This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Surnames: Hart Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/2135.1 Message Board Post: The only HART birth in Vital records of Colrain, Massachusetts to the end of the year 1849 Salem, Mass.: Essex Institute, 1934: Andrew Jackson Hart, son of Alexander, native of Scotland, born 20 May 1827. No CRANE births. Marriages, p. 86 Alexand(er) Hart and Betsey Hart, both of Colrain, intentions 3 July 1820 There are a few other HART marriages, for females, and one male 1830. Deaths: Charles, unmarried, laborer, drunkenness, age 55 years, 22 Aug. 1849 Peter, sudden, July 5, 1830, age about 80 years, church record. No HART was a "resident" of Colrain in 1798. Regards, Shari Strahan

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/4EB.2ACE/2135 Message Board Post: Alexander Hart was born in Coleraine, Mass abt. 1818. Father John. He married a Jane Baxter Crane . Thanks, Lynne

Sarah and William are back together in the 1900 census in Greenfield--she must not have committed too bad of a crime! ----- Original Message ----- From: <JMC@141.COM> To: <MAFRANKL-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:06 PM Subject: [MAFRANKL] Parkers in Deerfield 1870 > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > Surnames: Parker > Classification: Query > > Message Board URL: > > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/4EB.2ACE/2134 > > Message Board Post: > > I am looking to find out what happened to the Parker Family listed in the 1870 census. They are William and Sarah with children Clara, John, Joseph, Sarah E., William and Mary. In 1880 census I can only find Sarah E. working as a servent, Clara working as a servent and Sarah the morther in jail. > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MAFRANKL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I looked at NEHGS records for the Parker name in Deerfield. The records are there for birth of John Edward, Joseph Henry, Sarah Elizabeth, William Rosbe, Mary Jane to parents William R Parker b England and Sarah R Parker(one record gives O'Keefe as maiden name) b Ireland. Clara's birth record is in nearby Greenfield. There is a death record for the husband William R Parker at age 68 in Greenfield in 1902. I did not find any other family member death records. NEHGS also shows a William R Parker Jr as married in Montague 1903, but there is not an image available for me to verify it is the son. So when you look for records, look all around Franklin Co instead of just in Deerfield! Donna in NC ----- Original Message ----- From: <JMC@141.COM> To: <MAFRANKL-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 5:06 PM Subject: [MAFRANKL] Parkers in Deerfield 1870 > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > Surnames: Parker > Classification: Query > > Message Board URL: > > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/4EB.2ACE/2134 > > Message Board Post: > > I am looking to find out what happened to the Parker Family listed in the 1870 census. They are William and Sarah with children Clara, John, Joseph, Sarah E., William and Mary. In 1880 census I can only find Sarah E. working as a servent, Clara working as a servent and Sarah the morther in jail. > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MAFRANKL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Surnames: Parker Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/4EB.2ACE/2134 Message Board Post: I am looking to find out what happened to the Parker Family listed in the 1870 census. They are William and Sarah with children Clara, John, Joseph, Sarah E., William and Mary. In 1880 census I can only find Sarah E. working as a servent, Clara working as a servent and Sarah the morther in jail.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/4EB.2ACE/86.223.1.2 Message Board Post: Cheryl-- I have a Clarissa Stearns, daughter of Abbott Stearns (And Lydia Wright), Salem, Massachusetts; Clarissa reportedly born 1/31/1795 in Billerica. Dont know if this fits for you. Feel free to contact me directly at elizabeth001@msn.com Thank you, Elizabeth

