Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Home

Results for list 'matlock'

Total: 2/2
    1. [MATLOCK-L] William of 1702
    2. Joe Matlock

    3. I hesitate to publish much information on family that far back as I did not do the best job of keep my notes and sources straight when I first started. So now much of what I feel is correct, I can now only list as speculation to which I welcome all comments. Somebody some where has a Bible or deed or something that will point us in the right direction. Until then here is what I "think". Good Luck Joe Matlock Descendants of John Matlock Generation No. 1 1. JOHN4 MATLOCK (GEORGE3, JOHN THOMAS2, WILLIAM1) was born 09 September 1638 in Muskham,Nottinghamshire England, and died 16 January 1717/18 in New Kent County Virginia. He married (1) ANNE MOORE SOUTH 12 May 1657. She was born 1640 in Muskin, Nottingham, England, and died 23 March 1698/99 in St. Peters Parish, New Kent County Virginia. He married (2) MARGRET KENT 27 April 1701 in St. Peter's Parish New Kent County Virginia. She died 1718 in New Kent County Virginia. Notes for JOHN MATLOCK: THIS BRANCH OF THE FAMILY USES THE SURNAME MATLOCK. >From Gouldtown A Very Remarkable Settlement of Ancient Date William Steward, A.M. and Rev. Theophilus Steward, D.C. J.B. Lippincott Company - Philadelphia 1913. Page 36 "Besides the emigrants before mentioned, who arrived in the Ship Griffith with John Fenwick, were also Edward Wade, Samuel Hedge, Samuel Wade, John Smith and wife, Samuel Nichols, Richard Guy, Richard Noble, a surveyor, Richard Hancock, also a surveyor, John Pledyer, Hipolite LeFever and John Matlock. These came over in this, the first English ship that came to West Jersey and none followed for nearly two years." Page 37 "John Matlock is said to have been the son of Abram Matlock founder of Matlock College in England. (I have not seen this information before. If true this would explain inpart why John uses the surname Matlock and his brother William is Matlack JWM) More About JOHN MATLOCK: Emigration: Abt. 1677, To New Kent County Virginia Immigration: Abt. 1675, To New Jersey aboard the "Griffith" Child of JOHN MATLOCK and ANNE SOUTH is: 2. i. JOHN MOORE5 MATLOCK, b. 1683, New Kent County Virginia; d. 12 January 1732/33, New Kent County Virginia; Stepchild. Generation No. 2 2. JOHN MOORE5 MATLOCK (JOHN4, GEORGE3, JOHN THOMAS2, WILLIAM1) was born 1683 in New Kent County Virginia, and died 12 January 1732/33 in New Kent County Virginia. He married HESTER ANN WATSON 27 April 1701 in New Kent County Virginia. She was born 1684 in New Kent County Virginia, and died 1758 in New Kent County Virginia. Children of JOHN MATLOCK and HESTER WATSON are: i. AGNES6 MATLOCK. ii. ZACHARIAH MATLOCK. iii. GEORGE MATLOCK, b. 03 June 1701, St Peters Parish, New Kent County, Virginia; d. Abt. 1800, ??St. Martin's Parish, Hanover County, Virginia; m. HANNAH TROUTMAN. iv. WILLIAM MATLOCK, b. 17 July 1702, New Kent County Virginia; d. 16 December 1767, Bedford County Virginia; m. (1) ANNE ELIZABETH MOORE; b. 18 January 1702/03; d. 1735, Virginia.; m. (2) ELIZABETH WITT, Abt. 1720; b. 1706. v. THOMAS MATLOCK, b. 21 November 1703, New Kent County, Virginia. vi. DAVID MATLOCK, b. Abt. 1704. vii. UNKNOWN MATLOCK, b. 12 August 1705; d. 12 August 1705. viii. NATHANIEL MATLOCK, b. 05 October 1707, New Kent County, Virginia. ix. NICHOLAS MATLOCK, b. 16 March 1709/10, Virginia; d. July 1780; m. MARY JANE SHELTON, 1733. x. JOHN MOORE MATLOCK, b. 24 May 1712, New Kent County Virginia; d. 07 August 1785, Louisa County, Virginia; m. ANNE ELIZABETH SOUTH, 1729, Virginia; b. 02 March 1712/13, New Kent County Virginia; d. 17 November 1775, Louisa County, Virginia. xi. MARY MATLOCK, b. 18 December 1716, New Kent County, Virginia; m. BENJAMIN F. JOHNSON, 1732; b. Abt. 1703, Maryland. xii. BENJAMIN MATLOCK, b. 1717; d. 1717. >>> "James & Celeste Matlock" <[email protected]> 04/30/01 10:38AM >>> Thank you Joe, And that looks like what I have so far. The only question I have is how confident are you of the Jason Sr., Moore, William 1702 lineage? It seemed right to me but Wanda was telling me that, while she lists the William father of Moore line in her charts, there are some who think that a John married to Ann was father of Moore. I've been trying to find more information to support either one. Best, James

