **************New MapQuest Local shows what's happening at your destination. Dining, Movies, Events, News & more. Try it out! (http://local.mapquest.com/?ncid=emlcntnew00000001)
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: lbland46 Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.usa.states.maryland.counties.stmarys/700.723.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I'm really hoping your Stephen is the father of my ELijah, who was born in Ky, but ended up in Maries county, Mo. Dates are somewhat right, but I keep showing a brother named Russell that is not on the list. Elijah had a daughter named Gabriella, and sometimes family names repeat. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
Is there a "standard" Family Group Sheet? Does someone have a sample, or can anyone point me to a sample? Thanks. Rich
QUADE ALBERT JERRY 28 SEP 1944 03 JUN 2002 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE BENJAMIN F SR 06 JAN 1937 04 APR 1995 HOLY FACE QUADE CALVIN EDWIN 31 MAY 1934 14 JUL 2005 SACRED HEART CATHOLIC QUADE CHARLES TRUMAN 15 JUL 1920 16 SEP 2006 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE DAVID M 02 DEC 1951 24 AUG 2001 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE GEORGE B SR 24 APR 1912 27 MAR 2002 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE HARRY MONROE 05 JUN 1918 30 DEC 1998 SACRED HEART CATHOLIC QUADE HELEN M 1918 1998 ST JOSEPHS CATHOLIC NEW QUADE HELEN M 30 MAR 1912 23 MAR 2000 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE JAMES HAROLD 25 MAR 1943 18 MAY 2004 QUEEN OF PEACE QUADE JOHN W 24 JUN 1917 25 MAY 2003 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE JOSEPH F II 08 DEC 1974 06 AUG 1994 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE JOSEPH LEONARD SR 14 DEC 1920 02 APR 2007 SACRED HEART CATHOLIC QUADE LEO ANDREW JR 31 MAY 1943 25 JUN 2002 QUEEN OF PEACE QUADE MARGARET C LATHROUM HALL 14 AUG 1934 01 NOV 1996 ST JOHN FRANCIS REGIS QUADE MARTHA LEE 09 NOV 1943 19 MAY 2006 ST JOSEPHS CATHOLIC NEW QUADE MARY ELIZABETH RUSSELL 26 FEB 1921 10 DEC 2005 SACRED HEART CATHOLIC QUADE P RHODIE SR 17 SEP 1939 20 MAR 2002 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE RACHEL A 21 DEC 1936 06 FEB 2002 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE RACHEL LEILA APR 1996 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE RICHARD EDWARD 21 NOV 1930 06 NOV 2002 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE ROBERT L JR 08 JAN 1971 25 APR 2001 CHARLES MEMORIAL GARDENS QUADE RUTH ROSETTA THARPE 06 OCT 1948 21 MAR 2006 FIRST FRIENDSHIP UMC -----Original Message----- From: mdstmary-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:mdstmary-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Bill Dillon Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 1:08 PM To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com; quaid@rootsweb.com Subject: [MDSTMARY] QUADEs in St Mary's county My deceased father-in-law, Charles William QUADE, had relatives from St. Mary's county. I am just starting to do a little research into his side of the family. What cemetery(ies) would his relatives be buried in down there? His mother was Vera Rose (or Rose Vera) QUADE (1901-1969) and her father was Charles Francis QUADE (1860-1921). Bill ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
I CAN SEND U A LIST OF QUADE BURIALS -----Original Message----- From: mdstmary-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:mdstmary-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Bill Dillon Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 1:08 PM To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com; quaid@rootsweb.com Subject: [MDSTMARY] QUADEs in St Mary's county My deceased father-in-law, Charles William QUADE, had relatives from St. Mary's county. I am just starting to do a little research into his side of the family. What cemetery(ies) would his relatives be buried in down there? His mother was Vera Rose (or Rose Vera) QUADE (1901-1969) and her father was Charles Francis QUADE (1860-1921). Bill ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
"DOLLARHIDE'S GENEALOGY RULES," by William Dollarhide Bill Dollarhide has prepared the following 45 amusing pointers for genealogy researchers. While each aphorism is intended to produce a chuckle or two, each contains an important element of genealogical truth as well. Consider #17: "Finding the place where a person lived may lead to finding that person's arrest record." The point of #17 is that researchers must keep an open mind. No one knows what is around the next bend in one's ancestral road. We will refer to these "Rules" from time to time in later issues of "Genealogy Pointers." For now, enjoy them and take them to heart. 1. Treat the brothers and sisters of your ancestor as equals, even if some of them were in jail. 2. Death certificates are rarely filled in by the person who died. 3. When visiting a funeral home, wear old clothes, no make-up, and look like you have about a week to live. The funeral director will give you anything you ask for if he thinks you may be a customer soon. 4. The cemetery where your ancestor was buried does not have perpetual care, has no office, is accessible only by a muddy road, has snakes, tall grass, and lots of bugs--and many of the old gravestones are in broken pieces, stacked in a corner under a pile of dirt. 5. A Social Security form SS-5 is better than a birth certificate because few people had anything to do with the information on their own birth certificate. 