Thank you to Mary Jo Pundt for sending information and records on the lineage of the LETTON family who were in Frederick County, MD. JOHANNA LETTON is the wife of LEONARD HALL. Still trying to connect him with ANNE HALL in Loughborough, Leicestershire, England that married HENRY HARDYE in 1638. This HENRY HARDYE, is the son of GEORGE HARDY, and an heir of HENRY HARDY in his will in 1714 in Charles County. Thank you MARY JO, Marianne Dillow

I have info on Walter Story and Briscoe's if ou need it. MaryJo -------------- Original message -------------- From: marianne dillow <[email protected]> > I made a typo error in my previous posting on the Will of HENRY HARDY of Charles > County. It should have read 21 Dec 1705....20 Sep 1714 : > "To wife ANN, to Kinsman HENRY, son of GEORGE HARDY, and heirs, of > Loughbrough, Lessester Cointy (Leicestershire County), residue of personalty and > land afsd." > Ex : PHILIP BRISCOE, and his son JOHN BRISCOE > Overseer : WALTER STORY > > This is the information I received from Leicestershire, England yesterday : > > (1) HENRY HARDYE married ANNE HALL Family 2 Feb 1638 Loughborough, Leicester, > England.... no church mentioned. > > (2) HENRY HARDYE Christening : 5 Nov 1687 All Saints, Loughborough, > Leicester, England. > Father: GEORGE HARDEY Family. > > I wanted to share this with the list. I apologize for my typo error in my > previous posting. It probably was confusing. > Marianne Dillow > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message

For Lorie: Short answer: NO. I have not found proof of forebears of Wiliam Hungerford (born 1634) who married Anne Smoot. However, that being said, there has to have been a William Hungerford, senior, as William Hungerford came into Maryland 1646 and on 7 April 1648 he demanded 100 acres for transporting himself in 1646 and again another 100 acres for transporting himself in 1647. On 2 January 1646/47 he swore fealty to the Proprietary (MD Archives iii 174) and 29 Feb. 1647/8 William Hungerford and others petitioned for themselves and "severall soldiers against the estate of Mrs. Margaret Brent for their wages." 9MD Archives i, 226). There are other mentions of him in this time frame. Also may have removed to Virginia as a result of Ingles Rebellion and come back into MD in 1647 and thus gained another right of entry. The point of the above being that this could not be the William Hungerford born 1634 as he would only be 12-14 yrs. old in 1646/47/48. Some references refer to a William H., wife Ann, father of William 1634, but I have found no good proof. I also cannot find any William on a ship coming into Maryland. As the Hungerfords were so closely allied to the Smoot family, and the Smoots came from Charles City, VA, my thought is perhaps the Hungerford immigrant came into VA also. Again, no proof. In England, there were five branches of the Hungerford family, all originating from Farleigh-Hungerford Castle. You might take a look at the web page of Julie Neel. Roots Web World Connect Project: Neel, Black Landers, Cantrell. Julie Neel E-mail [email protected] I corresponded with her once about a year ago and she said she would send me her proofs and I have not heard back. She has William of Maryland descending from the Anthony Hungerford family of Down Ampney, England. This made sense and corresponded to what I had decided (with no proof at all) just from the book published in England on the Milward-Oliver family. (50 copies, and I have one). Anyway, it is a starting point. I would love to see someone pursue this. Who is your Hungerford ancestor? I wish I could be of more help but this is where I am with it. Anne Johnson