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Surnames: Doolittle Classification: Biography Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/1007.2.1.1 Message Board Post: Nancy, If you loved those, you'll love this : A History of the Town of Northfield, Massachusetts: For 150 Years: with an account of the prior occupation... p. 144: Rev. Benjamin Doolittle -- After the close of Mr. Whitmore's half-year, in April, no minister was employed till late in the fall. But the numbers and ability of the inhabitants already there and now about to come, appeared to require and to warrant a permanent ministry. With this view the Committee made an engagement with Mr. Benjamine Doolittle of Wallingford, Ct., to supply for the winter, and he commenced to preach the second Sabbath in November; -- beginning what proved to be a long and prosperous pastorate. It is very likely that the engagement of Mr. D. was brought about through the influence of the Mattoons, who came from Wallingford, via Deerfield. And his settlement in the ministry at Northfield brought hither the Merriman and Blaksley families, with which his family was connected by marriage. p. 163: Physician. Rev. Mr. Doolittle combined the two professions of theology and medicine. He was a regularly educated physician and surgeon, and was furnished with books and instruments, and kept a supply of drugs. His own townsmen, and the inhabitants of the new settlements as they were made, above Northfield, and the garrisons of Ft. Dummer, and the Ashuelots, and No. 4, depended on his services; and in the battles and skirmishes of the old French war, the wounded were brought to him for treatment. In his prime, his medical practice became so large and lucrative as to awaken some jealousy among his tax-paying parishioners, as will appear in a subsequent chapter. p. 230: Mr. Doolittle's Troubles. -- The recorded action of the town shows that the first 17 years of Mr. Doolittle's pastorate in Northfield was highly acceptable to the people. In 1733, the town voted, "To give Rev. Mr. Doolittle the sum of fifteen pounds additional salary, in money or bills of credit, during his continuance in the work of the ministry among us." This vote furnishes unmistakable evidence of respect and confidence. But in 1736 or 37, a disaffection arose. His medical and surgical practice was extensive and lucrative, and in the opinion of some interfered with his ministerial duties. He also differed from some of his leading church members in his views of religious doctrine. A Memorandum, in the hand-writing of Lieut. Eliezur Wright, indicates -- without explaining -- the principal point of the controversy: "1. the fall of the money; 2. the use of the L100; 3. the wood; 4. his entering a complaint to the Court and withdrawing his action; 5. his telling the town he would not lay down doctoring and chirurgery under 400 pounds a year; 6. his refusing to comply with the Association's and the Court's advice for a mutual council; 7. his practice of doctoring and chirurgery, and acting as proprietor's clerk for Winchester, contrary to the town's mind." The leading families that sided with Mr. D. were the Fields, Alexanders, Strattons, Beldings, Hunt, Evans, Petty, Beaman, and William Holton; his leading opposers were the Mattoons, Wrights, Merrimans, Jonathan Janes, Joseph Stebbins, Eleazar Holton, Samuel Smith [future father-in-law of his son Amzi], Nathaniel Dickinson, and Daniel Shattuck. A strong majority of numbers upheld the pastor; and the removal from town of Dea. Eleazar Mattoon, from dislike to Mr. D., weakened the minority. Feb. 26, 1739, the following paper was handed to Mr. Doolittle: "Revnd Sir: You have a long time been acquainted with the un??? we labor under respecting for?? the doctrines you have delivered from the pulpit and in private conversation, and we judge the following proposals very reasonable, and desire your compliance with them: 1. We judge it highly reasonable we should be heard upon the objections we have to make against some of the doctrines you have delivered as aforesaid, which doctrines we judge to be Arminianism. [See explanation of Arminianism below.] 2. We judge it very reasonable you should join with us in choosing a Council of ministers and others, indifferent to the cause, to hear our matters of objection. 3. We judge it reasonable that you should have a copy of the matters of charge we have against you, a week before ???? of the Council aforesaid. 4. We judge it reasonable that the parties should be obliged to abide by the determination of such Council, that the controversies between us may be ended. By abiding by the determination of ye Council we mean, y? if the Council shall [p. 231:] judge yt we have proved that you have advanced many of ye Arminian doctrines, the relation you stand in to us as our pastor and preacher shall be dissolved. But if they judge otherwise, we are willing you should continue to be our pastor. 