That's all right, Shirley. We all get sick of that! I suppose I do strange "sourcing". I put the correspondence on the subject in a person's notes. If I pull it off of the net where "everyone" seems to have it and no one gives a source, neither do I. If I don't justify it, you better take it with a grain of salt. ----- Original Message ----- From: "SHIRLEY MOLLER" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 6:00 PM Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 > List, > I've had a bad day today research wise, it is a drag when someone takes > your findings and makes it theirs with no mention of you any where in > sight. And I'm sorry my complaint went thru the list. It was meant for > Norma only, but stupid me I didn't check the address. > > Shirley Middleton Moller > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "SHIRLEY MOLLER" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:47 PM > Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 > > >>I knew that the widow of Stephen Sr didn't marry Samuel Berry. >> And I know that she had more children than Stephen Jr. >> >> Everything out on this family is pretty much made up by others. Ann the >> wife of Stephen Sr could be a Cole, due to the will of Giles Cole will, >> but >> then again she may not be. She cannot have two maiden names, as it looks >> like Cawood people want to attach to her. When I cannot prove that she is >> "definitely" a Cole Terrett, I do not make her a Cole. I know that is how >> you work also. Guesses are set as an aside. >> >> I researched this family some time ago and the article Ken mentioned is >> the >> first I've heard of on this family, so I was wondering about the sources >> it >> uses. I dropped Ken a line requesting a copy of the article. We will see >> if he comes thru. >> But today I guess it is really bothering me that others do not do any >> research, but sure want what you've done. >> >> Shirley >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Norma Lundgren" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:31 PM >> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 >> >> >>> Shirley, the statement that Ann Cawood married Samuel Berry is based in >>> part on >>> an error. Ann, the widow of Stephen Cawood, married second John Wynn, and >>> third >>> James Berry. Many people give James as Samuel, but that is an error. >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "SHIRLEY MOLLER" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 8:19 PM >>> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 >>> >>> >>>> Norma and Ken, >>>> I find it interesting that right under the will of John Wedding, Sr of >>>> Charles Co., in the Calendar of Wills book, p 200 is the will of >>>> Humphrey >>>> Berry of Charles Co., and it caught my eye because Humphrey happens to >>>> have >>>> tracts called Mt. Parradise & Hull. The same tracts that are owned by >>>> Stephen Cawood, Jr. that was married to Mary Cox. And this Humphrey >>>> Berry >>>> has a son named Samuel. >>>> >>>> Ken why couldn't Ann that married Samuel Berry be the d/o Stephen >>>> Cawood, >>>> Sr >>>> and wife Ann? >>>> >>>> Shirley Middleton Moller >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Ken Wedding" <[email protected]> >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 5:39 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 >>>> >>>> >>>>> Norma, >>>>> >>>>> I agree that this Ann Cawood (if the info is accurate) is not Anne >>>>> Cawood, b. about 1702, who was the daughter of Stephen Cawood, Jr., and >>>>> Mary Cox. >>>>> >>>>> The Ann Cawood I have as wife to Samuel Berry was born about 1675. I >>>>> have no parents' names for either her or Samuel Berry. >>>>> >>>>> My source for the information is the "Robey/Robie/Roby Family >>>>> Association, Inc. Semi Annual Newsletter," Vol. 3 Issue 2 Mid May, 1999 >>>>> >>>>> The connections are that Mary Berry married John Robey IV (son of John >>>>> Robey III and Sarah Smallwood). AND Sarah Berry's 2nd husband was >>>>> Jacob Robey >>>>> >>>>> Included in that Newsletter article was this note, "Dr. Berry's >>>>> daughter was in fact named Mary as proven in the Certificate of survey >>>>> for Samuel Robey on lot #10 of Zachaiah manor, dated 31 Aug 1741. >>>>> William Hanson, Deputy Surveyor of Charles County, included the >>>>> following note on the certificate, "Lives to be put in the lease are >>>>> said Samuel Robey and wife Sarah and Berry Robey, son of