6. The application for a death certificate you want insists that you provide the maiden name of the deceased's mother, which is exactly what you don't know and is the reason you are trying to get the death certificate in the first place. 7. If you call Social Security and ask where to write for a birth certificate, tell them it is for yourself. They won't help you if you say you want one for your great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather who died in 1642. 8. When you contact your home state's vital statistics office and ask if they are "online" and they respond, "on what?" you may have a problem. 9. An 1850 census record showing all 12 children in a family proves only that your ancestors did not believe in birth control. 10. Work from the known to the unknown. In other words, just because your name is Washington doesn't mean you are related to George. 11. With any luck, some of the people in your family could read and write--and may have left something written about themselves. 12. It ain't history until it's written down. (See #19.) 13. A genealogist needs to be a detective. Just gimme da facts, Ma'am. 14. Always interview brothers and sisters together in the same room. Since they can't agree on anything about the family tree, it makes for great fun to see who throws the first punch. 15. The genealogy book you just found out about went out of print last week. 16. A good genealogical event is learning that your parents really were married. 17. Finding the place where a person lived may lead to finding that person's arrest record. 18. It's really quite simple: first, you start with yourself, then your parents, then your grandparents. Then you QUIT--and start teaching classes in genealogy. 19. If it's not written down, it ain't history yet. (See #12.) 20. In spite of MTV, computer games, or skate boards, there is always a chance that your grandchildren will learn how to read someday. 21. "To understand the living, you have to commune with the dead, but don't commune with the dead so long that you forget that you are living!" (From "Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil" by John Berendt.) 22. It is a known fact that St. Peter checks all your Family Group Sheets for accuracy before you are allowed to enter the Pearly Gates. 23. Locating the county where your ancestor lived is the first step in finding records about the time he was hauled into court for shooting his neighbor's dog, threatening the census taker with a shotgun, or making illegal corn whiskey behind the barn. 24. A cousin, once removed, may not return. 25. When going to another town for genealogical research, you will always find information on the ancestor for whom you brought no notes. 26. When in a courthouse miles from home, you will always find the breakthrough court record at 4:55pm on Friday afternoon. 27. Research in one county that leads you to information in another county will only be revealed on the last day of your vacation. 28. The tombstone you want to find is always located in the extreme opposite corner of the cemetery from where you started your search. 29. The page on the census where your ancestor's town was enumerated has no page number. 30. That cemetery in Missouri where your great-grandparents were buried is now called Interstate 70. 31. The 1892 newspaper article describing your ancestor as a child winning the grade school spelling bee will misspell her name. 32. Your ancestor will be featured in the county history because he was the first prisoner in the new jail. 33. Your ancestor moved frequently and sold all of his property to his children before he died to avoid probate. 34. The query you found in an old magazine was placed by an unknown cousin--who died two years ago. 35. The courthouse containing the information crucial to your research is always closed for renovation on the day you arrive. 36. The roll of microfilm you need for county research is the only roll in the drawer that was sent out for repair earlier that day. 37. The post office shown on the census page where your ancestors are listed is for a town that does not appear on any known map ever published. 38. The oldest living person in the county has never heard of your ancestor, who lived there years ago. 39. Genealogy is the examination of the maximum amount of data in the maximum amount of time for a minimum result. 40. If you find a query in an old periodical giving two related names for which you are searching, it will be a query that you placed yourself four years ago and forgot about. 41. You always receive more e-mail about your ancestors the day before you are scheduled to go on vacation. 42. If you took Family Group Sheets to the last wedding you attended, you probably are an addicted genealogist. 43. If you can remember your ancestors' marriage dates but not your own, you probably are an addicted genealogist. 44. Genealogy is an addiction with no cure and for which no 12-step program is available. 45. I'm crazy about genealogy, but not necessarily yours.
