Hello again, [Message already sent to Robert and Graham, but maybe others on the list are interested.] Concerning comment (fff), Graham's notes referred back to comment (e), which included details of PRO reords for the children of Charles L (1848 - 1923) son of James L (1826-1897) and Honor Gigg. However, it also referred to the 1881 census record for James L and Honor Gigg and I took a more detailed look at this. One finds James and Honor with 4 of their 11 children (Richard, John, James and Ellen) still living with them. However, the bit that interested me was that there was in addition: Flora LOVELOCKE M 26 F Easton, Wiltshire, England Rel: Daur In Law Occ: (Engineers Wife) Frederick W. LOVELOCKE 2 M Hungerford, Berkshire, England Rel: Grandson Walter J. LOVELOCKE 10 m M Hungerford, Berkshire, England Rel: Grandson Flora was presumably the wife of one of the other children of James & Honor L, not present at the time. since the children were born Hungerford Berks, I looked in the "Lovelocks in Berkshire" file and found the following marriage: 1877 Dec 25 William Lovelock married Flora Stagg but not the baptisms of Frederick or Walter. So I assume that it was the 5th child of James & Honor L, William John L bap 18 Jun 1855, who married Flora Stagg. Unless you see a hole in this, I propose to enter this marriage and the two children. Regards, James

James Loveluck wrote: > Flora LOVELOCKE M 26 F Easton, Wiltshire, England > Rel: Daur In Law > Occ: (Engineers Wife) > Frederick W. LOVELOCKE 2 M Hungerford, Berkshire, England > Rel: Grandson > Walter J. LOVELOCKE 10 m M Hungerford, Berkshire, England > Rel: Grandson > > Flora was presumably the wife of one of the other children of James & > Honor L, not present at the time. since the children were born > Hungerford Berks, I looked in the "Lovelocks in Berkshire" file and > found the following marriage: > > 1877 Dec 25 William Lovelock married Flora Stagg > > but not the baptisms of Frederick or Walter. If I hadn't had my nose so close to the grindestone I would have seen that Graham had already noticed Flora and her two children. He also found this family (together with husband and two additional children) in the 1891 census for Hungerford. However, we do now have the surname (Stagg) for Flora. James