    04/30/2001 07:33:33
    1. RE: [MATLOCK-L] William of 1702
    2. James & Celeste Matlock

    3. So you are listing William Matlock b. 1702 as the son of John Matlock Jr. in this case rather than the Sr. I've looked at it both ways, especially give the following information that Wanda shared with me: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Abstract from "Register of St. Peter's Parish, New Kent County, VA, 1684-1786": (1)Pg 21, Jno Medlock listed St. Peter's Parish along with Jam Moor; (2)Pg 373, George Son of John medlock Ju& baptiz ye. 8 June 1701; (3)Pg 374, William Son of Jno medlock baptiz the 19 July 1702. (4)Pg 374, Thomas Son of Jno medlock Ju& baptiz the 21 nov& 1703; (5)Pg 413, Jno medlock and (blank) married the 27 aprill 1701; (6)Pg 437, Anne wife of Jno medlock dyed the 23 march 1699/700. *Listed as Ju& and Jno. Only 2 children with father as Jno Ju&; George and Thomas and notice that Jno& son was born in 1701. Jno Sr. who had William in 1702 is listed without the Ju&. So I would assume that who ever wrote these in the Vestry book knew the difference between the two men. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- It is obvious that the last entry is for John Sr. father of John Jr. as it lists the death of his wife Anne. The other entries could all be for John Jr. or they could be a mixture of John Jr. or John Sr. depending on who the was getting married 27 April 1701. From this I can see two equally plausible scenarios. Scenario 1: George, William, and Thomas were all sons of John Matlock Jr. Their birthdays are certainly far enough apart for John Jr. to have fathered all three with Hester. The omission of Jr where John's name is mentioned in conjunction with William's birth was either an oversight or it was done by a different person than for the other two births. Also that John Matlock Jr. married Hester Watson on the 27 April 1701 and they had a son George three months later. Scenario 2: George and Thomas are sons of John Matlock Jr. Anne wife of John Sr. died and John remarried two years later to a younger person not named. This would not have been uncommon for the time. They had a son William the following year. John would have been 64, not too old to father another child. The use of Jr. in the registry was used to distinguish between the two John's. Unless someone has more evidence to point in one direction or the other I see both cases as equally plausible. Best, James > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Matlock [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 11:34 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [MATLOCK-L] William of 1702 > > > I hesitate to publish much information on family that far back as > I did not do the best job of keep my notes and sources straight > when I first started. So now much of what I feel is correct, I > can now only list as speculation to which I welcome all comments. > Somebody some where has a Bible or deed or something that will > point us in the right direction. Until then here is what I "think". > Good Luck > Joe Matlock > > Descendants of John Matlock > > > Generation No. 1 > > 1. JOHN4 MATLOCK (GEORGE3, JOHN THOMAS2, WILLIAM1) was born 09 > September 1638 in Muskham,Nottinghamshire England, and died 16 > January 1717/18 in New Kent County Virginia. He married (1) ANNE > MOORE SOUTH 12 May 1657. She was born 1640 in Muskin, > Nottingham, England, and died 23 March 1698/99 in St. Peters > Parish, New Kent County Virginia. He married (2) MARGRET KENT 27 > April 1701 in St. Peter's Parish New Kent County Virginia. She > died 1718 in New Kent County Virginia. > > Notes for