My deceased father-in-law, Charles William QUADE, had relatives from St. Mary's county. I am just starting to do a little research into his side of the family. What cemetery(ies) would his relatives be buried in down there? His mother was Vera Rose (or Rose Vera) QUADE (1901-1969) and her father was Charles Francis QUADE (1860-1921). Bill
I was wondering if you have seen any research on the Burch's in Kentucky. I am helping my friend research them His ancestor was BEE Birch from Henry county Kentucky. We know nothing of his family. Any help is welcomed. Thank you --- On Wed, 10/1/08, Sarah Cannon <scannon@gt.rr.com> wrote: From: Sarah Cannon <scannon@gt.rr.com> Subject: [MDSTMARY] BURCH BOOKS by SMALLWOOD To: burch@rootsweb.com, MDSTMARY-L@rootsweb.com Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 10:18 AM Just to let interested parties know - while I was searching for books - BIRCH, BURCH FAMILY IN GREAT BRITAIN & AMERICA, Vol. I & 11, by Marilu Burch SMALLWOOD, I learned of Georgia's Ancestors, a company that sells re-prints of the books. Web site - http://www.georgiagenealogy.net/ Plus, there are other re-prints by Mrs. Smallwood. When I ordered these books, the gentleman told me that these books had been indexed, which is a blessing in itself, because the original books that Mrs. Smallwood had, were not indexed. I have just about worn out my original books on this Birch/Burch family, so I was in need of replacement, as to be able to retire my original books to prevent further deterioration. Sallie ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: ke3qz Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.usa.states.maryland.counties.stmarys/4342.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Did you ever get your photo? I live within 2 miles of the church. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: klafamily Surnames: Lomax Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.usa.states.maryland.counties.stmarys/4391/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I am looking for the parents of James Madison Lomax. He was born around 1801 or 1802. As an adult he moved to Talbot County, Maryland. He may have come from St, Marys, Charles, Baltimore Counties, or even Virginia. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: ddhamm Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/localities.northam.usa.states.maryland.counties.stmarys/1141.1221.1256/mb.ashx Message Board Post: NOTICE, the McCarty Family Genealogy website referred to above has moved to: http://www.geocities.com/ddhamm/McCarty/ DeeDee Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.
