Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [MDBALT] Re: city directory 1892 or 1893
    2. Janice Zengel
    3. I found a Richard J. Connor in the Baltimore City directories, but he was there from 1892 through early 1900s so it doesn't sound like your Connor. occupation 1892-1901: painter 1892,1893 living at 780 McHenry 1894 living at 524 McMechen 1895 living at 1710 Prestman 1896,1897, 1898 living at 41 Jackson n 1899 living at 807 n Central av 1900 living at 437 e Madison 1901 living at 600 Forrest e 1902 no listing BUT 1903 a Richard J. Connor was listed with company "Corkran and Connor", carriage and wagon makers, Hillen c Forrest e I didn't look any further for him In one or more of the late 1890s directories (I didn't take notes- sorry) there was a Richard Connor also listed, but he was not there in 1893. [email protected] wrote > > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > Classification: Query > > Message Board URL: > > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/AFB.2ACI/3593.1.1.1.1 > > Message Board Post: > > Thanks Kathy. > The only connection to Baltimore I have is that this couple (my great grandparents) had this child (my great aunt) in Baltimore 1891 or 1892. I found the mother and children in the census in Minnesota (where ther other children were born) in 1880 and in 1900. I've not found RICHARD J.CONNOR listed anywhere except on the birth records of the Minnesota born children (including one in 1899). I don't know what they were dong in Maryland, or how long they were there. I thought if he was listed in a directory maybe I'd find his occupation. I have not tried to get the birth certificate from Md. > Thank you very much; Anything you find would be terrific. Until this weekend, I did not even know Richard's first name. > Pat > > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237

    06/24/2002 03:41:22