Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [MDFR] naturalization
    2. Mr G Crooks 2nd
    3. Actually Art his naturalization would have come much earlier and her is why. Until 1776 we were subjects of the British Crown. The Crown was interested in populating the colonies so the entrance rules were quite liberal for its time. Upon arrival in a port here the Ship's captain and/or land agents were required to submit a list of it passengers and the foreign born were require to sign a pledge of allegiance to the Crown. This was then submitted to the Royal Governor, but normally handled by the lieutenant Governor who then signed the petition and only then were the foreign born allowed off the ship. This act admited them to citzenship Going back to your George Kraft, if he came from Chester, Pa., he mostb probably arrived at either the port of Philadelphia and/or New Casrle, Delaware. Many arrived down the river at New castle because there was no Port of Philadelphia head tax I have a copy on the arrivals book on German and other foreign immigrants and I see a Gottfried Krafft arrived in Sept 1731 at Philadelphia, is he yours ?? Gordon Crooks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Art Miller" <[email protected]> To: "ZZ-Frederick Co., Md." <[email protected]>; "ZZ-Washington Co., Md." <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 5:59 PM Subject: [MDFR] naturalization > Looking for someone that has copy of "Colonial Maryland Naturalizations" > who is willing to check for a record for George Craft/Kraft. He came to > Md. in 1754 from Chester Co., Pa. and I suspect his naturalization would > have been in 1760's. > Thanks for any help. > Art Miller, Louisville > Visit www.MidMdRoots.com > for Old Court Records, Tombstone > Inscriptions, Old Newspaper items, etc > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    10/09/2012 01:48:20