Thanks, David. For your background on these two sources, it is always helpful to know the inside scoop. I tended to trust the science or trained historian vs. the story "handed down", but feel sure all of these have some validity, it's just hard to tell which one! Does the state have a more recent survey that would include some of these newer findings? Do you know anything about one of the sites listed as Abell's Wharf and where it was and how it came to be known that? David Roberts <droberts@olg.com> wrote: Kat & the List: Foreman is the great archaeologist of the 1930s. He did much of the early work at St. Mary's City. Although much of his work is now dated & replaced by the post 1970s work done by the archaeologists at Historic St. Mary's City, Foreman was the first serious archaeologist to study St. Mary's. Much of his work was done before more modern scientific techniques became available. He is the "foundation" upon which more modern research is built. A lot of his stuff is wrong by 2008 eyes, but our 2008 stuff will be wrong in 2068, when that generation studies & re-studies the evidence. That's important to remember. History CHANGES and SO DOES genealogy. Remember we ALL descended, at one time, from one of those 3 brothers .... one who went NORTH {guess that's me !}, one who went SOUTH {guess that's you people !} and one who went WEST {the Kentucky folks ? :o) } The Inventory {both editions} was a book I worked on when I was member & some-time chairman of the St. Mary's County Committee, Maryland Historical Trust. A lot of work went into that book ... and a lot of grief, too. When that house built in 1636 was shown to have been built ca. 1760, you know what hit the fan ! Law suits were threatened; but none were ever filed. I'm sure a 2008 edition of that Inventory would show changes in research, too. A few places have been shown to be actually OLDER than previously claimed. The best example is St. Francis Xavier R. C. Church at Newtown Neck. It was shown by dendrochronology to be about 30/35 years OLDER than previously thought. Some of these "tourist" claims are pure bonus &/or sloppy history. The"Old Jail" in Leonardtown was NOT built in 1858. That Jail was torn down ca. 1875/1876. The demolition of the 1858 Jail is reported in the "St. Mary's Beacon" & so was the construction of the present Jail in the mid-1870s. The "tourist" claimed date of 1858 was accepted by the Underground Railroad national commission & the mid-1870s Jail is on the Underground Railroad Trail. You can go see where pre-Civil War runaways were kept in a mid-1870s Jail. Well, maybe .............. I guess they had a "time machine" ? Anyway, both of the sources Kat mentioned are worth looking at. David ----- Original Message ----- From: "K Woodring" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 12:05 PM Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY] Maryland Historical Trust + St. Richard's Manor > List- > > I have found two books that have catalogued MD homes and historic sites with brief descriptions and locations. I would guess they would be somewhat of an authority as opposed to genealogical sources? There are pictures, sometimes of interior features. > > Foreman, H. Chandlee. Early Manor Plantation Houses of Maryland. Bodine & Associates, Inc. Baltimore. 1934, 1982. ( I don't have the page with St. Richard's copied) > > Inventory of Historic Sites in Calvert County Charles County and St. Mary's County. Maryland Historical Trust. Annapolis, Maryland. 1973, 1980. > > p114. > St. Richards (pictured) is listed as early 18th century due to brick laid in "Flemish bond...The north facade is five bays in length with the existing windows being a slight alteration of the originals both in height and width, the south facade is three bays wide. One of the most distinctive exterior features of the house is the glazed cheering of the end elevations... > > > mur10195@aol.com wrote: > Davd, thank you again!? I was able to access information on St. Richard's that I'd not been able to access previously.? This was very helpful. > Mur > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Roberts > To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com > Sent: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 3:48 am > Subject: [MDSTMARY] Maryland Historical Trust + St. Richard's Manor > > > > I attempted to answer a person on this list, but my e-mail was blocked & > returned by his/her security. > I'm taking the liberty of posting part of his/her e-mail to the list. I had > asked if he/she could do it; since I can't ask directly, I'll just post because > I think this answer is VERY important. It should help any of us on the list > searching for historical sites in Maryland - statewide, not just in St. Mary's. > > > > The nomination reports are available on the MD Historical Trust web site - > > > > http://www.marylandhistoricaltrust.net/mihp-search.html > > > Here is what this person had to say about St. Richard's. It seems to indicate > that St. Richard's MIGHT