Hello all, Graham Lovelock has been busy again, and I've uploaded to the Web site a new tree he provided for Worplesdon (Surrey) and beyond, together with supporting census records. The document containing the tree also inlcudes data for the Worplesdon area which is unaccounted for, some speculations about the origins of John Lovelock (b abt 1765) at the head of the tree, and a number of puzzles. The tree and census records are linked to the Work in Progress page: http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/wip/wip.html Many thanks to Graham for this contribution. James
Well done Graham! Keep up the great work. Best wishes Robert --------------------------------------------- Robert Sterry 9 Baileys Lane, Kurrajong Hills NSW AUSTRALIA > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of James Loveluck > Sent: Tuesday, 10 October 2006 5:07 AM > To: Lovelock mailing list > Subject: [LOVELOCK] A tree for Worplesdon (Surrey) and beyond > > Hello all, > > Graham Lovelock has been busy again, and I've uploaded to the Web site a > new tree he provided for Worplesdon (Surrey) and beyond, together with > supporting census records. The document containing the tree also > inlcudes data for the Worplesdon area which is unaccounted for, some > speculations about the origins of John Lovelock (b abt 1765) at the head > of the tree, and a number of puzzles. The tree and census records are > linked to the Work in Progress page: > > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/wip/wip.html > > Many thanks to Graham for this contribution. > > James > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > Browse Lovelock trees on the PhpGedView portal: > http://james.loveluck.free.fr/PGV-3.3.8/ > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to LOVELOCK- > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message