5. If you think what is above proposed, in whole or in part unreasonable, we desire you propose something that is reasonable. We desire your answer in writing within two days. Signed by Capt. Benj. Wright, and 18 others." No answer to these proposals was received, and the disaffected brethren applied to Rev. William Williams the venerable minister of Hatfield, for advice. His answer, dated Mar. 2, 1739, breathes the spirit of true wisdom and christian charity, and recommends substantially the line of action contemplated in the proposals just quoted. He suggests, in addition, that "the matter be referred to the next meeting of the Association, which for aught I know, if desired, may be at your town." A meeting of the Hampshire Association was held at Northfield May 3, 1739 and Capt. Wright and those acting with him applied to it for advice. The Association recommended, 1. that the members of the church use all proper methods among themselves to heal the dissensions and secure harmony, by humble prayer to the God of peace, and by the earnest culture of the spirit of mutual good will; by treating your pastor with respect and good temper; by endeavoring to learn his principles by calm conversation with him, and careful attendance upon his public ministry for the space of half a year. 2. If all these means shall fail, then we recommend the calling of a mutual Council. 3. If such a Council be called, we recommend that you agree upon such churches as are known to be sound and orthodox in the faith, and not directly related to either side; and that you furnish the pastor in writing, two weeks beforehand, all the particulars which you have against him. 4. That you pledge your! selves to abide by the decision of the Council. But the disaffected brethren declined to call upon Mr. Doolittle for the "calm conversation"; and Mr. Doolittle declined to unite with them in calling a Council. Another appeal was made to the Association at its meeting in West Springfield, April, 1740, and that body repeated its advice of last year. In the fall, the matter was carried (by which party is unknown) to the County court in session in Springfield. In response, the Justices sent a letter addressed "To the selectmen of the town of Northfield, to be communicated to said town," in which they declare that, although, "this affair was not directly within their province, yet [p. 232] being desirous that peace may be promoted and religion flourish amongst the people," they advise "a compliance with the advice of the Association, without making any additions thereto, or without any strained constructions put thereon, readily and speedily to conform to it." To understand the exact nature and bearings of this controversy, and the zeal of the two parties -- the one in favor of submitting the matter to an Ecclesiastical Council, and the other in opposition to that course -- it is to be borne in mind that this was the period of the "Great Awakening" which attended the preaching of Rev. Jonathan Edwards then of Northampton, and that men's opinions on doctrinal points were becoming very sharply defined. The strong majority in his favor in the church, probably influenced the pastor to decline all overtures for a public hearing and adjudication. The following paper, in the hand-writing of Mr. Doolittle, shows how the difficulty was settled -- though probably not healed [it appears to have been read and the action taken at the close of the afternoon service on the Sabbath]: "Northfield, February 27, A.D. 1740-41. To ye Church of Christ in Northfield. Brethren, There has been a great noise about my Principals which has been very wounding to Religion and hurtful to peace and unity among us: and I now make a demand of all those who have any thing to object against my Principals to come to me and tell me ye very particular article they object against, to see if I can satisfy them, and if I don't satisfy them, then to bring it to the Church, or else to hold your peace forever hereafter: and this in order that the matter may be healed among ourselves, according to the advice of the Association: Brethren, if it be your minds that those that have any thing to object against my Principals should do as I have now demanded of them, manifest it by lifting up the hand. Voted in ye Affirmative." [end transcription from history of northfield] ARMINIANISM (from Wikipedia.com): Arminianism holds to the following tenets: * Humans are naturally unable to make any effort towards salvation * Salvation is possible by grace alone * Works of human effort can not cause or contribute to salvation * God's election is conditional on faith in Jesus * Jesus' atonement was potentially for all people * God allows his grace to be resisted by those unwilling to believe * Salvation can be lost, as continued salvation is conditional upon continued faith Enjoy!

