Hello all, I've updated the Hampshire - Suffolk - Rutland - Herefordshire tree on the Web site: http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/wip/hants-to-hereford.html Nigel Gerdes had noticed that Frederick Lovelock (b abt 1853) who appears in this tree is probably the same individual who appears at the top of the <http://perso.numericable.fr/%7Elovjames/family-history/lovelock/fragments/wesmill-hants-tree.html>Wesmill Tree: http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/fragments/wesmill-hants-tree.html Consequently, the latter has been merged into the Hants to Hereford tree, together with a few additions following exchanges with Nigel and Graham Lovelock. The changes and additions are indicated by text in red. Many thanks to Nigel and Graham for their contributions! James
I forgot to mention that I was able to confirm some details of the New Zealand branch of this new fragment (family of Charles Lovelock & Elizabeth Cathleen Walker) using the BMD data provided by Mary Pipe, which is now on our "Aus & NZ" sources page. There were a couple of additional events (indicated at the end of the tree) which may also belong to the tree. Maybe one of our NZ list members could shed some light on these possible links. James James Loveluck wrote: > Hello all, > > I've updated the Hampshire - Suffolk - Rutland - Herefordshire tree on > the Web site: > > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/wip/hants-to-hereford.html > > > Nigel Gerdes had noticed that Frederick Lovelock (b abt 1853) who > appears in this tree is probably the same individual who appears at > the top of the > <http://perso.numericable.fr/%7Elovjames/family-history/lovelock/fragments/wesmill-hants-tree.html>Wesmill > Tree: > > http://perso.numericable.fr/~lovjames/family-history/lovelock/fragments/wesmill-hants-tree.html > > > Consequently, the latter has been merged into the Hants to Hereford > tree, together with a few additions following exchanges with Nigel and > Graham Lovelock. The changes and additions are indicated by text in red. > > Many thanks to Nigel and Graham for their contributions! > > James > >