John and Mary >>>>> Robey." This proves Berry Roby's parents and his birth before 31 Aug >>>>> 1741." (Charles Co., MD Unpatented Certificate #519 at the Maryland >>>>> Hall of Records in Annapolis) >>>>> >>>>> So, it seems that the Samuel Berry mentioned above was a doctor. So, >>>>> David, I would expect you can probably find some other records of this >>>>> Dr. Samuel Berry. Good luck. >>>>> >>>>> Ken Wedding >>>>> Northfield, Minnesota >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:53 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Message: 2 >>>>>> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:37:40 -0700 >>>>>> From: "Norma Lundgren" <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 168 >>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; >>>>>> reply-type=original >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think Samuel Berry married Ann Cawood, unless she was a >>>>>> different one >>>>>> than the d/o Stephen Cawood and Mary Cox. She is given in her father's >>>>>> will as >>>>>> Anne Thomas, the widow of William Atchison. In a 1737 deed issued by >>>>>> her mother, >>>>>> she is named as the wife of John Thomas. In the 1745 probate of John >>>>>> Clubb, her >>>>>> mother and brother are given as his next of kin, and wife Anna is >>>>>> named. Her >>>>>> oldest son, William Atchison, was the surety of the estate. If there >>>>>> is other >>>>>> proof that she married third, John Clubb, I don't have it. She died >>>>>> sometime in >>>>>> 1745 before Mathew Clubb is given as the "surviving" executor of his >>>>>> father. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: "Ken Wedding" <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 12:38 PM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 168 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> BERRY >>>>>>> >>>>>>> My records have a Samuel Berry, b. about 1664 in England and died >>>>>>> before 1753 in Charles County, MD >>>>>>> >>>>>>> About 1689, in Charles Co., he married Ann Cawood, who was born about >>>>>>> 1675 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In my records, they had 2 daughters >>>>>>> Mary Berry, born about 1718 >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> Sarah Berry, born about 1717, died 22 May 1777 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mary Berry married John Robey IV before 1734 in Charles Co. >>>>>>> (John Robey IV, b. 1714 in Charles Co., d. 1804 in Iredell Co., NC) >>>>>>> this couple had 9 children >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sarah Berry married John Wynn, 24 Aug. 1738 >>>>>>> (John Wynn, b. 1720) >>>>>>> This couple had 15 children >>>>>>> >>>>>>> None of this gets you closer to Judge Berry, but the Berry name was >>>>>>> present in Charles Co. Perhaps Samuel Berry and Ann Cawood had more >>>>>>> children than just the two daughters. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ken Wedding >>>>>>> Northfield, MN >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2007, at 2:20 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: "David Middleton Edelen II" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 5:34 AM >>>>>>>> Subject: [MDCHARLE] Friendship or Mt. Friendship? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> I have a couple of questions: I am David Middleton >>>>>>>>> Edelen >>>>>>>>> II and my >>>>>>>>> family were all among some of the original people in Charles and >>>>>>>>> Pr. >>>>>>>>> Georges >>>>>>>>> Counties, Md.. Upon her death in 1994 my grandmother, Mrs. David >>>>>>>>> Middleton >>>>>>>>> Edelen (maiden name: Eloise Gilmore Berry) still owned like 90 >>>>>>>>> acres >>>>>>>>> of land >>>>>>>>> in the "Berry" community along Mattawoman Creek which she always >>>>>>>>> said >>>>>>>>> had >>>>>>>>> always been known as "Friendship". My dad and Uncle both said that >>>>>>>>> at one >>>>>>>>> time it was several thousand acres, etc.. I have also heard it was >>>>>>>>> also known >>>>>>>>> as Mt. Friendship. On the other side of the creek lay my gr gr >>>>>>>>> grandfather >>>>>>>>> Alexius Llewellyn Middleton's land (back in Civil War or post CW >>>>>>>>> days). >>>>>>>>> Anyway, my grandmother always said that land had always >>>>>>>>> been in her >>>>>>>>> family. That her grandfather Judge Thomas Baker Berry owned it at >>>>>>>>> one time >>>>>>>>> and her father and his siblings were born there. But I have heard >>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>> originally