BE a bit older than the "early 18th century" date > listed in the Maryland Historical Trust's book. "Early 18th century" is a > somewhat vague time period ... but all dating of these early buildings are > really vague UNLESS you get into this question posed by the writer >>> > especially any dendrochronology studies? <<<<<< > > Any comments ?? > Thanks ! > David > > > > > From what I've read of this report, St. Richard's Manor was dated late > > 1600's through about the first quarter of the 1700's. The date range given > > in the report varies somewhat in different parts of the report, but it > reads to me like it was based primarily on the style of the architecture. > > > I'm curious, do you know if anyone has done any recent archaeological > > investigation into any of the old manor houses in St. Mary's, especially > any dendrochronology studies? > > < , |/ > < ' /| > > Kat Woodring > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message < , |/ < ' /| Kat Woodring
Kat & the List: Foreman is the great archaeologist of the 1930s. He did much of the early work at St. Mary's City. Although much of his work is now dated & replaced by the post 1970s work done by the archaeologists at Historic St. Mary's City, Foreman was the first serious archaeologist to study St. Mary's. Much of his work was done before more modern scientific techniques became available. He is the "foundation" upon which more modern research is built. A lot of his stuff is wrong by 2008 eyes, but our 2008 stuff will be wrong in 2068, when that generation studies & re-studies the evidence. That's important to remember. History CHANGES and SO DOES genealogy. Remember we ALL descended, at one time, from one of those 3 brothers .... one who went NORTH {guess that's me !}, one who went SOUTH {guess that's you people !} and one who went WEST {the Kentucky folks ? :o) } The Inventory {both editions} was a book I worked on when I was member & some-time chairman of the St. Mary's County Committee, Maryland Historical Trust. A lot of work went into that book ... and a lot of grief, too. When that house built in 1636 was shown to have been built ca. 1760, you know what hit the fan ! Law suits were threatened; but none were ever filed. I'm sure a 2008 edition of that Inventory would show changes in research, too. A few places have been shown to be actually OLDER than previously claimed. The best example is St. Francis Xavier R. C. Church at Newtown Neck. It was shown by dendrochronology to be about 30/35 years OLDER than previously thought. Some of these "tourist" claims are pure bonus &/or sloppy history. The"Old Jail" in Leonardtown was NOT built in 1858. That Jail was torn down ca. 1875/1876. The demolition of the 1858 Jail is reported in the "St. Mary's Beacon" & so was the construction of the present Jail in the mid-1870s. The "tourist" claimed date of 1858 was accepted by the Underground Railroad national commission & the mid-1870s Jail is on the Underground Railroad Trail. You can go see where pre-Civil War runaways were kept in a mid-1870s Jail. Well, maybe .............. I guess they had a "time machine" ? Anyway, both of the sources Kat mentioned are worth looking at. David ----- Original Message ----- From: "K Woodring" <katwoodring@yahoo.com> To: <mdstmary@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 12:05 PM Subject: Re: [MDSTMARY] Maryland Historical Trust + St. Richard's Manor > List- > > I have found two books that have catalogued MD homes and historic sites with brief descriptions and locations. I would guess they would be somewhat of an authority as opposed to genealogical sources? There are pictures, sometimes of interior features. > > Foreman, H. Chandlee. Early Manor Plantation Houses of Maryland. Bodine & Associates, Inc. Baltimore. 1934, 1982. ( I don't have the page with St. Richard's copied) > > Inventory of Historic Sites in Calvert County Charles County and St. Mary's County. Maryland Historical Trust. Annapolis, Maryland. 1973, 1980. > > p114. > St. Richards (pictured) is listed as early 18th century due to brick laid in "Flemish bond...The north facade is five bays in length with the existing windows being a slight alteration of the originals both in height and width, the south facade is three bays wide. One of the most distinctive exterior features of the house is the glazed cheering of the end elevations... > > > mur10195@aol.com wrote: > Davd, thank you again!? I was able to access information on St. Richard's that I'd not been able to access previously.? This was very helpful. > Mur > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Roberts > To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com > Sent: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 3:48 am > Subject: [MDSTMARY] Maryland Historical Trust + St. Richard's Manor > > > > I attempted to answer a person on this list, but my e-mail was blocked & > returned by his/her security. > I'm taking the liberty of posting part of his/her e-mail to the list. I had > asked if he/she