Anne Johnson [[email protected]] wrote: > I have not found proof of forebears of William Hungerford >(born 1634) who married Anne Smoot. However, that being said, there has to >have been a William Hungerford, senior, as William Hungerford came into >Maryland 1646 and on 7 April 1648 he demanded 100 acres for transporting >himself in 1646 and again another 100 acres for transporting himself in >1647. On 2 January 1646/47 he swore fealty to the Proprietary (MD Archives >iii 174) and 29 Feb. 1647/8 William Hungerford and others petitioned for >themselves and "severall soldiers against the estate of Mrs. Margaret Brent >for their wages." 9MD Archives i, 226). There are other mentions of him in >this time frame. Also may have removed to Virginia as a result of Ingles >Rebellion and come back into MD in 1647 and thus gained another right of >entry. >The point of the above being that this could not be the William Hungerford >born 1634 as he would only be 12-14 yrs. old in 1646/47/48. ============== Hi Anne, I believe that all the first records you list apply to William HUNGERFORD who married Anne SMOOT. The question is not how could these apply to a person 12-14 years old, but what evidence is there that William HUNGERFORD was born in 1634? I am not aware of any. If you do know of such a record, please share it. I believe that the William who married Anne SMOOT was probably born in the mid 1620s. As to references to the parents of William HUNGERFORD who married Anne SMOOT being a William HUNGERFORD and Ann, I believe this is a confusing of records and trying to make a William and Ann the parents of William who married Anne SMOOT (in other words, making him and his wife his own parents) because of a belief in a 1634 birth. I don't see that there has been any DNA testing done on HUNGERFORD. At least, there is only one person listed at http://www.familytreedna.com/ Maybe we should locate HUNGERFORD descendants of William, as well as some of those English lines, and see if there is a common ancestor. Rick Saunders http://home.netcom.com/~fzsaund/hungerford.html -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.18/734 - Release Date: 3/26/2007 2:31 PM

Earlier I posted the Will on HENRY HARDY in 1714 in Charles County naming kinsman HENRY, son of GEORGE HARDY of Loughborough, Leicestershire County, England . In the information I received yesterday it mentioned HENRY HARDYE married ANNE HALL 2 Feb 1638 in Loughborough and another record naming HENRY Christened 5 Nov 1687 , All Saints, Loughborugh, Leicester, England it also named his father as GEORGE HARDY. I have a HARDY cousin that descends from SOLOMON HARDY born 26 Jun 1785 in Prince Georges County. He moved to Bedford County, Va. This SOLOMON married ELIZABETH HALL born Abt 1754 in Frederick County, MD. ELIZABETH HALL was the daughter of LEONARD HALL born Abt 1730 in MD. He married JOHANNA LYTTON (LITTON, LYTTON) from MD. I am wondering about HENRY HARDYE marrying ANNE HALL in Loughborough and LEONARD HALL in MD. Would anyone have any knowledge on LEONARD HALL are the HALL family in MD. I am trying to determine if ANNE HALL in Loughborough, Leicestershire County, Emgland and LEONARD HALL in MD. could be connected. Thanks, Marianne Dillow

I made a typo error in my previous posting on the Will of HENRY HARDY of Charles County. It should have read 21 Dec 1705....20 Sep 1714 : "To wife ANN, to Kinsman HENRY, son of GEORGE HARDY, and heirs, of Loughbrough, Lessester Cointy (Leicestershire County), residue of personalty and land afsd." Ex : PHILIP BRISCOE, and his son JOHN BRISCOE Overseer : WALTER STORY This is the information I received from Leicestershire, England yesterday : (1) HENRY HARDYE married ANNE HALL Family 2 Feb 1638 Loughborough, Leicester, England.... no church mentioned. (2) HENRY HARDYE Christening : 5 Nov 1687 All Saints, Loughborough, Leicester, England. Father: GEORGE HARDEY Family. I wanted to share this with the list. I apologize for my typo error in my previous posting. It probably was confusing. Marianne Dillow

I have received some information from, Leicestershire, England on the following will in Charles County : Will of HENRY HARDY 1678 in Charles County "To kinsman HENRY, son of GEORGE HARDY, and heirs of LOUGHBOROUGH, Lessester (Leicestershire County), residue of personalty and land afsd." The information I have received from Leicestershire, England is as follows : (1) HENRY HARDYE married ANNE HALL 2 Feb 1638 Loughborough, Leicestershire , England. (2) HENRY HARDYE Christened 5 Nov 1687 All Saints, loughbrough. Leicester, England. Father : GEORGE HARDEY Family. I wanted to share this with the list. Marianne Dillow

