Harlow is correct - James Steward of the ship Fortune received one share in the 1623 land division but was not mentioned in the 1627 cattle division. This means that he either died or removed from the area during these two dates. Susan E. Roser. www.rootsweb.com/~canms/canada.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harlow Chandler" <chandler@firstva.com> To: <MAPLYMOU-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 6:37 PM Subject: RE: [PLY/MA] James Steward, Ship Fortune 1621 > ***-----Original Message----- > ***From: George Drennon [mailto:gdrennon@islc.net] > ***Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2002 3:17 PM > ***To: MAPLYMOU-L@rootsweb.com > ***Subject: [PLY/MA] James Steward, Ship Fortune 1621 > *** > *** > ***Looking for any information that may link me to the subject individual. I > ***have a Daniel Steward (Stewart) b. 1697 Rochester, Ma. may have been the > ***grandson to this James. Daniel's son Elkanah Steward (Stewart) moved from > ***Massachusetts sometime before 1779 as he appears in records for Barnard, > ***Windsor Co., Vt by this time. It is also believed that his > ***father Daniel may > ***have gone with him. Any help with this family would be > ***greatfully accepted. > *** > *** > *** > *** George Drennon > > George, I thought James of the Fortune was assumed to have died without > issue before the cattle division of 1627. Is this incorrect? >