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Surnames: Doolittle, Todd, Stevens Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/4EB.2ACE/1007.2.1 Message Board Post: These quotes are wonderful. Thank you for printing them. He graduated from Yale, Class of 1716. Known more for his medicine than his preaching!

The Church in Orange at that time, is not the North Orange Community Church. I do not know if they have any records themselves, as Orange in that time was in a twilight zone. When the the Orange church broke from the Athol church and established themselves, the norm would be to found a new town. After all, land was taken from Athol, Royalston, and Warwick to form the new parish. However, at that time, each town had one representitive in the Massachusetts General Courty (legislature). The eastern towns felt that their votes would be deluted by the creation of towns in the western part of the commonwelath. Therefore until 1810, Orange was a district, not a town. As such, it had no town functions, thought existed as a town. Thus, there were no vital records collected, nor a representitive to the General Court appointed. The vital records of this period, can be found in the later Orange records, and in the records of the three towns Orange was formed from. Regards, Rob Roy -----Original Message----- From: mafrankl-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:mafrankl-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of mckenzie_market@mckenzievalleymarket.com Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 2:52 PM To: mafrankl@rootsweb.com Subject: [MAFRANKL] Church records for Orange 1784 to 1800 Would anyone know of where to locate the church records and name of the church located in Orange, Franklin County, Mass. I believe that Orange would have still been part of Old Hanpshire County in this time frame. Daniel ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to MAFRANKL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

We have discussed this before but at that time I only had a link to a Jay Mack Holbrook who has a 23 page micro-fiche on the vital records of Orange 1767 - 1891. So we know that somehow or some way vitals were kept for the town village, whatever it was. Mr. Holbrook apparently lives in Oxford Mass.I was hoping that since there are vitals that maybe there was a church. I don't know what church or if it was a church in one of the other parts of the new town. Since we know that Orange was made up of parts of three or more towns do you think that maybe I should look there? What I am looking for is the marriage of Stephen King and Sarah Demom of New Salem married in Orange 18 November 1784. The vital record that I have found gives the date and adds that both of these people were "OF NEW SALEM". If this is the case will I or should I be looking in New Salem? or one of the other parts of the towns that Orange was made up of at that time and if this is the case where will I find the vitals and the church records if they are of the older towns. What I am really looking for is the names of Stephen King's parents. I believe that his father would be William King (son of Jonathan and Sarah (Cooke) King of Salem and Sutton respectively. At some point a Rufus King of Yonkers had tried to link William King to Mary Andrew daughter of Captain Nathaniel and Mary (Higginson) Andrew of Salem. The problem with this is that the William King who actually married Mary Andrew was a first cousin son of Samuel and Widow Elizabeth Barton born in 1729 and this Mary died in 1759 while the second wife of my William had the children Amos in 1756, Sarah in 1759, Jonathan in 1761, and Stephen in about 1765 at Shutesbury but probably raised or came back to New Salem at some date before 1790 as did all the other children of William King who came back as a widower to live again with Amos Foster his deceased sister Abigail King's husband who had remarried after her death. I have them pretty well traced but I don't have the name of the four King children's mother or when she died either. Thanks Daniel > The Church in Orange at that time, is not the North Orange Community > Church. > I do not know if they have any records themselves, as Orange in that time > was in a twilight zone. When the the Orange church broke from the Athol > church and established themselves, the norm would be to found a new town. > After all, land was taken from Athol, Royalston, and Warwick to form the > new > parish. However, at that time, each town had one representitive in the > Massachusetts General Courty (legislature). The eastern towns felt that > their votes would be deluted by the creation of towns in the western part > of > the commonwelath. Therefore until 1810, Orange was a district, not a > town. > As such, it had no town functions, thought existed as a town. Thus, there > were no vital records collected, nor a representitive to the General Court > appointed. The vital records of this period, can be found in the later > Orange records, and in the records of the three towns Orange was formed > from. > > Regards, > Rob Roy > > -----Original Message----- > From: mafrankl-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:mafrankl-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of mckenzie_market@mckenzievalleymarket.com > Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 2:52 PM > To: mafrankl@rootsweb.com > Subject: [MAFRANKL] Church records for Orange 1784 to 1800 > > Would anyone know of where to locate the church records and name of the > church located in Orange, Franklin County, Mass. I believe that Orange > would have still been part of Old Hanpshire County in this time frame. > > Daniel > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MAFRANKL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MAFRANKL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