that it was Edelen land. Does anyone know the history of >>>>>>>>> that land >>>>>>>>> and that area, or anything about Judge Thomas Baker Berry or their >>>>>>>>> line of >>>>>>>>> Berrys? I can't even find out who Thomas Baker Berry's parents >>>>>>>>> were. >>>>>>>>> I have >>>>>>>>> my Edelen line back to like 1500, my Middletons back to the 16 or >>>>>>>>> 1700s, but >>>>>>>>> only have my Berry line back to Judge Thomas Baker Berry, my gr gr >>>>>>>>> grandfather. I have a lot of info on him personally, his wife's >>>>>>>>> family back to >>>>>>>>> British Parliament, etc, but none on his folks. My dad met my mom >>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>> WWII and >>>>>>>>> moved to Alabama with her after the war. So I grew up in Alabama >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>> never >>>>>>>>> knew any Edelen, Middleton, or Berry cousins other than my two >>>>>>>>> Edelen >>>>>>>>> first >>>>>>>>> cousins in Silver Springs, Md.. >>>>>>>>> Any info on that Berry land or my gr gr grandfather >>>>>>>>> Judge >>>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>>> Baker Berry would be greatly appreciated. >>>>>>>>> Sincerely, >>>>>>>>> David Middleton Edelen II >>>>>>>>> Millbrook, Alabama >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>> quotes >>>> in the subject and the body of the message >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message
Hello Shirley, Don't let it get you down. Sometimes I have mentioned things, information that someone gave me and was so busy or in a hurry forgot to add who was gracius and kind enough to share it with me or went to the trouble of looking something up for me. But even if I fail to give credit where credit is due I always appreciate what someone has done for me. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Norma Lundgren" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 7:13 PM Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 > That's all right, Shirley. We all get sick of that! I suppose I do strange > "sourcing". I put the correspondence on the subject in a person's notes. > If I > pull it off of the net where "everyone" seems to have it and no one gives > a > source, neither do I. If I don't justify it, you better take it with a > grain of > salt. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "SHIRLEY MOLLER" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 6:00 PM > Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 > > >> List, >> I've had a bad day today research wise, it is a drag when someone takes >> your findings and makes it theirs with no mention of you any where in >> sight. And I'm sorry my complaint went thru the list. It was meant for >> Norma only, but stupid me I didn't check the address. >> >> Shirley Middleton Moller >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "SHIRLEY MOLLER" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:47 PM >> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 >> >> >>>I knew that the widow of Stephen Sr didn't marry Samuel Berry. >>> And I know that she had more children than Stephen Jr. >>> >>> Everything out on this family is pretty much made up by others. Ann the >>> wife of Stephen Sr could be a Cole, due to the will of Giles Cole will, >>> but >>> then again she may not be. She cannot have two maiden names, as it >>> looks >>> like Cawood people want to attach to her. When I cannot prove that she >>> is >>> "definitely" a Cole Terrett, I do not make her a Cole. I know that is >>> how >>> you work also. Guesses are set as an aside. >>> >>> I researched this family some time ago and the article Ken mentioned is >>> the >>> first I've heard of on this family, so I was wondering about the sources >>> it >>> uses. I dropped Ken a line requesting a copy of the article. We will >>> see >>> if he comes thru. >>> But today I guess it is really bothering me that others do not do any >>> research, but sure want what you've done. >>> >>> Shirley >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Norma Lundgren" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:31 PM >>> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 >>> >>> >>>> Shirley, the statement that Ann Cawood married Samuel Berry is based in >>>> part on >>>> an error. Ann, the widow of Stephen Cawood, married second John Wynn, >>>> and >>>> third >>>> James Berry. Many people give James as Samuel, but that is an