Hello all, Following his visit to London, Robert Sterry provided updates of a number of files, and the following are now available on the Web site: o Lovelock extracts from the 1851 census for Berkshire o Lovelock extracts from the 1851 census for Middlesex and London o Lovelock extracts from the 1851 census for Surrey (this is a new file) o Lovelocks in Surrey by Parish There is still one file that I haven't uploaded to the Web site - an update to the Lovelocks in Wiltshire by Parish file. I had made some changes to this file myself (flagging the Lyneham Line), and I need to merge them with Robert's changes. This might have to wait for a while as I'll be away on holiday for a couple of weeks from tomorrow. Here are some notes from Robert on his Lovelock research in London: "The 1851 census for London and Middlesex and also for Surrey required visiting three archives in London to obtain and represents full census data on all indexed 1851 registration districts for these counties. I believe the data is very near complete for the 1851 overall for these counties. Of particular interest is Lovelocks coming into London about this time from Hampshire/Wiltshire/Berkshire - often difficult to find. There was obviously a significant Lovelock presence in these counties well before 1851 - which isn't surprising. Would be interesting to try and identify when they arrived and where they came from. I also finished off the 'as enumerated' detail for Berkshire so the 1851 for Berkshire is now complete with all detail. This has now been published in full by the Wiltshire FHS. I had only previously seen the index. The update to the Wiltshire (by parish) file is mainly the rechecked Great Bedwyn PR (using films of original PRS and modern transcripts) where we had some significant variances. The missing PRs for East Grafton - ie before 1844 - were unfortunately not available at SOG. I discussed with Graham possibly checking these if they were available. The update to the Surrey (by parish) file represents a check of many of the PRs at SOG for Surrey that allowed a quick lookup ie were transcribed and usually indexed. For the record I completed shelf reference numbers SR/R 1-106. SOG has a lot of unpublished modern transcripts, many of which are surname indexed. Very useful and very time saving." Regards, James

Thank you all Ladies & Gentlemen who have made the Lovelock site such a joy to see & use. Thanks for the wonderful work on the updates. I will certainly look forward to the newsletter re the gathering. Thanks again to these wonderful people who have made this site so great. Cheers Col ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Loveluck" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 11:01 PM Subject: Updated files on the Web site > Hello all, > > Following his visit to London, Robert Sterry provided updates of a > number of files, and the following are now available on the Web site: > > o Lovelock extracts from the 1851 census for Berkshire > o Lovelock extracts from the 1851 census for Middlesex and London > o Lovelock extracts from the 1851 census for Surrey > (this is a new file) > o Lovelocks in Surrey by Parish > > There is still one file that I haven't uploaded to the Web site - an > update to the Lovelocks in Wiltshire by Parish file. I had made some > changes to this file myself (flagging the Lyneham Line), and I need to > merge them with Robert's changes. This might have to wait for a while as > I'll be away on holiday for a couple of weeks from tomorrow. > > Here are some notes from Robert on his Lovelock research in London: > > "The 1851 census for London and Middlesex and also for Surrey required > visiting three archives in London to obtain and represents full census data > on all indexed 1851 registration districts for these counties. I believe the > data is very near complete for the 1851 overall for these counties. Of > particular interest is Lovelocks coming into London about this time from > Hampshire/Wiltshire/Berkshire - often difficult to find. There was obviously > a significant Lovelock presence in these counties well before 1851 - which > isn't surprising. Would be interesting to try and identify when they arrived > and where they came from. I also finished off the 'as enumerated' detail for > Berkshire so the 1851 for Berkshire is now complete with all detail. This > has now been published in full by the Wiltshire FHS. I had only previously > seen the index. > > The update to the Wiltshire (by parish) file is mainly the rechecked Great > Bedwyn PR (using films of original PRS and modern transcripts) where we had > some significant variances. The missing PRs for East Grafton - ie before > 1844 - were unfortunately not available at SOG. I discussed with Graham > possibly checking these if they were available. The update to the Surrey (by > parish) file represents a check of many of the PRs at SOG for Surrey that > allowed a quick lookup ie were transcribed and usually indexed. For the > record I completed shelf reference numbers SR/R 1-106. SOG has a lot of > unpublished modern transcripts, many of which are surname indexed. Very > useful and very time saving." > > Regards, > > James > > > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more. > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237 > > > __________ NOD32 1.820 (20040723) Information __________ > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > http://www.nod32.com > >