Hello Edie,   No, that's what Piers was trying to tell you. The American Lloyd's continued to list her until 1869, but without any solid evidence that she was still in existence after 1863. She could still very well be your BUDGET/COLOMBO.   Regards, Adi --- On Wed, 7/27/11, Edie McArthur <ediemc@bigpond.com> wrote: BUDGET continues to appear in editions up to 1869, but it should be noted that in 1869 she was recorded as last "seen" in NY in 1863, so it goes to show that such things aren't necessarily all that accurate and shouldn't be absolutely relied upon! So if she was being recorded still in 1869 not our Colombo. Edie

I amseeing that now. Thanks for all of your hard work too Adi. Especially for all the newspape reports. Much appreciated. Edie ----- Original Message ----- From: Mme_N_Carmichael To: alex borgogno ; mariners-l@rootsweb.com ; Edie McArthur Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 12:29 AM Subject: Re: [MAR] Colombo/Bridget/Budget Hello Edie, No, that's what Piers was trying to tell you. The American Lloyd's continued to list her until 1869, but without any solid evidence that she was still in existence after 1863. She could still very well be your BUDGET/COLOMBO. Regards, Adi --- On Wed, 7/27/11, Edie McArthur <ediemc@bigpond.com> wrote: BUDGET continues to appear in editions up to 1869, but it should be noted that in 1869 she was recorded as last "seen" in NY in 1863, so it goes to show that such things aren't necessarily all that accurate and shouldn't be absolutely relied upon! So if she was being recorded still in 1869 not our Colombo. Edie