Hello again, List, I goofed on the reference below, It should have been REC 22 436, NOT REC 22 613. My apologies. - Bye from Bill Howard On Mar 26, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Bill Howard wrote: > Hello List, > > I have run across a name that MUST be a relation. I wonder if > anyone can identify him, his ancestors or his family and descendants. > He is: > Henson Barnes whose will or probate took place in Charles Co., MD 6 > January 1942. It is recorded in REC 22 613, according to the > Charles Co. Index of Wills. > Thanks, > - Bye from Bill Howard

I have run across a second name that MUST be a relation. I wonder if anyone can identify him, his ancestors or his family and descendants. He is: John Barnes whose will or probate took place in Charles Co., MD 1844. It is recorded in DJ 16 316, according to the Charles Co. Index of Wills. Thanks, - Bye from Bill Howard "History is the consensus of survivors in authority" "Reality is the weighted mean of individual perceptions"

Hello List, I have run across a name that MUST be a relation. I wonder if anyone can identify him, his ancestors or his family and descendants. He is: Henson Barnes whose will or probate took place in Charles Co., MD 6 January 1942. It is recorded in REC 22 613, according to the Charles Co. Index of Wills. Thanks, - Bye from Bill Howard "History is the consensus of survivors in authority" "Reality is the weighted mean of individual perceptions"

Ms. Lundgren, thank you so much for the new information about the disposal of the land called Promise by Thomas. I had hoped for possibly another tie with Susan Lomax that might more definitively identify which Susan(ah) (there were two) was the concerned party. John -----Original Message----- From: Norma Lundgren [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 6:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] Parcel of land called "Promise" The first one doesn't say how many acres and the tract called "Promise" containing 100 acres is mentioned in another deed. But none of the names below are connected with that other deed. p. 112, TLC Genealogy, Charles County Land Records, 1729-1733; Book M#2 Page 190. At the request of Susanah Lomax, the following power of attorney was recorded Mar 7, 1729. We, James Cashe and Mary, his wife, of Westmoreland County, Virginia, for sundry good causes, appointed our trusty friend Benjamin Posey of CC, our true and lawful attorney, to lease unto Susanah Lomax all that part of that tract of land in CC called Promise that has not been formerly sold to John Ralley, during the term until Thomas Ashman, son to sd Mary Cash, arrives to the age of 21 years. The yearly rent is 3 ears of Indian corn. Signed Feb 7, 1729 - James (X his mark) Cash, Mary (X her mark) Cash. Wit -John Hamill, Jno McNeill, Gusta Brown*, Benja Fendall*. Page 190. Feb 12, 1729/30 from Benjamin Posey of CC, carpenter, to Susanah Lomax of CC, spinster, for divers good causes and by virtue of a power of attorney to him directed from James Cash and Mary, his wife, of Westmoreland County, Virginia, the lease of all that part of that tract of land called Promise that has not been sold to John Railey. The land is at the head of Popes Cr in CC. To have and to hold, from today until Thomas Ashman, son to the above mentioned Mary Cash arrives at the age of 21 years, paying a yearly rent of 3 ears of Indian corn. Signed - Benja (B his mark) Posey. Wit - John Hamill, Jno McNeill, Gusta Brown*, Benjamin Fendall*. p. 69, TLC Genealogy, Charles Co Land Records 1756-1761 Book G#3 Page 393. Jul 22, 1759 from Thomas Ashman of Spotsilvenia County, Virginia, planter, to Moses Hobart of CC, carpenter, for 19 £ 18 shillings, part of a tract of land in William and Mary Parish in CC, called Promise, now in possession of sd Moses Hobart, bounded by a locust post near the head of Popes Cr, thence to the land of Pope now in the possession of Thomas Cotterell, containing and now laid out for about 60 acres. Also, one other tract of land called Ashmans Purchase, lying in the Parish and County last afd, bounded by the tract called Promise, thence to Marshall, Pope, containing and now laid out for about 41 acres. Signed - Thos Ashman. Wit - Jno Winter, George Dent, Phil R Fendall. Recorded Jan 21, 1760. Page 395. Power of Attorney. I, Thomas Ashman of Spoltsilvenia County, Virginia, planter, have appointed my trusty and well beloved friend, Moses Hobart of CC, to be my true and lawful attorney, to recover from everyone in Maryland, all such debts, money, and tobacco that are due me on bond, bill, note, account, or any otherwise. Signed Jul 22, 1759 - Thos Ashman. Wit - Jno Winter, Geo Dent. Recorded Jan 21, 1760. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Lomax" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 1:05 PM Subject: [MDCHARLE] Parcel of land called "Promise" > Susanah Lomax leased (for 3 ears of corn per year) the tract of land > known as "Promise" from James and Mary Cash via their representative > Benjamin Posey on 12 February 1729/30. "Promise" was owned at some > previous time by John Ralley and the land lay at the head of Popes > Creek. The lease was to expire when Thomas Ashman, son of Mary Cash, > reached the age of 21. James and Mary Cash lived in Westmoreland > County in the Colony of Virginia at that time. [Court Records Charles > County, MD, Book M, No. 2, p. 190/191] > > Does anyone know of possible associations among the Lomax, Ralley, > Ashman, and Cash families? What happened next to the land "Promise"? > Did Thomas Ashman inherit it, live there, or sell it? Any help would > be appreciated. > > John B. Lomax ([email protected]) > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