error. >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "SHIRLEY MOLLER" <[email protected]> >>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 8:19 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 >>>> >>>> >>>>> Norma and Ken, >>>>> I find it interesting that right under the will of John Wedding, Sr of >>>>> Charles Co., in the Calendar of Wills book, p 200 is the will of >>>>> Humphrey >>>>> Berry of Charles Co., and it caught my eye because Humphrey happens >>>>> to >>>>> have >>>>> tracts called Mt. Parradise & Hull. The same tracts that are owned >>>>> by >>>>> Stephen Cawood, Jr. that was married to Mary Cox. And this Humphrey >>>>> Berry >>>>> has a son named Samuel. >>>>> >>>>> Ken why couldn't Ann that married Samuel Berry be the d/o Stephen >>>>> Cawood, >>>>> Sr >>>>> and wife Ann? >>>>> >>>>> Shirley Middleton Moller >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Ken Wedding" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 5:39 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 170 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Norma, >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree that this Ann Cawood (if the info is accurate) is not Anne >>>>>> Cawood, b. about 1702, who was the daughter of Stephen Cawood, Jr., >>>>>> and >>>>>> Mary Cox. >>>>>> >>>>>> The Ann Cawood I have as wife to Samuel Berry was born about 1675. I >>>>>> have no parents' names for either her or Samuel Berry. >>>>>> >>>>>> My source for the information is the "Robey/Robie/Roby Family >>>>>> Association, Inc. Semi Annual Newsletter," Vol. 3 Issue 2 Mid May, >>>>>> 1999 >>>>>> >>>>>> The connections are that Mary Berry married John Robey IV (son of >>>>>> John >>>>>> Robey III and Sarah Smallwood). AND Sarah Berry's 2nd husband was >>>>>> Jacob Robey >>>>>> >>>>>> Included in that Newsletter article was this note, "Dr. Berry's >>>>>> daughter was in fact named Mary as proven in the Certificate of >>>>>> survey >>>>>> for Samuel Robey on lot #10 of Zachaiah manor, dated 31 Aug 1741. >>>>>> William Hanson, Deputy Surveyor of Charles County, included the >>>>>> following note on the certificate, "Lives to be put in the lease are >>>>>> said Samuel Robey and wife Sarah and Berry Robey, son of John and >>>>>> Mary >>>>>> Robey." This proves Berry Roby's parents and his birth before 31 Aug >>>>>> 1741." (Charles Co., MD Unpatented Certificate #519 at the Maryland >>>>>> Hall of Records in Annapolis) >>>>>> >>>>>> So, it seems that the Samuel Berry mentioned above was a doctor. So, >>>>>> David, I would expect you can probably find some other records of >>>>>> this >>>>>> Dr. Samuel Berry. Good luck. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ken Wedding >>>>>> Northfield, Minnesota >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 16, 2007, at 9:53 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Message: 2 >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:37:40 -0700 >>>>>>> From: "Norma Lundgren" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 168 >>>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; >>>>>>> reply-type=original >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think Samuel Berry married Ann Cawood, unless she was a >>>>>>> different one >>>>>>> than the d/o Stephen Cawood and Mary Cox. She is given in her >>>>>>> father's >>>>>>> will as >>>>>>> Anne Thomas, the widow of William Atchison. In a 1737 deed issued by >>>>>>> her mother, >>>>>>> she is named as the wife of John Thomas. In the 1745 probate of John >>>>>>> Clubb, her >>>>>>> mother and brother are given as his next of kin, and wife Anna is >>>>>>> named. Her >>>>>>> oldest son, William Atchison, was the surety of the estate. If there >>>>>>> is other >>>>>>> proof that she married third, John Clubb, I don't have it. She died >>>>>>> sometime in >>>>>>> 1745 before Mathew Clubb is given as the "surviving" executor of his >>>>>>> father. