A couple of other thoughts ..... Puttenham is halfway between Farnham and Guildford, and about 12 miles from Dogmersfield. There is a candidate for George, I suggest - the son of William and Anne, baptised 26 Feb 1797 at Dogmersfield. He is probably the one who married an Elizabeth and fathered Sarah Ann who was baptised on 22 Aug 1824. Wife Elizabeth seems likely to be the one buried 23 Jan 1825 at the age of 21. I note that the Puttenham entry reveals that the George who married Hannah Marshall was a widower. The Removal Order is interesting (and was one of the last issued in Puttenham one suspects, as they were discontinued in 1834 apparently) as it refers to 'their parish of Settlement' implying that Hannah was a Dogmersfield girl as well. Had she been from Puttenham there would have been no Removal Order as marriage with a native gave one Settlement rights. Presumably as Col suggests, the couple (and so soon after their marriage!) fell on hard times and turned to the Parish Relief system for assistance. It would also seem that they complied with the Order from the evidence of the Hannah burial in 1838. How annoying that the age for that burial is not available. One remaining question, of course - where did George 'escape' to, if his absence from the Dogmersfield burial records is not simply an indication that the record has not yet been found there? Regards to all Graham ----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Borrott-Maloney" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 3:11 AM Subject: Re: Lovelock Removal Order - Surrey to Hants > Hi James & all > The "Removal Order" is given when they applied for parish releif or were > unemployed etc. > They were ususlly told to go back to their "Own" parish of birth. > Cheers > Col > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Loveluck" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 1:41 AM > Subject: Lovelock Removal Order - Surrey to Hants > > > > Hello all, > > > > Alison Vickery sent me a pointer to the following Web page: > > > > http://freespace.virgin.net/ar.indexes/PuttPLSRO.htm > > > > which includes the following text: > > > > 1833 Removal Order for George LOVELOCK and Hannah his wife from Puttenham > > to their parish of Settlement – Degmersfield. > > (Degmersfield should presumably be Dogmersfield) > > > > I don't believe there's a Puttenham in Hants, but in our "Lovelocks in > > Surrey" file I found a marriage record as follows: > > *Puttenham > > Marriages 1696-1812 *(Modern Transcript) > > 1833 Feb 17 George Lovelock, wid. & Hannah Marshall, widow > > > > There is a burial record at Dogmersfield for a Hannah Lovelock on 23 Sep > > 1838, which could very well be the Hannah in question. > > > > Does anyone have any connection with this family, which doesn't seem to > > fit in with our current Hants lines? > > > > Also, any background about "Removal Orders" would be interesting. What > > awful crime had been commited to warrant being removed from Surrey to > > darkest Hants? > > > > James > > > > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > > Lovelock family history Web pages: > > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > > > ============================== > > Find your ancestors in the Birth, Marriage and Death Records. > > New content added every business day. Learn more: > > http://www.ancestry.com/s13964/rd.ashx > > > > > > __________ NOD32 1.1154 (20050625) Information __________ > > > > This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > ==== LOVELOCK Mailing List ==== > Lovelock family history Web pages: > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/ > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > >