Hate to clutter up your mailboxes, but see I have made another error. My thanks to Susan who tells me that Thomas Whiton was not the progenitor of the Whiton line I quoted previously, and therefore I should not have listed him in my former note. My Whiton line therefore begins James WHITON/1, James WHITON/2, Joseph WHITON/3, Alice WHITON/4 (m. Ransom CURTIS). I certainly do appreciate input. ---Merriel