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>>> From: "Ken Wedding" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 12:38 PM >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] MDCHARLE Digest, Vol 2, Issue 168 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BERRY >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My records have a Samuel Berry, b. about 1664 in England and died >>>>>>>> before 1753 in Charles County, MD >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> About 1689, in Charles Co., he married Ann Cawood, who was born >>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>> 1675 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In my records, they had 2 daughters >>>>>>>> Mary Berry, born about 1718 >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> Sarah Berry, born about 1717, died 22 May 1777 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mary Berry married John Robey IV before 1734 in Charles Co. >>>>>>>> (John Robey IV, b. 1714 in Charles Co., d. 1804 in Iredell Co., NC) >>>>>>>> this couple had 9 children >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sarah Berry married John Wynn, 24 Aug. 1738 >>>>>>>> (John Wynn, b. 1720) >>>>>>>> This couple had 15 children >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> None of this gets you closer to Judge Berry, but the Berry name was >>>>>>>> present in Charles Co. Perhaps Samuel Berry and Ann Cawood had >>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>> children than just the two daughters. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ken Wedding >>>>>>>> Northfield, MN >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 2007, at 2:20 PM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: "David Middleton Edelen II" <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> To: <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 5:34 AM >>>>>>>>> Subject: [MDCHARLE] Friendship or Mt. Friendship? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of questions: I am David Middleton >>>>>>>>>> Edelen >>>>>>>>>> II and my >>>>>>>>>> family were all among some of the original people in Charles and >>>>>>>>>> Pr. >>>>>>>>>> Georges >>>>>>>>>> Counties, Md.. Upon her death in 1994 my grandmother, Mrs. David >>>>>>>>>> Middleton >>>>>>>>>> Edelen (maiden name: Eloise Gilmore Berry) still owned like 90 >>>>>>>>>> acres >>>>>>>>>> of land >>>>>>>>>> in the "Berry" community along Mattawoman Creek which she always >>>>>>>>>> said >>>>>>>>>> had >>>>>>>>>> always been known as "Friendship". My dad and Uncle both said >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> at one >>>>>>>>>> time it was several thousand acres, etc.. I have also heard it >>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>> also known >>>>>>>>>> as Mt. Friendship. On the other side of the creek lay my gr gr >>>>>>>>>> grandfather >>>>>>>>>> Alexius Llewellyn Middleton's land (back in Civil War or post CW >>>>>>>>>> days). >>>>>>>>>> Anyway, my grandmother always said that land had >>>>>>>>>> always >>>>>>>>>> been in her >>>>>>>>>> family. That her grandfather Judge Thomas Baker Berry owned it >>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>> one time >>>>>>>>>> and her father and his siblings were born there. But I have >>>>>>>>>> heard >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> originally that it was Edelen land. Does anyone know the history >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> that land >>>>>>>>>> and that area, or anything about Judge Thomas Baker Berry or >>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>> line of >>>>>>>>>> Berrys? I can't even find out who Thomas Baker Berry's parents >>>>>>>>>> were. >>>>>>>>>> I have >>>>>>>>>> my Edelen line back to like 1500, my Middletons back to the 16 or >>>>>>>>>> 1700s, but >>>>>>>>>> only have my Berry line back to Judge Thomas Baker Berry, my gr >>>>>>>>>> gr >>>>>>>>>> grandfather. I have a lot of info on him personally, his wife's >>>>>>>>>> family back to >>>>>>>>>> British Parliament, etc, but none on his folks. My dad met my >>>>>>>>>> mom >>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>> WWII and >>>>>>>>>> moved to Alabama with her after the war. So I grew up in Alabama >>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> never >>>>>>>>>> knew any Edelen, Middleton, or Berry cousins other than my two >>>>>>>>>> Edelen >>>>>>>>>> first >>>>>>>>>> cousins in Silver Springs, Md.. >>>>>>>>>> Any info on that Berry land or my gr gr grandfather >>>>>>>>>> Judge >>>>>>>>>> Thomas >>>>>>>>>> Baker Berry would be greatly appreciated. >>>>>>>>>> Sincerely, >>>>>>>>>> David Middleton Edelen II >>>>>>>>>> Millbrook, Alabama >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>>>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>>>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>>> quotes >>>>> in the subject and the body of the message >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message