Hello all, Robert Sterry pointed out that the "Wallingford, Berks., Croydon, Kent, and New Zealand fragment", in the collection of Miscellaneous Lovelock Trees and Fragments, is already part of the Berkshire Lovelock Line, so I have removed it from the collection. James

PS I also corrected the name of the (first) wife of Daniel Lovelock at the head of the Nevada Lovelock Line from Jane Roberts to Jane Rees, following the correspondence with Chris Knight, Richard Dowd and Jack Lovelock on the list. However, those who have been following this story will be aware that this fragment is likely to be absorbed into the Lyneham Line! James James Loveluck wrote: > Hello all, > > Robert Sterry pointed out that the "Wallingford, Berks., Croydon, > Kent, and New Zealand fragment", in the collection of Miscellaneous > Lovelock Trees and Fragments, is already part of the Berkshire > Lovelock Line, so I have removed it from the collection. > > James > > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > >

I've already entered the Nevada tree into my version of the Lyneham tree. However, there's lots more research possible on this line - as Chris observed. I'm just waiting for someone to take up the challenge!! I rechecked some of the Australian stuff but most seems ok. The Victorian Registry Office: http://online.justice.vic.gov.au/CA256C7100199CBE/page/Births+Deaths+and+Mar riages+Online+Shop-Births+Deaths+and+Marriages+Online+Shop?OpenDocument&1=0- Births+Deaths+and+Marriages+Online+Shop~&2=0-Births+Deaths+and+Marriages+Onl ine+Shop~&3=~ (what an address!) now also has it's indexes on line - except not free like New South Wales. A99c to view the index and A$17.50 for an email copy of the full record! Cheers Robert > -----Original Message----- > From: James Loveluck [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, 9 November 2004 9:34 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Miscellaneous fragments cleanup > > > PS I also corrected the name of the (first) wife of Daniel > Lovelock at > the head of the Nevada Lovelock Line from Jane Roberts to Jane Rees, > following the correspondence with Chris Knight, Richard Dowd and Jack > Lovelock on the list. However, those who have been following > this story > will be aware that this fragment is likely to be absorbed into the > Lyneham Line! > > James > > James Loveluck wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > Robert Sterry pointed out that the "Wallingford, Berks., Croydon, > > Kent, and New Zealand fragment", in the collection of Miscellaneous > > Lovelock Trees and Fragments, is already part of the Berkshire > > Lovelock Line, so I have removed it from the collection. > > > > James > > > > > > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > > Lovelock family history Web pages: > > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > > > ============================== > > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records > added in the > > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > > > > > > > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only > for ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx >