Morning Betty . Jim B. and all Listers, Betty S. and Jim B. proud to be your Cuzs, looks like many times over. :) . Betty S. , thanks for sharing this Bullock data and Jim B. thanks for reminding us that many of these pedigrees back to the 16th century and more are usually not proven and should be taken with a grain of salt, till such time they are proved. We all share what we have in our data, and hopefully others have sources and can correct us , with proven data, if found , or they have. Isn't that what these list are all about?? I have a few what are called "Mythical Pedigrees" in my data also. However till proven otherwise , I keep them. :) Gosh I have the "ADAMS Line" back to Adam. ( That is the first Adam. :) Some people go to great lengths to compile these. Right, wrong or indifferent pedigrees . They are out there for us to ponder on and share. On these list we share what we have and that is what it's all about. If we didn't , there would be no need for list like Ma- Mendon, and other list. So Listers, all keep sharing, as that's what we are all about. We are all here to learn more about our ancestors and their families, locales, and etc. . There are no wrong messages on this list, except NO messages . :) Have a nice Day, Alice > Alice and Jim, > Well, it looks like Jim has blown a couple of holes in my > research on Richard BULLOCK, --------snipped---------------