P.S. Thomas Barber is buried 16 Apr 1819, age 77, Wardsboro, Windham, Vt. Could not find Hannah. Bonnie ----- Original Message ----- From: <jillainedc@yahoo.com> To: <MAFRANKL-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 11:41 AM Subject: [MAFRANKL] Vital Records of Warwick: Births = Baptisms? > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > Surnames: Barber, Miller > Classification: Query > > Message Board URL: > > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/2126 > > Message Board Post: > > For those familiar with the vital records of births in Warwick, MA: were > these births or baptisms? Were they civil records of births, or were they > church records of baptisms? Or some combo (did the town clerk record those > who were baptized over in the church?) I.e., was there any difference > between church and civil records, given that back in the 1760s and 1770s, > the town hired the preacher and there was not the separation of church and > state as we know it today? > > The reason I ask is this: > My husband's ancestors, Thomas Barber and his wife Hannah Miller, had > several children while they lived in Warwick. The only child of theirs > recorded in the Warwick VR was born in 1770. But Blake's history of > Warwick makes reference to Thomas and Hannah being in the town as late as > 1777 or 1778. Hannah had more children during that time, but the > births/baptisms are not recorded in Warwick. > > I believe that they weren't recorded because I believe Thomas and Hannah > did not baptize their children. I believe that Thomas or at least Hannah > were Baptists and did not believe in baptizing their infant children. And > hence the children's births were not recorded. > > This theory would be strengthened if the births recorded in the town came > from the church-- to which Hannah and Thomas may NOT have belonged. > > Thoughts? Suggestions? > > Thanks! > > -- Jillaine Smith > Washington DC > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MAFRANKL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I found the intention for Thomas Barber and Hannah Miller in Rehoboth, 7 Apr 1768. Also, children of Joseph Jr, and Esther, lists a Thomas b 30 Dec 1742. There is a child, Esther, of Thomas & Hannah b 11 Nov, 1768. Bonnie ----- Original Message ----- From: <jillainedc@yahoo.com> To: <MAFRANKL-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 11:41 AM Subject: [MAFRANKL] Vital Records of Warwick: Births = Baptisms? > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > Surnames: Barber, Miller > Classification: Query > > Message Board URL: > > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/2126 > > Message Board Post: > > For those familiar with the vital records of births in Warwick, MA: were > these births or baptisms? Were they civil records of births, or were they > church records of baptisms? Or some combo (did the town clerk record those > who were baptized over in the church?) I.e., was there any difference > between church and civil records, given that back in the 1760s and 1770s, > the town hired the preacher and there was not the separation of church and > state as we know it today? > > The reason I ask is this: > My husband's ancestors, Thomas Barber and his wife Hannah Miller, had > several children while they lived in Warwick. The only child of theirs > recorded in the Warwick VR was born in 1770. But Blake's history of > Warwick makes reference to Thomas and Hannah being in the town as late as > 1777 or 1778. Hannah had more children during that time, but the > births/baptisms are not recorded in Warwick. > > I believe that they weren't recorded because I believe Thomas and Hannah > did not baptize their children. I believe that Thomas or at least Hannah > were Baptists and did not believe in baptizing their infant children. And > hence the children's births were not recorded. > > This theory would be strengthened if the births recorded in the town came > from the church-- to which Hannah and Thomas may NOT have belonged. > > Thoughts? Suggestions? > > Thanks! > > -- Jillaine Smith > Washington DC > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MAFRANKL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Would anyone know of where to locate the church records and name of the church located in Orange, Franklin County, Mass. I believe that Orange would have still been part of Old Hanpshire County in this time frame. Daniel

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Surnames: Barber, Miller Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/2126 Message Board Post: For those familiar with the vital records of births in Warwick, MA: were these births or baptisms? Were they civil records of births, or were they church records of baptisms? Or some combo (did the town clerk record those who were baptized over in the church?) I.e., was there any difference between church and civil records, given that back in the 1760s and 1770s, the town hired the preacher and there was not the separation of church and state as we know it today? The reason I ask is this: My husband's ancestors, Thomas Barber and his wife Hannah Miller, had several children while they lived in Warwick. The only child of theirs recorded in the Warwick VR was born in 1770. But Blake's history of Warwick makes reference to Thomas and Hannah being in the town as late as 1777 or 1778. Hannah had more children during that time, but the births/baptisms are not recorded in Warwick. I believe that they weren't recorded because I believe Thomas and Hannah did not baptize their children. I believe that Thomas or at least Hannah were Baptists and did not believe in baptizing their infant children. And hence the children's births were not recorded. This theory would be strengthened if the births recorded in the town came from the church-- to which Hannah and Thomas may NOT have belonged. Thoughts? Suggestions? Thanks! -- Jillaine Smith Washington DC

