Joe I agree with you on Thomas.. The burial record for Thomas, 18 June 1656, states he was the son of George. There are three burial records for George Matlock. I question which George each of these were. To review. April 1573 George Matlock baptized. 27 April 1606 George son of John baptized. 7 November 1636 George Matlocke married Jane Hall. This would be 1606 George. Between 1638 and 1646 George, son of George and Jane baptized. 26 March 1675 George son of George and Ann baptized. So, if we have three burial records for George and four baptismal records for George, which George could have been buried when? George Matlock, buried 15 November 1658 could be 1573 George or 1606 George. 1573 George based on age and 1606 George because he had no known children after Thomas in 1656. George Matlocke, buried June 1683 could be any of the last three. 1573 George would have been 110 years old. George Matchlock buried 23 October 1707 could be George baptized between 1638 and 1646 or his son George, baptized 1675. This time 1606 George looks to be to old, 101. If George and Jane came to America after their son George was baptized in 1675, either they left their son in England, not likely, or there is another George who was buried in 1707. The George most likely unaccounted for in the burial records is the son of George and Ann. If a George Matlock came to America from Cropwell Bishop, he is the most likely candidate. That would make him the nephew of John and William. I hope all these George’s didn’t confuse you as much as they did me. I would like to see your take on the Cropwell Bishop records. Curt Miller .