In a message dated 11/20/2006 6:20:16 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes: there is only one known account of that event. Do we really know how accurate this account is assuming the ad is correct? I watched the movie twice. Well, mostly listened as I was answering email at the same time. But they said at the very beginning that the basis of this movie was on the writings of Bradford, so we only have his account of the facts. But I also noticed that the author of the latest book, Mayflower was also interviewed and after having read it, I can see that the episodes regarding the Indians and their perspective might have come from this author as I seemed to view the book, as I was reading it, that it was trying to tell the events from the Indians point of view. I do remember reading that the Pilgrims had dug up graves, found food buried and that sort of thing and that part was relayed in the movie. Plus I also enjoyed the fact that there were professors and historians that were interjecting with comments periodically so that you got an understanding of some of the historical events. I felt the movie was very well done. The only thing that bothered me at the beginning was the term America, but Craig responded and indicated that the term America had been referenced at least 100 years before the Pilgrims actually arrived and well before Jamestown became a dot on any map. So, with his explanation in mind, when I saw the movie the second time around on the same time (it was repeated later and I happened to still be up and on the computer, so that's how I saw it twice), it didn't bother me so much. I felt it was fairly well balanced between telling the story from the Pilgrims point of view and that of the Indians. Perhaps the later was based on the influence of the new book, Mayflower. Christie Trapp