In a message dated 20/01/02 16:01:26 GMT Standard Time, LOVELOCK-D-request@rootsweb.com writes: > Subject: Lyneham Lovelocks > Hello James, I am glad to see you are coming close to home, even though they are Lovelock`s. You most likely know that the were not there in 1851. We may gain if I apply to Glam List for his marriage as you see his wife was born Glam. There were two there in 1851. Lodgers at same house un-named St Georges Parish with Williams family. Mary Lovelock aged 12 scholar. born Tythegston. John Lovelock aged 7 scholar born same. Very strange as being Scholars, they must be connected with Williams in some way. One other in Glam 1851. At Pontypridd. John Lovelock lodger aged 21. born Coychurch. I have been at Margam Abbey recently on other work, but still look to see that yours are safe. Best Regards Allen in Aberavon

Hello Allen, Ableth@aol.com wrote: > > Hello James, > I am glad to see you are coming close to home, even though they are > Lovelock`s. The reasons I'm interested in George and family are: (1) This branch also mutated to LovelUck a generation or so later, as my ancestor John Lovelock/luck is rumoured to have done much earlier (2) George came from Wiltshire, which is where my ancestor John Loveluck is rumoured to have come from > You most likely know that the were not there in 1851. Yes, I checked the 1851 census for him. > > I have been at Margam Abbey recently on other work, but still look to see > that yours are safe. > Thanks for keeping an eye on them Allen :-) Best wishes, James