JOHN MATLOCK: > THIS BRANCH OF THE FAMILY USES THE SURNAME MATLOCK. > > >From Gouldtown A Very Remarkable Settlement of Ancient Date > William Steward, A.M. and Rev. Theophilus Steward, D.C. > J.B. Lippincott Company - Philadelphia 1913. > > Page 36 "Besides the emigrants before mentioned, who arrived in > the Ship Griffith with John Fenwick, were also Edward Wade, > Samuel Hedge, Samuel Wade, John Smith and wife, Samuel Nichols, > Richard Guy, Richard Noble, a surveyor, Richard Hancock, also a > surveyor, John Pledyer, Hipolite LeFever and John Matlock. These > came over in this, the first English ship that came to West > Jersey and none followed for nearly two years." > > Page 37 "John Matlock is said to have been the son of Abram > Matlock founder of Matlock College in England. > > (I have not seen this information before. If true this would > explain inpart why John uses the surname Matlock and his brother > William is Matlack JWM) > > More About JOHN MATLOCK: > Emigration: Abt. 1677, To New Kent County Virginia > Immigration: Abt. 1675, To New Jersey aboard the "Griffith" > > Child of JOHN MATLOCK and ANNE SOUTH is: > 2. i. JOHN MOORE5 MATLOCK, b. 1683, New Kent County Virginia; d. > 12 January 1732/33, New Kent County Virginia; Stepchild. > > > Generation No. 2 > > 2. JOHN MOORE5 MATLOCK (JOHN4, GEORGE3, JOHN THOMAS2, WILLIAM1) > was born 1683 in New Kent County Virginia, and died 12 January > 1732/33 in New Kent County Virginia. He married HESTER ANN > WATSON 27 April 1701 in New Kent County Virginia. She was born > 1684 in New Kent County Virginia, and died 1758 in New Kent > County Virginia. > > Children of JOHN MATLOCK and HESTER WATSON are: > i. AGNES6 MATLOCK. > ii. ZACHARIAH MATLOCK. > iii. GEORGE MATLOCK, b. 03 June 1701, St Peters Parish, New Kent > County, Virginia; d. Abt. 1800, ??St. Martin's Parish, Hanover > County, Virginia; m. HANNAH TROUTMAN. > iv. WILLIAM MATLOCK, b. 17 July 1702, New Kent County Virginia; > d. 16 December 1767, Bedford County Virginia; m. (1) ANNE > ELIZABETH MOORE; b. 18 January 1702/03; d. 1735, Virginia.; m. > (2) ELIZABETH WITT, Abt. 1720; b. 1706. > v. THOMAS MATLOCK, b. 21 November 1703, New Kent County, Virginia. > vi. DAVID MATLOCK, b. Abt. 1704. > vii. UNKNOWN MATLOCK, b. 12 August 1705; d. 12 August 1705. > viii. NATHANIEL MATLOCK, b. 05 October 1707, New Kent County, Virginia. > ix. NICHOLAS MATLOCK, b. 16 March 1709/10, Virginia; d. July > 1780; m. MARY JANE SHELTON, 1733. > x. JOHN MOORE MATLOCK, b. 24 May 1712, New Kent County Virginia; > d. 07 August 1785, Louisa County, Virginia; m. ANNE ELIZABETH > SOUTH, 1729, Virginia; b. 02 March 1712/13, New Kent County > Virginia; d. 17 November 1775, Louisa County, Virginia. > xi. MARY MATLOCK, b. 18 December 1716, New Kent County, > Virginia; m. BENJAMIN F. JOHNSON, 1732; b. Abt. 1703, Maryland. > xii. BENJAMIN MATLOCK, b. 1717; d. 1717. > > > > >>> "James & Celeste Matlock" <[email protected]> 04/30/01 10:38AM >>> > Thank you Joe, > > And that looks like what I have so far. The only question I have > is how confident are you of the Jason Sr., Moore, William 1702 > lineage? It seemed right to me but Wanda was telling me that, while > she lists the William father of Moore line in her charts, there are > some who think that a John married to Ann was father of Moore. I've > been trying to find more information to support either one. > > Best, > > James > > > ==== MATLOCK Mailing List ==== > GREAT search engines! http://www.theultimates.com/ (6 engines in one!) > http://www.metacrawler.com/ (10 engines in one!) > http://www.bc1.com/users/sgl/ (focused on genealogy links) > >

    05/01/2001 04:51:43