Trying to determine if he is connected to HANSON's of Charles County, Md. I have 16 Samuel Hanson's, but not this one! Samuel Hanson, born abt. 1750-died abt. 1821 in Morgan Cnty, GA. To Ga. abt. 1744? DAR Record: 101996 (I don't have record) Maybe had a brother, Thomas Hanson who married an Elizabeth Evans 2/20/1788 in Richmond, GA Thomas may have also married Rebecca Dulaney Anderson. Samuel married Margaret "Peggy" Simms/Sims b. 1762. Her parents may have been: William Simms, Jr. (born in Va. & Susannah Bullock b. 1720; d.bef.1803.) Married betw. 1733-38, Brunswick, Va. An Adam Symes & Mary M. Isham...may be conncected to William Simms, Jr.??? Samuel Hanson's had dau. Alizannah Hanson. His other children may have been: Thomas Whitfield Hanson, Elizabeth, Ann Hendley Hanson, Mary S., Richard W., Geo. W., John W., William & Samuel. Daughter, Alizannah, b. 11/20/1784; d 9/22/1854 in Salem, Alabama Married 10/11/1810 in Jackson, Ga. to Nathan ALDREDGE.b.abt. 1777. Has anyone heard of the" Chesapikers to Georgia" bunch? Thanks for any info on yet anothe Samuel Hanson MaryJo

