Hello all, I've now added files (html and Excel) with all the Lovelock extracts for Wilstshire from the 1901 census. I obtained these results from the "no charge" data using the program that Graham brought to our attention to group the data into families. Since these files involve data for Wiltshire only, I've linked them to the page Sources -> Wiltshire. There are also links on the "What's New" page. I hope this will earn me a brownie point from Graham ;-) Now on to Berks, Hants, ... Regards, James

Ah! A bit sooner off the mark than I expected. Problem: the dear old transcribers have unhelpfully not stuck to Wiltshire throughout. A check of all data will show that there are apparently 40 females in Wiltshire (of which, by my counting only 38 seem to have been captured, so I'm not sure what happened there), but there are another 67 in Wilts. Be warned, James, or anyone else that has a go that to capture all in Hampshire, for instance, that you will need to cover Hampshire, Hants and Southampton as the County. And Berkshire, Berks and Reading, and Hertford and Herts, and so on and so on. We just knew it was all looking too easy, didn't we? However, a great start. I have done a check of all LOVELOCK entries. According to me there are 818 males and 850 females (surprisingly equally spread male for female in each band of roughly ten years I note as an aside), so when we have everything assembled the numbers should all add up. Perhaps somebody might like to check my totals? There are also, of course, some variations on the name, not the least of which are the LOVELUCKs, which I am happy to tally up unless anyone else has also just completed the exercise? In something of a rush before I am left behind by everyone's enthusiasm .............. Graham ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Loveluck" <james.loveluck@numericable.fr> To: <LOVELOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:25 PM Subject: 1901 census extracts for Wilts > Hello all, > > I've now added files (html and Excel) with all the Lovelock extracts for > Wilstshire from the 1901 census. I obtained these results from the "no > charge" data using the program that Graham brought to our attention to > group the data into families. > > Since these files involve data for Wiltshire only, I've linked them to > the page Sources -> Wiltshire. There are also links on the "What's New" > page. > > I hope this will earn me a brownie point from Graham ;-) > > Now on to Berks, Hants, ... > > Regards, > > James > > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 >