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Surnames: Doolittle, Chapin Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/1007.2 Message Board Post: Nancy, I never got back to you about this. While I did get up the region last May, I did not get a chance to get to Northfield. However, I have found the following from History of the Town of Northfield, MA (available on Ancestry.com): Tombstone inscription: In memory of the Rev. Mr. Benjamin Doolittle, First Pastor of the Church of Christ in Northfield, who died Jany. ye 9, 1748, in the 54th year of his age, and 30th year of his ministry. Blessed with good intellectual parts, Well skilled in two important arts, Nobly he filled the double station, Both of a preacher and physician, To cure men's sicknesses and sins, He took unwearied care and pains, and strove to make his patient whole, Thorough in body and soul. He lov'd his God, lov'd to do good, To all his friends vast kindness show'd, Nor could his enemies exclaim, And say he was not kind to them. His labors met a sudden close, Now he enjoys a sweet repose. And when the just to life shall rise, Among the first he'll mount the skies. The same book goes on to describe the fate of his widow, Lydia Todd Doolittle. She married twice after he died, including a late-in-life marriage when she was 80. She survived that spouse as well, and was always known as Madam Doolittle. She died 16 Jan 1792 in Northfield. The history does not indicate where she was buried, but if you don't find her next to Benjamin, she may be buried under the name Chapin (the surname of her 3rd husband). Here's a quote about her from the Northfield history: "It is said that she possessed great mental as well as physical ability, that she received an unusually refined culture, before her first marriage, and ever after had the privilege of that class of society, calculated to increase it. My impression, from what I have heard through those who were well acquainted with her, is that her moral and religious character was fully equal to her other attainments. She had been a school teacher before marriage, and in her old age she devoted much of her time to the instruction of her numerous grand-children, retaining her faculties to the last. Her death, in her 92nd year, was occasioned by a fall, while taking one of these children from a table upon which it had climbed..."

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Surnames: Barber Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/940.2.2 Message Board Post: Sue, I forgot to ask you: who are your Barber connections in Vermont? My husband is also descended from Vermont Barbers. Perhaps a connection? If we've communicated before, my apologies; I'm on a different computer with out my years of emails. -- Jillaine Washington DC

I have the Warwick histories and County religion book I can check. Joel ----- Original Message ----- From: <jillainedc@yahoo.com> To: <MAFRANKL-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 11:58 AM Subject: [MAFRANKL] Warwick Church History? > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > Classification: Query > > Message Board URL: > > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/2124 > > Message Board Post: > > Seeking to communicate with researchers very familiar with the religious > history of Warwick. > > Am particularly interested in the Revolutionary period shortly after > Warwick's founding. > > Would love to communicate with someone familiar with the introduction of > Baptists to the area about 1771-1777. > > Jillaine Smith > Washington DC > jillainedc @ yahoo dot com > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > MAFRANKL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/359.517.1 Message Board Post: Yes, there is connection all, go back to New Salem, Franklin Co., MA. ...Darrah Dunn Stephen--Did you read whole New Salem site? Would be cousins.Other cousins moved to NY from New Salem.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/rw/4EB.2ACE/2125 Message Board Post: looking for a written birth record for Alexander Hart. B: ? 22 Nov. 1818 Coleraine, MA. Father: John, Mother: unknown. thanks , Lynne

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Classification: Query Message Board URL: http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/4EB.2ACE/1071.1 Message Board Post: Thanks to all the folks who sent me Paul's current info (including him). -- Jillaine