Pat: I didn't read all your remarks on the stuff Patricia sent in. The below was used as a trivia question today on one of my radio stations. If you disagree I'm sure you'd be on the phone with KRLA if you lived out here. Hee, hee, hee. =^..^= ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4. Men can read smaller print than women can; women can hear better. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

> Pat: > > I didn't read all your remarks on the stuff Patricia sent in. The below was > used as a trivia question today on one of my radio stations. If you disagree > I'm sure you'd be on the phone with KRLA if you lived out here. Hee, hee, > hee. > > =^..^= > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 4. Men can read smaller print than women can; women can hear better. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What I am saying is that people are sending this stuff around the Internet like lightning and yet no one bothers to stop and wonder if the stuff they are dutifully sending is TRUE. And, most of it is not. Yes, it has been proven that women can hear higher frequencies than men. But, as to the vision, I see no reason for two people who each see 20/20 to have a difference in what they see. If there is a difference, I am open to proof--I just am not open to this trivia stuff masquerading as fact. Pat