I don't think there is a connection. This would be a set of accounts that should probably be pulled and read. It appears, at least to me, that it's a blend of two accounts--that of George Groves and that of Edmund Howard. Both men died about the same time. In fact, their wills are listed side by side in the Maryland Calendar of Wills. George Groves: 11/11/1713-1/3/1713 and Edmund Howard, 12/3/1709-1/5/1713. Linda Reno ----- Original Message ----- From: "Norma Lundgren" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 2:05 PM Subject: [MDCHARLE] Gwinn, Howard, Groves > Hi, List, > > Does anyone know how the Gwins and the Howards were connected? There are > these > two porbate entries that offer tantalizing hints that they were connected > and I > can't make sense of it. > > The first is an accounting for George Groves with John Gwinn as > Administrator > and shows "daughters" being due payment from the estate of Edmund Howard. > > The second shows Joseph Gwinn as surety of the estate of William Stevens > Howard. > > I might simply be getting too old to make the connection when I see it, > but > whatever, I'm not making it (grin). > > Maryland Genealogical Society Bulletin Fall 1985 Volume 26 Number 4; > Charles > County, MD: Probate Administration Accounts 1708-1738; Extracted from the > microfilm by Carol Gehrs Mitchell. > 80. George Groves dec'd acct of John Gwinn exer of will of George Grove. > From > John Groves on acct of estate of William Groves & to daus due from estate > Edm > Howard. Paid to John Rousby esq. rent of land, Rev. John(a) Cay sermon, > John > Groves admr of Wm Groves the son of Geo Groves Sr the balance of the > estate of > sd Geo Groves sr exec by dec'd Geo Groves jr., John Groves the son of > George > Groves sr in trust. 25 Feb 1714/15. > 500. Wm Stevens Howard dec'd acct of Henry Truman exor. of Sarah Howard > who was > exex of Wm Stevens Howard. Wm & Mary Parish, John Phillpott & Joseph Gwinn > of > Charles Co. sure. 3 June 1736. > > Norma > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Norma, Thank you. I have changed my papers to show Gerard's parents as John and Mary Wood. I wonder where "Norwood" is located in the county. The name is new to me. I had not really worked on Gerard Wood's family but this discussion which has been started got me very very interested. I have a large box of family papers--have no idea who wrote some of it, plus some photocopies from Christopher Johnston and the usual Maryland books. But I am VERY willing to be corrected--I just want to get it straight. I have also found, along the way, errors in Donnelly, Jordan and others. The only early dates that I swear to are from the Waverley Bible and the family list photocopied from the Bible of Thomas Harris, both of which I own. (I own his list--not his Bible). I have just wasted a beautiful afternoon scrolling the Wood families on Ancestry and find the 1754 birth date for Gerard Wood throughout. But--interestingly enough, I found the baptism date at Trinity of Dec. 30, 1758 for a GeraLd Wood--not GeraRd. This is the only entry with that date--the rest are 1754. My eyes got blurred at 1350 or so and I gave up. I don't really trust Ancestry but it is a starting point. What do you think? Now I wonder if there was a GeraLd and who was he. Or did the person submitting this get his ancestor's name wrong? Or is this just another shot in the dark? I also found some entries for the Gerard Wood, born 1767, whose parents were Mary Slye and Phillip Wood and who moved to Kentucky (Illinois?) His name is consistently given as Thomas Gerard Wood, so I was way off base there. I am making that correction on family papers. What do you think? One more thing--one entry says Dr. Gerard Wood was buried at Burling Hills, Faulkner. Never heard of Burling Hills but I do know Faulkner, MD. Maybe an old cemetery on a farm? I very much appreciate your help. Anne Johnson

Burling Hills may be Burlean Hall, also known as Mt. Pleasant. Shirley W

Good point, Linda. It is just confusing with what is mentioned in the History of Durham article and documentation it stated they used. Thanks for the thought MaryJo -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Linda Reno" <[email protected]> > Infertility was not just invented. > > Linda Reno > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 9:13 PM > Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] HANSON/McConchie/Macconchie > > > > It is just so odd....such large families way back then and then this > > couple had no children. Maybe they disowned all of them and made no > > mention of them??? > > > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > From: "Norma Lundgren" > > > >> Because they aren't God? (Grin). > >> > >> They could be wrong just like I can, but I don't think I am. No children > >> mentioned by either him or his wife in any documents. The William Jr. > >> mentioned > >> by that article (or at any rate some article referenced by someone to the > >> list > >> just recently) was actually his nephew. > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: > >> To: > >> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 5:43 PM > >> Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] HANSON/McConchie/Macconchie > >> > >> > >> > I'm confused....why would the article on the history of the Church > >> > state his > >> > son was a Rev./Rector there also and that there were other children? > >> > thanks > >> > > >> > -------------- Original message -------------- > >> > From: "Norma Lundgren" > >> > > >> >> He didn't have any children. > >> >> > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> From: > >> >> To: > >> >> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 3:58 PM > >> >> Subject: [MDCHARLE] HANSON/McConchie/Macconchie > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Moving on to my McConchie ancestors: > >> >> > I'm trying to find the children of Rev. Wm. McConchie (1685-1742) & > >> >> > wife, > >> >> > Mary > >> >> > Hanson. > >> >> > I know he had one son, Wm. Jr. , but an article I read sometime ago > >> >> > about > >> >> > Durham > >> >> > parish stated he had 5 children total. > >> >> > Any help appreciated. > >> >> > > >> >> > ------------------------------- > >> >> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >> >> > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > >> >> > the > >> >> > quotes > >> >> > in the subject and the body of the message > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >> >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >> >> quotes > >> >> in > >> >> the subject and the body of the message > >> > > >> > ------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >> > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >> > quotes > >> > in the subject and the body of the message > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >> quotes in > >> the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message

