Greetings, all It's great to see Colin's regular contributions of material, BUT - is someone intending to consolidate it into a Lovelock-Census Info database in due course for eventual inclusion on the Website? I know James is rather busy, but I seem to recall a question being asked at one time whether we should all pool the data we have culled. I have a fair amount drawn from all of the first 6 released which I am happy to put into the pot. Graham PS (For Colin) The abbreviation for Hampshire is HANTS not HAMTS. According to Chambers Dictionary this is because the original name of the county was Hantshaving, but don't ask me how on earth it got that name. Which reminds me - the Hampshire List had some correspondence on this recently, which wasn't resolved. I'll now go tell 'em. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin P Borrott-Maloney" <colinbm@bigpond.com> To: <LOVELOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 1:31 PM Subject: Hartley Wintney HAMTS 1861 census > Hi Lovies > Some more Lovelock material to feed upon. > > Hartley Wintney 1861 Census > 17 Albion Place, Thomas LOVELOCK, 40 yrs, Maltster, born Crondall HAMTS. > Mary Anne, 33 yrs, born Odiham HAMTS. > Mary, 11 yrs, born Hartley Wintney HAMTS. > Thomas, 8 yrs, Scholar, born Hartley Wintney HAMTS. > Olivia, 3 yrs, born Hartley Wintney HAMTS. > Edward, 6 mths, born Hartley Wintney HAMTS. > > Grange Moor ................etc
Thanks for that Graham, I will come to grips on UK names one day. Us Aussies are only used to 'aboriginal' place names ! Regards Col ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Lovelock" <lovelockgraham@hotmail.com> To: <LOVELOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 5:21 AM Subject: Re: Hartley Wintney HAMTS 1861 census > Greetings, all > > It's great to see Colin's regular contributions of material, BUT - is > someone intending to consolidate it into a Lovelock-Census Info database in > due course for eventual inclusion on the Website? I know James is rather > busy, but I seem to recall a question being asked at one time whether we > should all pool the data we have culled. I have a fair amount drawn from all > of the first 6 released which I am happy to put into the pot. > > Graham > > PS (For Colin) The abbreviation for Hampshire is HANTS not HAMTS. According > to Chambers Dictionary this is because the original name of the county was > Hantshaving, but don't ask me how on earth it got that name. Which reminds > me - the Hampshire List had some correspondence on this recently, which > wasn't resolved. I'll now go tell 'em. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Colin P Borrott-Maloney" <colinbm@bigpond.com> > To: <LOVELOCK-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 1:31 PM > Subject: Hartley Wintney HAMTS 1861 census > > > > Hi Lovies > > Some more Lovelock material to feed upon. > > > > Hartley Wintney 1861 Census > > 17 Albion Place, Thomas LOVELOCK, 40 yrs, Maltster, born Crondall HAMTS. > > Mary Anne, 33 yrs, born Odiham HAMTS. > > Mary, 11 yrs, born Hartley Wintney HAMTS. > > Thomas, 8 yrs, Scholar, born Hartley Wintney > HAMTS. > > Olivia, 3 yrs, born Hartley Wintney HAMTS. > > Edward, 6 mths, born Hartley Wintney HAMTS. > > > > Grange Moor ................etc > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 >