could do it; since I can't ask directly, I'll just post because > I think this answer is VERY important. It should help any of us on the list > searching for historical sites in Maryland - statewide, not just in St. Mary's. > > > > The nomination reports are available on the MD Historical Trust web site - > > > > http://www.marylandhistoricaltrust.net/mihp-search.html > > > Here is what this person had to say about St. Richard's. It seems to indicate > that St. Richard's MIGHT BE a bit older than the "early 18th century" date > listed in the Maryland Historical Trust's book. "Early 18th century" is a > somewhat vague time period ... but all dating of these early buildings are > really vague UNLESS you get into this question posed by the writer >>> > especially any dendrochronology studies? <<<<<< > > Any comments ?? > Thanks ! > David > > > > > From what I've read of this report, St. Richard's Manor was dated late > > 1600's through about the first quarter of the 1700's. The date range given > > in the report varies somewhat in different parts of the report, but it > reads to me like it was based primarily on the style of the architecture. > > > I'm curious, do you know if anyone has done any recent archaeological > > investigation into any of the old manor houses in St. Mary's, especially > any dendrochronology studies? > > < , |/ > < ' /| > > Kat Woodring >
Just to let interested parties know - while I was searching for books - BIRCH, BURCH FAMILY IN GREAT BRITAIN & AMERICA, Vol. I & 11, by Marilu Burch SMALLWOOD, I learned of Georgia's Ancestors, a company that sells re-prints of the books. Web site - http://www.georgiagenealogy.net/ Plus, there are other re-prints by Mrs. Smallwood. When I ordered these books, the gentleman told me that these books had been indexed, which is a blessing in itself, because the original books that Mrs. Smallwood had, were not indexed. I have just about worn out my original books on this Birch/Burch family, so I was in need of replacement, as to be able to retire my original books to prevent further deterioration. Sallie
List- I have found two books that have catalogued MD homes and historic sites with brief descriptions and locations. I would guess they would be somewhat of an authority as opposed to genealogical sources? There are pictures, sometimes of interior features. Foreman, H. Chandlee. Early Manor Plantation Houses of Maryland. Bodine & Associates, Inc. Baltimore. 1934, 1982. ( I don't have the page with St. Richard's copied) Inventory of Historic Sites in Calvert County Charles County and St. Mary's County. Maryland Historical Trust. Annapolis, Maryland. 1973, 1980. p114. St. Richards (pictured) is listed as early 18th century due to brick laid in "Flemish bond...The north facade is five bays in length with the existing windows being a slight alteration of the originals both in height and width, the south facade is three bays wide. One of the most distinctive exterior features of the house is the glazed cheering of the end elevations... mur10195@aol.com wrote: Davd, thank you again!? I was able to access information on St. Richard's that I'd not been able to access previously.? This was very helpful. Mur -----Original Message----- From: David Roberts To: mdstmary@rootsweb.com Sent: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 3:48 am Subject: [MDSTMARY] Maryland Historical Trust + St. Richard's Manor I attempted to answer a person on this list, but my e-mail was blocked & returned by his/her security. I'm taking the liberty of posting part of his/her e-mail to the list. I had asked if he/she could do it; since I can't ask directly, I'll just post because I think this answer is VERY important. It should help any of us on the list searching for historical sites in Maryland - statewide, not just in St. Mary's. > The nomination reports are available on the MD Historical Trust web site - > > http://www.marylandhistoricaltrust.net/mihp-search.html Here is what this person had to say about St. Richard's. It seems to indicate that St. Richard's MIGHT BE a bit older than the "early 18th century" date listed in the Maryland Historical Trust's book. "Early 18th century" is a somewhat vague time period ... but all dating of these early buildings are really vague UNLESS you get into this question posed by the writer >>> especially any dendrochronology studies? <<<<<< Any comments ?? Thanks ! David > > From what I've read of this report, St. Richard's Manor was dated late > 1600's through about the first quarter of the 1700's. The date range given > in the report varies somewhat in different parts of the report, but it reads to me like it was based primarily on the style of the architecture. > I'm curious, do you know if anyone has done any recent archaeological > investigation into any of the old manor houses in St. Mary's, especially any dendrochronology studies? ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MDSTMARY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message < , |/ < ' /| Kat Woodring