Thank you for that new info. You have a wealth of good data and are very generous with it. You deserve a medal (grin)! It is very frustrating for me to have only part of the data I dug up over the years. I think I've probably explained ad nauseam that I lost part of my info by letting my babies play with the family tree. But -- I have in my data a full-blooded sister, Mary Williams, for Alice Williams (wife of John Chapman), both daughters of James Williams, Sr. by an unknown wife between Mary Weylett and Grace. [Grace went on to marry Lawrence Rowland and Christopher Thompson.] I don't now have the notes that would tell me why I gave James Williams, Sr. this daughter, but I would have had a good reason. I DO remember that I added Mary Mullikin because of Brice Clagett's theory. In other words, it is possible that daughter Mary wasn't by Mary Weylett. Does anyone know what data I used to add a daughter Mary to James Williams, Sr. Bye, Norma ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fredric Z. Saunders" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 9:35 PM Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] The wives of Samuel Magruder and John Pottenger > Norma Lundgren [[email protected]] wrote: > >>Now the arguments for Sarah Pottenger and Mary Mullikin: >>From: "Clagett, Brice" <[email protected] >>To: [email protected] >>Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:21 PM >>Subject: Beall/Magruder.... > ======================== > > I didn't see a message come through from Norma about the subject, but Brice > Clagett retracted his own theory on the above. See his post: > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/gen-medieval/2002-05/1020271712 > > Rick Saunders > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.17/732 - Release Date: 3/24/2007 > 4:36 PM > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

It is just so odd....such large families way back then and then this couple had no children. Maybe they disowned all of them and made no mention of them??? -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Norma Lundgren" <[email protected]> > Because they aren't God? (Grin). > > They could be wrong just like I can, but I don't think I am. No children > mentioned by either him or his wife in any documents. The William Jr. mentioned > by that article (or at any rate some article referenced by someone to the list > just recently) was actually his nephew. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 5:43 PM > Subject: Re: [MDCHARLE] HANSON/McConchie/Macconchie > > > > I'm confused....why would the article on the history of the Church state his > > son was a Rev./Rector there also and that there were other children? > > thanks > > > > -------------- Original message -------------- > > From: "Norma Lundgren" > > > >> He didn't have any children. > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: > >> To: > >> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 3:58 PM > >> Subject: [MDCHARLE] HANSON/McConchie/Macconchie > >> > >> > >> > Moving on to my McConchie ancestors: > >> > I'm trying to find the children of Rev. Wm. McConchie (1685-1742) & wife, > >> > Mary > >> > Hanson. > >> > I know he had one son, Wm. Jr. , but an article I read sometime ago about > >> > Durham > >> > parish stated he had 5 children total. > >> > Any help appreciated. > >> > > >> > ------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >> > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >> > quotes > >> > in the subject and the body of the message > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > >> in > >> the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > > in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message

I'm confused....why would the article on the history of the Church state his son was a Rev./Rector there also and that there were other children? thanks -------------- Original message -------------- From: "Norma Lundgren" <[email protected]> > He didn't have any children. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 3:58 PM > Subject: [MDCHARLE] HANSON/McConchie/Macconchie > > > > Moving on to my McConchie ancestors: > > I'm trying to find the children of Rev. Wm. McConchie (1685-1742) & wife, Mary > > Hanson. > > I know he had one son, Wm. Jr. , but an article I read sometime ago about > > Durham > > parish stated he had 5 children total. > > Any help appreciated. > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > > in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message

Moving on to my McConchie ancestors: I'm trying to find the children of Rev. Wm. McConchie (1685-1742) & wife, Mary Hanson. I know he had one son, Wm. Jr. , but an article I read sometime ago about Durham parish stated he had 5 children total. Any help appreciated.